EU co-legislators preliminarily agreed to update EU rules on preventing pollution from ships in European seas and ensuring perpetrators face fines.
On Thursday, Parliament and Council negotiators reached an informal deal to extend an existing ban on discharge of oil spills by ships to include sewage and garbage.
Banning more types of spills from ships
According to the deal, the current list of substances banned from being discharged from ships, such as oil and noxious liquid substances, will now include the discharge of sewage, garbage, and residues from scrubbers.
MEPs managed to secure an obligation for the EU to review the rules five years after their transposition into national law to assess if marine plastic litter, loss of containers and plastic pellet spills from ships should also face penalties.
More robust verification
MEPs ensured EU countries and the Commission will communicate more on pollution incidents, best practices to tackle pollution, and follow-up measures, following alerts by the European satellite system for oil spill and vessel detection, CleanSeaNet. To prevent illegal discharge from dispersing and therefore becoming undetectable, the agreed text foresees the digital check of all high confidence CleanSeaNet alerts and an aim to verify at least 25% of them by the competent national authorities.
Effective penalties
EU countries will need to introduce effective and dissuasive fines for ships breaching these rules, while criminal sanctions were addressed in separate legislation MEPs already agreed with EU governments last November. According to preliminary deal, EU countries shall not set penalties at such a low level that would fail to ensure its dissuasive nature.
Quote
EP rapporteur Marian-Jean Marinescu (EPP, Romania) said: “Ensuring the health of our seas demands not just legislation, but robust enforcement. Member states must not falter in their duty to safeguard our marine environment. We need a concentrated effort, utilising advanced technologies like satellite monitoring and on-site inspections, to stamp out illegal discharges effectively. Penalties must reflect the seriousness of these offenses, acting as a true deterrent. Our commitment is clear: cleaner seas, stricter accountability, and a sustainable maritime future for all.”
Next steps
The preliminary deal still needs to be approved by Council and Parliament. EU countries will have 30 months to transpose new rules into national law and prepare for its implementation.
Background
The deal on the revision of the directive on ship-source pollution is a part of the Maritime safety package presented by the Commission in June 2023. The package aims to modernise and reinforce EU maritime rules on safety and pollution prevention.
from his remarkable historical work “Memorial Book of the Antiquity and Universality of the Congregational Faith”
Chapter 4
But in order to make what we have said clearer, it must be illustrated by separate examples and presented in a little more detail, so that in our pursuit of excessive brevity, the hasty word should take away from the value of things.
In the time of Donatus, from whom the name “Donatists” comes, when a large part of the people in Africa had rushed to the outbreak of their error, when, forgetting name, faith, confession, they had placed the sacrilegious recklessness of one man before the Church of Christ, then, of all throughout Africa, only those who, scorning the foul schism, had joined the universal Church, could preserve themselves unharmed in the sanctuary of the conciliar faith; they indeed left to generations an example, how later prudently to place the health of the whole body before the folly of one, or at most a few. Also, when the Arian poison had infected, not some corner, but almost the whole world, insomuch that a darkness had clouded the minds of almost all the Latin-speaking bishops, led partly by force, partly by deceit, and prevented them from deciding what course to pursue in this confusion – then only he who truly loved and worshiped Christ and placed the ancient faith above the new treachery remained unstained by the contagion that comes from touching him.
The dangers of the time showed more clearly to what extent the introduction of a new dogma could be fatal. Because then not only small things collapsed, but also the most important things. Not only kinships, blood relations, friendships, families, but also cities, peoples, provinces, nations, and finally the entire Roman Empire was shaken and shaken to its foundations. For after this same vile Arian innovation, like some Bellona or fury, had first captured the emperor, and then subjected to the new laws and all the highest people in the palace, it did not cease to mix and confuse everything, private and public, sacred and blasphemous, not to distinguish between good and evil, but to smite whomever he pleases from the height of his position. Then wives were violated, widows insulted, virgins dishonored, monasteries destroyed, clergy persecuted, deacons scourged, priests exiled; prisons, dungeons, and mines were crowded with holy men, most of whom, after being denied access to the cities, cast out and banished, fell upon, ruined, and destroyed by nakedness, hunger, and thirst among deserts, caves, beasts, and rocks. And doesn’t all this happen only because the heavenly teaching is displaced by human superstition, antiquity, which stood on sound foundations, is overthrown by filthy newness, the ancient established ones are insulted, the decrees of the fathers are canceled, the determinations of our forefathers turn to fluff and dust, and the fads of the new vicious curiosity are not kept within the blameless limits of sanctified and uncorrupted antiquity?
