14.6 C
Brussels
Monday, October 28, 2024
Home Blog Page 1193

If you like this TV show, read this book

0
If you like this TV show, read this book


During the past few years, the number of books I’ve read has dwindled, while the amount of shows I’ve binge-watched has skyrocketed. It’s a lot easier to be drawn to the remote, but books are an equal, if not better, source of entertainment. They carry the same appeal but hold so much more content than the screen could ever portray. Plus, reading provides you with the opportunity to visualize characters yourself. Sure, you’re given a basic description of what they look like, but it allows far more interpretation than being fed an actor or actress some casting director deemed fit for the role.  

That all being said, sometimes it can be difficult to choose a book that will capture your attention. By looking at your taste in television shows, you can get a better picture of what kind of book you’d like to read. So here are some of my recommendations to you. 

“The Bachelor” 

If you love all the drama that comes with “The Bachelor,” there’s no doubt you’ll love “The Selection” series by Kiera Cass. The show isn’t really up my alley, but even I can admit there is something entertaining about a group of women battling over one guy. It’s very reminiscent of “The Hunger Games”; though there is less physical gore, there is certainly plenty of emotional warfare at play. 

“The Selection” features a face-off between a bunch of ruthless girls, not only seeking their way to a man’s heart, but vying for the crown. Every girl has dreamt of being a princess, right? America Singer, one of the 35 contestants, finds herself warring between a future with her forbidden love of a lower caste or a future with the prince. Either way, a life of luxury does not come so easily, as the palace is riddled with attacks, making this series essentially a dystopian version of “The Bachelor.” 

“The Great British Baking Show” 

If you’re into competitions more friendly in nature and are a fan of “The Great British Baking Show,” you might just find your mouth watering at the descriptions of Cath’s culinary creations in “Heartless” by Marissa Meyer. Though this book is a lot more fantastical than “The Great British Baking Show.” It features a character whose one goal in life is to open a bakery in Wonderland. Cath is constantly whipping up delectable treats, whether it be pumpkin cake, delicate rose macarons or lemon tarts made from a magical tree. The story even includes a baking competition, where the King of Hearts, rather than Paul Hollywood, judges the treats. 

“Outer Banks” 

Many people got swept up into “Outer Banks” at the start of quarantine, and I can’t blame them. The setting had such a unique vibe, and if you enjoyed it, chances are you’ll love “The Rest of the Story” by Sarah Dessen. I usually prod fun at the cheesy nature of Dessen’s stories, but this one makes me feel nostalgic for an experience I never actually had: summer at the lake. This contemporary novel takes place in a town where the lake is its most notable feature. The protagonist, Emma Saylor, is on the hunt for who her late mother really was, similar to John B’s quest to find out what happened to his father. There is also the interesting dynamic of a town divided by tourism, with half of the lake being home to rich tourists, while the other half live there year-round, working diligently just to make ends meet. This dynamic reminded me a lot of the tension between Pogues and Kooks in “The Outer Banks.” 

“The Society” 

This show is basically a modern-day version of my favorite piece of required reading, “Lord of the Flies.” Following a group of young schoolboys stranded on an island without any adult supervision whatsoever, they quickly become their own worst enemies, unable to work together towards a solution. The Society takes a similar turn, with high schoolers scavenging for signs of life, hoarding food and even poisoning one another as power dynamics shift.   

“You” 

Let’s be real, if you liked this show, you’d probably enjoy most psychological thrillers out there today. But a solid book to start with is “The Girl on the Train,” which follows a woman who becomes obsessed with a couple whom she sees on her daily commute to work. She becomes preoccupied envisioning what their lives are like, and when tragedy strikes, finds herself thrust into their actual story. 

“Mindhunter” 

I don’t know many people who watch “Mindhunter,” but it’s seriously amazing. It follows the creation and cultivation of the term “serial-killer,” with an investigative duo visiting and studying several convicted criminals who could potentially fall under this category. At one point, they actually visit Charles Mansfield, who is a huge part of the book “The Girls” by Emma Cline. The novel does an incredible job delving into the fascinating mindset of the members of his cult, depicting just how willing they were to go to unthinkable extremes. 

“Say Yes to the Dress” 

If you love this show, along with other TLC offerings, you’ll definitely love the family dynamic present in “Save the Date” by Morgan Matson. This book is filled with everything you could possibly imagine relating to the stress of wedding planning, from dealing with a big family and conflicting personalities to crushing on the wedding planner’s nephew. Just like in all of Matson’s books, the characters are extremely lovable and will definitely fuel your love of all things wedding.  

Ukraine joins EU’s decision to expand sanctions against Syrian regime

0
Ukraine joins EU's decision to expand sanctions against Syrian regime

(MENAFN – UkrinForm) Ukraine has joined a decision of the Council of the European Union to impose restrictive measures against individuals and legal entities in connection with the situation in Syria.

This is said in the Declaration by the EU High Representative on behalf of all member states, published on the website of the Council of the EU, Ukrinform reports.

“On 15 January 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/30 implementing Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP. The Council added one person to the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject to restrictive measures in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP. The Candidate Countries the Republic of North Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania, and the EFTA countries Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, members of the European Economic Area, as well as Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia align themselves with this Council Decision,” the declaration reads.

According to the document, these countries will ensure that their national policies conform to this Council Decision. The European Union took note of this commitment and welcomed it.

In May 2013, the Council of the EU agreed to adopt restrictive measures against Syria in the following fields: export and import restrictions with the exception of arms and related material and equipment which might be used for internal repression; restrictions on financing of certain enterprises; restrictions on infrastructure projects; restrictions of financial support for trade; financial sector; transport sector; restrictions on admission; and freezing of funds and economic resources.

By a decision dated January 15, 2021, the Council added the newly appointed foreign minister of Syria to the sanctions list.

ish

MENAFN16022021000193011044ID1101611310


Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Big data: definition, benefits, challenges (infographics) | News | European Parliament

0
Big data: definition, benefits, challenges (infographics) | News | European Parliament

, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20210211STO97614/

EU new car registrations hit record low in January

0
EU new car registrations hit record low in January

New car sales in the European Union fell steeply in January, hitting a record low for the month as coronavirus-related restrictions weighed, according to data published Wednesday.

Across the EU, new car registrations–a reflection of sales–fell 24% to 726,491 vehicles in January, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, or ACEA. The figure is the lowest total for January on record, with pandemic-related restrictions continuing to affect sales. Most markets also had one less business day than the previous January.

A majority of countries in the bloc posted double-digit decreases in January, with Spain hardest hit at a decline of more than 50% on the year. In Germany sales were down 31%, and those in Italy fell 14%. France was the best-performing major market with a drop of 5.8%, while in Sweden sales were up 23%, making it the only EU country where the figure was positive.

Meanwhile, all major European auto makers saw sales decline on-year in January. Volkswagen AG experienced a decline of 27%, while two other German companies, Daimler AG and Bayerische Motoren Werken AG, recorded drops of 14% each. Sales at France’s Renault SA fell 22%, and sales at recently-formed Stellantis NV dropped 26%, based on comparable figures from last year for its constituent companies Fiat Chrysler and Peugeot.

  </div>

Pfizer and BioNTech to Supply the European Union with 200 Million Additional Doses of COMIRNATY®

0
Pfizer and BioNTech to Supply the European Union with 200 Million Additional Doses of COMIRNATY®


Pfizer and BioNTech to Supply the European Union with 200 Million Additional Doses of COMIRNATY® – EU Politics Today – EIN Presswire




















  <div class="eh-ribbon">

      Trusted News Since 1995

    <span class="prof not-if-mobile-w820">A service for political professionals</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w820">·</span>
    <span class="date">Wednesday, February 17, 2021</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w430">
      ·
      <a class="article_live_counter" href="/live_feed">535,588,486</a>
      Articles
    </span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w550">
      ·
      3+ Million Readers
    </span>
  </div>
</header>