Chapter 5
But perhaps we make this up out of hatred for the new and love for the old? Whoever thinks so, let him at least believe the blessed Ambrose, who in his second book to the emperor Gratian, himself lamenting the bitter time, says: “But enough, O God Almighty, we have washed away with our own exile and our own blood the slaughter of confessors, the exiles of priests and the evil of this great wickedness. It is clear enough that those who have defiled the faith cannot be safe.’ And again in the third book of the same work: “Let us observe the precepts of the ancestors and dare not violate with gross recklessness the seals inherited from them. That sealed Book of Prophecy, neither elders, nor powers, nor angels, nor archangels dared to open: Christ alone was reserved the right to first explain it. Who among us would dare to break the seal of the Priestly Book, sealed by the confessors and sanctified by the martyrdom of not one and two? Some were forced to unseal it, but then resealed it, denouncing the fraud; and those who did not dare to desecrate her became confessors and martyrs. How can we deny the faith of those whose victory we proclaim?’ And indeed we proclaim it, O venerable Ambrose! Indeed we proclaim her and, praising her, we marvel at her! Who, then, is so foolish that, although he has no strength to catch up, he does not at least long to follow those whom no power could prevent from defending the faith of the ancestors—neither threats, nor flattery, nor life, nor death, nor palace, no guards, no emperor, no empire, no humans, no demons? Whom, I assert, because they obstinately maintained the religious antiquity, God judged worthy of a great gift: through them to restore fallen churches, to revive spirit-dead nations, to lay cast-off crowns back on the heads of priests, to blot out those pernicious unscriptures , and the stain of the new impiety with a stream of tears of the faithful poured out on the bishops from above, and finally to regain almost the whole world, swept away by the terrible storm of this unexpected heresy, from the new unbelief to the ancient faith, from the new madness to the ancient prudence, from the new blindness to the ancient light. But in all this almost divine virtue of the confessors, one thing is most important for us: that then, in the time of the ancient Church, they took it upon themselves to protect not some part, but the whole. For it was not fitting for so great and illustrious men to support with so great an effort the uncertain and often mutually contradictory suspicions of one or two or three, nor to enter into battles for the sake of some casual agreement in some province; but, following the decrees and determinations of all the priests of the holy Church, inheritors of the apostolic and conciliar truth, they preferred to betray themselves, but not the ancient universal faith. That is why they deserved such great fame – to be considered not only confessors, but first among confessors by right and by merit.
Chapter 6
Great, then, is the example of these blessed men, undoubtedly divine, and worthy of remembrance and untiring reflection on the part of every true Christian; for they, like a seven-candlestick, shining sevenfold with the light of the Holy Spirit, set before the eyes of posterity the brightest rule, how later, amidst the delusions of various idle words, they were to clash the audacity of impious innovation with the authority of sanctified antiquity. But this is not new. Because in the Church it has always been the case that the more religious a person is, the more ready he is to oppose innovations. There are countless such examples. But in order not to get carried away, let us take only one, and he should preferably be from the apostolic see; because everyone can see more clearly with what force, with what aspiration and with what zeal the blessed followers of the blessed apostles invariably defended the unity of the faith once achieved. Once the venerable Agrippinus, bishop of Carthage, was the first who, contrary to the divine canon, contrary to the rule of the universal Church, contrary to the opinions of all his fellow priests, contrary to the custom and establishment of the ancestors, thought that Baptism should be repeated. This innovation entailed so much evil that it not only gave all heretics an example of sacrilege, but also misled some of the faithful. And since the people everywhere murmured against this innovation, and all the priests everywhere opposed it, each according to the degree of his zeal, then the blessed Pope Stephen, prelate of the apostolic throne, opposed it together with his companions, but most zealously of all, thinking, in my opinion, that he ought to surpass all others in his devotion in the faith as much as he excels them in the authority of his office. And finally, in an Epistle to Africa, he affirmed the following: “Nothing is subject to renewal – only the Tradition must be respected.” This holy and prudent man understood that true piety admits of no other rule than that everything should be handed down to the sons with the same faith with which it was received from the fathers; that we should not lead the faith according to our whims, but on the contrary – to follow it where it leads us; and that it is proper to Christian modesty and austerity not to pass on what is his to posterity, but to preserve what he has received from his ancestors. What then was the way out of this whole problem? What, indeed, but the usual and the familiar? Namely: the old was preserved, and the new was shamefully rejected.
But perhaps it was then that his innovation lacked patronage? On the contrary, he had on his side such talents, such rivers of eloquence, such adherents, such plausibility, such prophecies of the Scriptures (interpreted, of course, in a new and wicked way) that, in my opinion, the whole conspiracy could not have collapsed in any other way reason, except one – the vaunted innovation has not stood up to the weight of its own cause, which it has undertaken and defended. What happened next? What were the consequences of this African Council or decree? By God’s will, none; everything was destroyed, rejected, trampled like a dream, like a fairy tale, like a fiction. And, oh, wonderful twist! The authors of this teaching are considered faithful, and its followers heretics; the teachers are acquitted, the students are condemned; the authors of the books will be the sons of the Kingdom of God, and their defenders will be swallowed up by hell fire. So who is the fool who will doubt that that luminary among all bishops and martyrs – Cyprian, together with his companions, will reign with Christ? Or, on the contrary, who is capable of this great sacrilege to deny that the Donatists and other pernicious men, who boast that they have been re-baptized on the authority of that council, will burn in eternal fire with the devil?
Chapter 7
It seems to me that this judgment has been made known from above mostly because of the deceitfulness of those who, thinking to cover up some heresy under a foreign name, usually seize upon the writings of some ancient author, not very clear, which by reason of their obscurity correspond to ujkim of their teaching; so that when they put this thing out somewhere, they don’t seem to be the first or the only ones. This treachery of theirs, in my opinion, is doubly hateful: first, because they are not afraid to offer others to drink of the poison of heresy, and secondly, because with an impious hand they stir up the memory of some holy man, as if they were rekindling coals that had already become ashes, and that which should be buried in silence, they make known anew, bringing it to light again, thus becoming followers of their progenitor Ham, who not only did not cover the nakedness of the venerable Noah, but showed it to others, to laugh at him. Therefore he earned a displeasure for insulting filial piety—so great that even his descendants were bound by the curse of his sins; he was not in the least like his blessed brethren, who would not have the nakedness of their venerable father defile their own eyes, nor reveal it to others, but turning their eyes away, as it is written, covered him: they neither approved, nor did they make known the transgression of the holy man, and therefore were rewarded with a blessing for them and their posterity.
But let’s get back to our topic. Wherefore we ought to be filled with great fear and terror of the crime of changing the faith and profaning piety; not only the teaching about the structure of the Church, but also the categorical opinion of the apostles with their authority prevents us from this. Because everyone knows how strictly, how harshly, how fiercely the blessed apostle Paul attacks some who, with astonishing ease, too quickly passed from the one who “called them to the grace of Christ, to another gospel, not that there is another,” “who, led by their lusts, have gathered to themselves teachers, having turned away their ears from the truth, and have turned to fables,” who “come under condemnation, because they have rejected their first promise,” the same are deceived by those of whom the apostle wrote to the brethren in Rome: “I beseech you, brethren, beware of those who produce divisions and seductions contrary to the doctrine which you have learned, and beware of them. Because such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their bellies, and with sweet and flattering words they deceive the hearts of the simple-minded”, “who creep into houses and seduce wives, burdened with sins and possessed by various lusts, wives who always are learning and can never come to the knowledge of the truth,” “blabbermouths and deceivers, … they spoil whole houses by teaching what they ought not for the sake of vile gain,” “men of perverse minds, rejected of the faith” , “overshadowed by pride, they know nothing and are sick of idle debates and arguments; they think that piety serves for gain,” “being unemployed, they are wont to go from house to house; and not only are they idle, but they are talkative, curious, and speak what is unbecoming,” “who, rejecting a good conscience, are shipwrecked in the faith,” “whose filthy vanities will pile up to more wickedness, and their speech will spreads like a dwelling’. It is also written about them: “But they will not succeed anymore, because their folly will be revealed to everyone, just as their folly was revealed.”