<footer>
  <div class="sitemap">
    <h2 class="subheading-osc g_roboto">News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools</h2>
    <div class="row-fluid">
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>News Topics</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Newsletters</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>Press Releases</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Events & Conferences</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>RSS Feeds</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Other Services</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>Questions?</h3>

        </section>
        <br/><section>

        </section>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</footer>









<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="/js/excanvas.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<![endif]-->



<!-- Start Alexa Certify Javascript -->

<noscript/>
<!-- End Alexa Certify Javascript -->
<!--[if IE 7]>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/json2.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

Uber calls for new EU rules to regulate ‘gig economy’ apps

0
Uber calls for new EU rules to regulate ‘gig economy’ apps

Uber Technologies Inc. today called on European Union officials to implement new rules to regulate “gig economy” platforms such as its ride-hailing and food delivery apps.

The company also published a lengthy paper outlining its positions on the matter.

The move comes as the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, prepares to weigh whether regulatory reforms should be implemented to enhance the working conditions provided by Uber and other gig economy apps. A draft version of the new rules could be ready before year’s end, Reuters reported today.

One of the central topics in the discussion around the gig economy has been how to classify gig economy workers. Uber and tech companies with similar business models, such as Lyft Inc., classify their drivers as independent contractors. There have been legislative efforts aimed at requiring the firms to reclassify their drivers as full-time employees and provide them employment benefits such as overtime pay, paid sick leave and family leave.

“We believe a new approach is possible — one where having access to protections and benefits doesn’t come at the cost of flexibility and of job creation,” Uber Chief Executive Officer Dara Khosrowshahi wrote in a blog post today.

In California, voters last year approved a ballot measure called Proposition 22 that allows companies such as Uber to continue classifying drivers as independent contractors but requires them to provide expanded benefits. 

In the EU, new rules are needed to “standardise and improve access to protections and benefits for independent workers,” Khosrowshahi wrote. “This could include helping platform workers pay into existing public social protection schemes. Or it could mean an industry-funded portable benefits fund, allowing platform workers to accrue funds to access the protections and benefits they want.”

The new rules should be implemented in the form of “industry-wide standards that all platform companies must provide for independent workers,” the CEO elaborated. “Critically, whatever the model, there must be an industry level playing field to ensure all independent workers have consistent earnings whichever app they choose to work on.”

The European Commission will reportedly hold a consultation on Feb. 24 to seek feedback from workers and employers’ representatives on gig economy working conditions. The commission will first seek input on whether new rules are needed and then decide the content of the legislation. 

Photo: Unsplash

Since you’re here …

Show your support for our mission with our one-click subscription to our YouTube channel (below). The more subscribers we have, the more YouTube will suggest relevant enterprise and emerging technology content to you. Thanks!

Support our mission:    >>>>>>  SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>>  to our YouTube channel.

… We’d also like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.

France calls for EU to give countries more power to punish big tech

0
France calls for EU to give countries more power to punish big tech

France is reportedly pushing to expand regulations that would give European Union member states more power to punish large tech companies’ bad behavior.

The changes France wants to see concern the Digital Services Act, proposed legislation that was designed to reduce anticompetitive behavior by tech companies and provide more online protections for consumers. If companies are found to have transgressed, the fines would be heavy.

France would also like to see countries have the power to force companies to remove content from their platforms that’s deemed problematic. Effectively, France is calling for individual states rather than the EU to be responsible for weeding out “illegal content.”

As it stands, EU member countries don’t have this ability unless the said tech companies have servers located in their country. Apple Inc., Google LLC, Facebook Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. currently have servers in Ireland and Luxembourg.

According to the Financial Times, Cedric O, France’s minister for the digital economy, has been meeting over the last few weeks with various members of the European parliament to discuss the matter. “Getting these laws passed is a major objective of ours for when France next holds the rotating presidency of the EU Council next year,” he told the Times. “They touch on vitally important subjects both for our economies and democracies.”

The proposition makes some EU officials worried. They told the Times that such a move would “fragment” the single market, saying that if 27 countries are each allowed to make such decisions, the outcome would turn “the single market into a nightmare.”

O also wants member countries to be able to police what it called “harmful content and disinformation,” not just illegal content. “We think the text needs to be broadened to include other types of problematic content,” he said. “If there is no legal framework, there is nothing to stop Twitter or Facebook from censoring speech they do not like.”

Photo: Christiaan Colen/Flickr

Since you’re here …

Show your support for our mission with our one-click subscription to our YouTube channel (below). The more subscribers we have, the more YouTube will suggest relevant enterprise and emerging technology content to you. Thanks!

Support our mission:    >>>>>>  SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>>  to our YouTube channel.

… We’d also like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.

EU to launch study programme for COVID-19 variants

0
EU to launch study programme for COVID-19 variants

PARIS, Feb 15: The European Union will this week kick off a new programme to study mutations in the COVID-19 virus, in a bid to prepare for the next generation of vaccines that might be needed, the European Commission’s president told Les Echos.

The programme, dubbed “HERA incubator,“ will bring together health authorities and laboratories and have its own funding, Ursula von der Leyen said in an interview with the French financial newspaper. It will be launched on Wednesday.

“As of now, and in parallel to the efforts being made on the current vaccines, we have to help industrial companies develop production capacities for second generation vaccines,“ von der Leyen was quoted as saying.

Von der Leyen last week acknowledged failings in the EU’s approval and rollout of vaccines against COVID-19 and said the bloc had learned lessons in the process after criticism of the slow roll-out of vaccines. –Reuters

Ahold Delhaize reports Q4 results; strengthens position as industry-leading local omnichannel retailer in 2021 and beyond

0
Ahold Delhaize reports Q4 results; strengthens position as industry-leading local omnichannel retailer in 2021 and beyond


Ahold Delhaize reports Q4 results; strengthens position as industry-leading local omnichannel retailer in 2021 and beyond – Book Publishing Industry Today – EIN Presswire




















  <div class="eh-ribbon">

      Trusted News Since 1995

    <span class="prof not-if-mobile-w820">A service for publishing professionals</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w820">·</span>
    <span class="date">Wednesday, February 17, 2021</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w430">
      ·
      <a class="article_live_counter" href="/live_feed">535,593,575</a>
      Articles
    </span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w550">
      ·
      3+ Million Readers
    </span>
  </div>
</header>

<footer>
  <div class="sitemap">
    <h2 class="subheading-osc g_roboto">News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools</h2>
    <div class="row-fluid">
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>News Topics</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Newsletters</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>Press Releases</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Events & Conferences</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>RSS Feeds</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Other Services</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>Questions?</h3>

        </section>
        <br/><section>

        </section>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</footer>









<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="/js/excanvas.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<![endif]-->



<!-- Start Alexa Certify Javascript -->

<noscript/>
<!-- End Alexa Certify Javascript -->
<!--[if IE 7]>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/json2.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

Religious freedom is more than religion

0
Religious freedom is more than religion

Brian Festa

On December 21, 2020 –just four days before Christians everywhere would celebrate the birth of their Savior– the Vatican’s doctrinal office (The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) issued a statement alleging that it is “morally acceptable” for Catholics to take the COVID-19 vaccine, despite the fact that aborted fetal cells were used in the development of the vaccine. The doctrinal office pointed to the “grave danger” of the COVID-19 pandemic, reasoning that the threat posed to life on earth outweighs the inherent immorality of profiting from the murder of innocent life in the womb.

The office continued…

When ethically irreproachable COVID-19 vaccines are not available … it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and production process.