Chapter 8
And so, when some such, traveling through the provinces and cities, and carrying around their delusions, like merchandise, reached as far as the Galatians; and when, after hearing them, the Galatians got a kind of nausea from the truth and threw up the manna of the apostolic and council teaching, and began to enjoy the impurities of the heretical innovation, the authority of the apostolic authority manifested itself, to decree with supreme severity: ” But if even we, says the apostle, or an angel from heaven preached to you something other than what we preached to you, let him be anathema.” Why does he say “but if even we” and not “but if even I”? This means: “even Peter, even Andrew, even John, finally even the whole apostolic choir should preach to you something other than what we have already preached to you, let him be anathema.” Terrible cruelty, not to spare either yourself or the rest of your fellow-apostles, so that the soundness of the original faith could be established! However, this is not all: “Even if an angel from heaven, he says, should preach to you something other than what we preached to you, let him be anathema.” For the preservation of the faith once delivered, it was not enough to mention the human nature alone, but the superior angelic nature had to be included. “Not even we, he says, or an angel from heaven.” Not because the holy angels of heaven are still capable of sinning, but because he wants to say: even if the impossible were to happen – anyone, anyone, should try to change the faith once delivered to us – anathema be. But perhaps he said this thoughtlessly, rather poured it out, carried by human impulse, than decreed it, guided by divine reason? Absolutely not. For there follow words filled with the enormous weight of the repeated statement: “As we have already said, now I say it again: if anyone preaches anything to you other than what you have received, let him be anathema.” He didn’t say “if anyone tells you something different from what you have accepted, let him be blessed, praised, accepted”, but he said: let him be anathema, i.e. removed, excommunicated, excluded, lest the terrible contagion of a sheep to pollute Christ’s flock of innocents by her poisonous mixing with him.
Note: On May 24, the Church celebrates the memory of St. Vincent of Lerin (5th century)
The claim of “NEXO” against Bulgaria, the Ministry of Finance and the Prosecutor’s Office turned out to be over 3 billion dollars. This is clear from the digital asset company’s announcement to the media at the end of January.
“The size of the arbitration claim is determined by the significant material and reputational damages resulting from the actions of the government authorities during the now closed, oppressive investigation against the company, its employees and managers. As expected, the accusations proved to be untenable, and the pre-trial proceedings found their logical end due to lack of crimes”, Nexo wrote.
The claim was filed with the secretariat of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) at the World Bank in Washington, according to international agreements on the protection of investments. Nexo’s interests before the tribunal will be represented by the prestigious American law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, the company reports.
On December 21, 2023, less than a year after the spectacular, ostentatious action and subsequent administrative and institutional arbitrariness, all charges were dropped. The Sofia City Prosecutor’s Office concluded that “no crimes were committed” and terminated the criminal proceedings against the managers of “Nexo” – Kosta Kanchev, Antoni Trenchev, Kalin Metodiev and Trayan Nikolov, thereby categorically exonerating them, the company recalls.
“Having studied the case in depth, we believe in the strength and future success of Nexo’s claim,” Matthew Oresman, managing partner of Pillsbury LLP’s London office, was quoted as saying by the company. Deborah Ruff, head of arbitration in the international office, added: “We look forward to representing our clients in the next phase of this fight for justice.”
The damage sustained is also described. The company writes: “The direct consequences of the attack by the state authorities, accompanied by a serious media campaign against the company and the mass circulation of false statements caused colossal damage to the activity and international reputation of Nexo. The company’s investments in Bulgaria suffered large losses, and significant business opportunities on a global scale lost:
– Nexo’s joint work with three of the largest American investment banks on the initial public offering of the company’s shares on a landmark stock exchange in the United States has been terminated. The valuation of Nexo given by these banks at the time was between US$8 billion and US$12 billion.
– The signing of a long-term cooperation of Nexo with one of the most popular European football clubs with over 330 million supporters worldwide was foiled. The goal of the collaboration was the creation of an exclusive, joint, innovative financial product providing access to the potential of digital assets for the millions of fans of the football giant.
“The tarnished name and reputation of Nexo and its employees in front of local and international authorities, partners and institutions through the circulation of already proven false claims led to the loss of a series of business opportunities, potential revenues and a multi-billion drop in the value of the company”.
“The time has come to demand justice and compensation for the huge reputational and financial damage caused,” the company wrote.
Nexo intends to donate up to 20% of the compensation received to the most needy and neglected sectors in the country – children’s health care and education. “The main priority will be support for the construction of much-needed children’s hospitals and departments in Bulgaria, as well as various initiatives to increase the competitiveness of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” on the global educational scene,” they add.
Let’s remind that in spring 2022 the Nexo team in Bulgaria considered it their human duty to take concrete actions in support of Ukrainian refugees – women, children and families – who have found refuge in the country, as well as to support those affected who have chosen to stay on the territory of Ukraine.
Nexo donated $350,000 or BGN 620,000 to help the victims in three main directions: 1. Humanitarian aid to Ukraine – $135,000; 2. Helping Ukrainian refugees in Bulgaria – $140,000; 3. Support for women and children, Ukrainian refugees, in Bulgaria – $75,000.
Nexo works with a number of local organizations actively involved in providing humanitarian, medical, legal and social assistance, vital supplies of food and clean drinking water, providing emergency shelter to those in need, protecting children and vulnerable groups, and helping for the safe passage of Ukrainian citizens across the border. The provided financial support also supports initiatives to build day care centers for Ukrainian refugee children, to provide educational resources and support for mothers with children with disabilities or developmental difficulties, including long-term support for mothers of children with disabilities or developmental difficulties, Ukrainian refugees on the territory of Bulgaria: donation of $50,000 to the For Our Children Foundation; and support for women and children, Ukrainian refugees, on the territory of Bulgaria: donation of $25,000 to the Bulgarian Women’s Fund.
The Ministry of Education in Ankara has changed the rules for private schools in Turkey. It prohibits “activities that contradict national and cultural values and cannot contribute to the psychosocial development of students”. The ministry has sent a warning letter to schools about celebrating Christmas, Halloween and Easter as early as December 2023.
A new amendment and supplement to the Ordinance on private educational institutions of the Ministry of Education was published in the State Gazette yesterday. Accordingly, a new type of institution called a “center for social activity and development” was designated, where academic development training for secondary school students would be conducted along with social, cultural, artistic and sports activities in accordance with their interests, desires and abilities .
With the new regulation, curricula implemented by international private educational institutions, excluding those that implement Turkish curricula, and all types of teaching materials used in the implementation of these curricula will have to be approved by the Education and Disciplines Council in Ankara.
With the change made regarding the annual working calendar and working hours of the school, it is taken into account in the implementation of a separate working calendar to take into account matters related to the general functioning of education and training, such as central examinations. According to the new provision, activities contrary to national and cultural values and which would not contribute to the psychosocial development of students cannot be carried out.
It is mandatory to teach in schools according to textbooks approved by the Ministry.
Following news in some Turkish media in December 2023 that “parents complain” about Christmas, Halloween and Easter celebrations held in private schools, a letter titled “Social activities to be held in educational institutions” was sent , to all provinces by the Director General for Private Educational Institutions at the Ministry of Education, Fethullah Guner.
The order in question requires private schools to organize all activities in accordance with the general and specific goals and basic principles of Turkish national education.
Illustrative Photo by Yaroslav Shuraev: https://www.pexels.com/photo/orange-pumpkin-beside-the-glass-window-5604228/
The largest remaining hospital in southern Gaza is “barely functional”, the UN World Health Organization (WHO) warned on Friday amid reports of intense attacks by Israeli forces.
There have been reports of damage to Nasser Hospital’s orthopedic unit, reducing its ability to provide urgent medical care, WHO spokesperson Tarik Jašarević told correspondents at a press briefing in Geneva.
“More degradation to the hospital means more lives being lost,” he said.
According to the UN agency, of the 36 hospitals in the war-ravaged enclave, only 11 are functioning. There are also reports that several patients have died during the Israeli operation.
The Israeli military has alleged that Hamas was holding hostages or withholding the bodies of Israelis within the Nasser compound, situated in Khan Younis.
Places of healing, not burial
Nowhere is safe in Gaza Over 70% of civilian infrastructure has been destroyed or severely damaged, and 84% of health facilities have been affected pic.twitter.com/vvSgXbo9AQ
The hospital has been providing lifesaving services to the most critically ill and has been a refuge to countless civilians displaced from elsewhere in the Gaza Strip.
Mr. Jašarević added that WHO was trying to gain urgent access to the complex.
“We really need to get there to bring fuel so [the] hospital can continue to function and those patients who are still there can continue to receive medical care,” he said, also stressing the need to assess the conditions of patients and for their safe referral to other facilities.
“We have been saying all this time…that patients, health workers and civilians who are seeking refuge in hospitals deserve safety and not a burial in those places of healing,” he added.
Intense bombardment continues
Meanwhile, intense Israeli bombardment from air, land and sea continues to be reported across much of the Gaza Strip, resulting in further civilian casualties, displacement and infrastructure damage, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said.