Let’s just start with the easy part: the Vatican is WRONG, dead wrong (quite literally, as they are advocating that Christians seek to gain a profit from death itself). It is never morally permissible to commit evil acts, even for the sake of some “greater good.” That is absolutely and unequivocally at odds with Catholic teaching, and faithful Catholics (not just the kind that are more than happy to conceal the image of God with a mask in the house of the Lord) know this already.

It is also never morally permissible to profit from the evil of others. As The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) tells us…

A good intention (for example, that of helping one’s neighbor) does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such as lying and calumny, good or just. The end does not justify the means. Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation. CCC 1753 (emphasis added).

It is therefore an error to judge the morality of human acts by considering only the intention that inspires them or the circumstances (environment, social pressure, duress or emergency, etc.) which supply their context. There are acts which, in and of themselves, independently of circumstances and intentions, are always gravely illicit by reason of their object; such as blasphemy and perjury, murder and adultery. One may not do evil so that good may result from it. CCC 1756 (emphasis added).

An evil action cannot be justified by reference to a good intention” (cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, Dec. praec. 6). The end does not justify the means. CCC 1759 (emphasis added).

Were we to follow the Vatican’s reasoning to its natural and logical conclusion, it would be morally permissible for one to willfully slaughter a child in exchange for a terrorist’s promise that he would spare the lives of 10 hostages if you did so. After all, in that dreadful scenario, the ratio of life preserved to life lost would be 10:1, so your act of murder actually saved 10 lives. Given the threat that all 10 of those hostages would be killed if you chose not to kill the child, you really had no “ethically irreproachable” option, right? I hope it is patently obvious that this is a rhetorical question.

But you know what? It really doesn’t matter what they say, because their “opinion” is irrelevant. For the purposes of the First Amendment, if you hold a sincere personal religious belief that it is immoral to use or receive a product that was procured through the death of innocents, you can legitimately claim a religious objection to the COVID-19 vaccine (or any other vaccine produced using aborted fetal cells, like the measles/mumps/rubella, or MMR, vaccine), regardless of your church’s official (or unofficial) position on the subject.

The Supreme Court of the United States, while never precisely defining “religion,” has clearly stated that a law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment if it gives preference to objections founded in theistic beliefs over those that stem from one’s moral, ethical, or philosophical beliefs. See Welsh v. United States, 398 U.S. 333, 356-61 (1970).

As Justice Tom C. Clark so eloquently stated in United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 184 (1965),

The validity of what he believes cannot be questioned. Some theologians, and indeed some examiners, might be tempted to question the existence of the registrant’s ‘Supreme Being’ or the truth of his concepts. But these are inquiries foreclosed to Government.

Those of us involved in the ongoing struggle for medical freedom in this country have heard time and again politicians dismissing their constituents’ religious beliefs as “invalid” simply because they do not align with a tenet or the official position of one’s stated religious affiliation. This would seem to fit squarely within the ambit of the line of inquiries “foreclosed to Government.”

Government officials have absolutely no right to tell you that your beliefs aren’t valid. Politicians are not the arbiters of our faith. We are a nation of free persons, and nowhere does that freedom manifest itself more dearly than in our religious beliefs. Just as it was reprehensible for governors and mayors to pick “winners and losers” among our businesses through illogical and unconstitutional lockdown orders, it is even more reprehensible for state actors to decide which beliefs are worthy of protection.

The Framers of our Constitution agreed, and so gifted us the First Amendment. God bless them, and God bless the brave men and women who have fought so valiantly to defend it. We will not stand idly by while these godless tyrants try to tear that precious document to shreds, besmirching the memory and the honor of those who died for its sake. Stand tall. Stand proud. Stand together, one nation, under God.

Brian Festa is a Hartford attorney and Co-Founder of the CT Freedom Alliance, LLC.


CTViewpoints welcomes rebuttal or opposing views to this and all its commentaries. Read our guidelines and submit your commentary here.