“Widespread ground operations and heavy fighting between Israeli forces and Palestinian armed groups also continue to be reported, especially in the centre of Khan Younis and east of Deir Al-Balah,” OCHA noted in a flash update issued on Friday.
Between the afternoon of 15 February and 11am on 16 February (local times), according to the Ministry of Health in Gaza, 112 Palestinians were killed, and 157 Palestinians were injured, and since 7 October, at least 28,775 Palestinians were killed in Gaza and a further 68,552 reported injured.
Tiny sliver of land
OCHA also relayed reports that intensified airstrikes on Rafah and statements by Israeli officials of a ground operation have led to the movement of people sheltering there towards the town of Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza.
Over half of Gaza’s population are crammed into Rafah, which is located at the southern end of the Strip, in an area that represents just one fifth of the entire enclave.
‘Humanity must prevail’
The situation is particularly dire for pregnant women, new mothers and newborns.
The UN Population Fund (UNFPA) warned that the Al-Helal Al-Emirati Maternity Hospital in Rafah is “overwhelmed and struggling” to provide adequate care.
If the bombs don’t kill pregnant women, if disease, hunger dehydration and don’t catch up with them, simply giving birth could
– UNFPA
“Put simply, if the bombs don’t kill pregnant women, if disease, hunger and dehydration don’t catch up with them, simply giving birth could,” the UN agency, which works for safe motherhood, said.
Further attacks, UNFPA warned, would mark another devastating turn in the war, and thousands more could die in the violence or through lack of access to food, water and critical lifesaving services.
Humanity must prevail, it added, reiterating the call for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza and the safe and immediate release of all hostages.
It urged Israel to allow the provision of medicines and medical personnel and humanitarian assistance, including the special needs of women and girls such as sexual and reproductive health services, and sanitary and hygiene products.
“The clock is ticking fast towards famine and an outbreak of epidemics. The lives and health, physical and mental, of the women and girls of Gaza are severely compromised,” said the committee, which is composed of experts independent of any government and the United Nations.
In the state of Texas, USA, more and more people are making clones of their pets
Owners will still have a copy of their pet to keep raising even after the original dies, citing Voice of America (VOA).
“My first cat was named Chai. I can only describe him as my favorite animal in the entire world. I have never had such a bond with another living creature in my life as I have with this kitten,” says Kelly Anderson, animal trainer. Kelly’s bond with her cat was so strong that she decided to clone it.
“I struggled with depression when she was by my side. The cat saved my life more times than I can count. So it was very hard for me when she died,” the woman adds. In her anguish, she turns to ViaGen Pets & Equine, a US company that clones pets – cats, dogs and horses.
The cloning process begins with a visit to the vet’s office, where a biopsy sample is sent to the pet to be cloned.
“Once we get the sample, we do cell culture. We use some of the saved cells to create cloned embryos. Then they’re transplanted into surrogate mothers. And from there, it’s a normal pregnancy,” says Cody Lamb, who works with the bereaved owners.
The process of cloning Kelly’s cat took four years. But in the end she gets Bell – Chai’s clone.
“When I got the call that they had indeed cloned her, I think I was in shock. But she has quite different markings and a different personality from the late original. I love her very much and she is definitely like my cat, but the connection between us is not the same. But I never expected or wanted exactly this,” says Kelly Anderson.
“The feedback we get is that temperament and personality are quite similar, but the clones also have their own unique individualism,” the company added. Cloning isn’t cheap.
Kelly paid $25,000 six years ago, and the price has since doubled to $50,000, Voice of America (VOA) reports.
Some time ago, the hotel heiress Paris Hilton shared that she cloned her dog, from which she received two copies of him. Barbra Streisand also received two cloned dogs from her beloved Coton de Tulear.
The sudden death of Alexei Navalny, Russia’s most prominent opposition figure and a vocal critic of President Vladimir Putin, has sent shockwaves through the international community and Russia itself. Navalny, known for his relentless fight against corruption and his advocacy for democratic reforms, collapsed during a walk in Penal Colony No. 3 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug on February 16, 2024, as reported by the Russian state news agency RIA Novosti, citing the Department of the Federal Penitentiary Service.
Navalny‘s death has been met with a flurry of reactions, ranging from silence and controlled narratives within Russia to outright condemnation and calls for accountability from Western leaders and international organizations. The Kremlin’s response, as relayed by presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov, was to inform President Putin and defer to medical experts to determine the cause, while Navalny’s spokeswoman, Kira Yarmysh, has been left awaiting confirmation and details of the circumstances surrounding his demise.
Navalny’s return to Russia in 2021, following an attempt on his life via nerve agent poisoning—a claim substantiated by Western laboratories but denied by the Kremlin—underscored his commitment to his cause and country, despite the risks. His subsequent sentencing to 19 years and the designation of his Anti-Corruption Foundation as an “extremist organization” highlighted the increasingly repressive environment for dissent in Russia.
The directive from the pro-Kremlin party United Russia to lawmakers to refrain from commenting on Navalny’s death, as reported by independent Russian news outlet Agentstvo, and the anonymous insights from both former and current Russian government officials to Euractiv and The Moscow Times, respectively, suggest a complex interplay of fear, control, and acknowledgment of the harsh realities faced by prisoners like Navalny.
Internationally, Navalny’s death has been mourned as a stark reminder of the perils faced by those who challenge authoritarian regimes. Statements from France’s Foreign Minister Stephane Sejourne, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, and European Parliament President Roberta Metsola not only pay tribute to Navalny’s courage and resilience but also point to the Kremlin’s responsibility for creating the conditions leading to his death.
As the world grapples with the implications of Navalny’s passing, the call for a thorough investigation and accountability is clear. The narrative of Navalny’s life, marked by his unwavering pursuit of a more transparent and democratic Russia, stands in stark contrast to the silence and obfuscation surrounding his death. It is a tragic end that raises serious questions about the state of human rights and freedom of expression in Russia, and the international community’s role in supporting those who dare to speak out.
The legacy of Alexei Navalny, as a symbol of resistance against oppression and as a beacon of hope for many Russians, remains undiminished. His death may serve as a catalyst for renewed scrutiny of Russia’s human rights record and its treatment of political prisoners, ensuring that his fight for a better Russia continues even in his absence.
A new neighborhood in Grozny will be named after Russian President Vladimir Putin. This was announced by the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. On February 15, he got acquainted with the progress of the work in the central part of the city.
“Large-scale construction works are underway here, after the completion of which a new neighborhood will appear. It will bear the name of our national leader, the most prominent political figure of our time – Russian President Vladimir Putin,” Mr. Kadyrov wrote in Telegram.
According to him, the neighborhood will be located on an area of over 200 hectares. It will have 130 residential blocks, as well as mosques, kindergartens and other objects of the social infrastructure. The Chechen leader claims that there are already buyers for 40% of the homes under construction.
In 2008, Grozny’s central boulevard was renamed Putin boulevard. In addition, there are four districts in Grozny, which in 2020, by order of Ramzan Kadyrov, were renamed in honor of Chechen national heroes – these are Akhmatovsky, Baysangurovsky, Sheikh-Mansurovsky and Vyzatovsky districts.
Hidden within the depths of the Google app and Chrome browser lies a mighty content curator known as Discover. This personalized feed boasts the ability to bring users news and information that aligns with their interests. How does it work actually? What kind of impact does it have?
Tailored Content Consumption; Discover harnesses the data collection capabilities of Google to create a profile of each user’s preferences. By examining search history app activity, location data and even contact information, the algorithm identifies areas of interest and presents related articles, videos and images. This personalized approach sets it apart from news feeds that often rely on topics or user-selected subscriptions.
Benefits and Concerns; Supporters of Discover laud its ability to unearth gems and expose users to diverse perspectives. The convenience factor of curated content also saves time and mental energy compared to searching for information. However, there are lingering concerns, about filter bubbles and echo chambers. Since Discover primarily focuses on user preferences, there is a risk of reinforcing existing biases while limiting exposure to opposing viewpoints. Additionally, people raise questions about transparency due to the algorithm’s nature.
Impact on Content Creators; For website owners and publishers alike, inclusion in Discover can be both a blessing and a curse. On one hand, being featured in this feed can drive traffic and engagement for their content. On the other side, the algorithm’s prioritization of criteria may result in high-quality content not being discovered. Google provides guidelines to optimize content, for Discover. Keeping up with these changing algorithms can be quite challenging.
The Future of Discovery; As artificial intelligence and personalization continue to advance, Discover’s role in shaping how we consume information will likely expand. It is crucial to address concerns regarding bias and transparency while ensuring users have an enriching experience. Striking a balance between curation and user control remains a challenge.
Apart from these aspects, Discover raises questions about our relationship with information. Are we becoming too dependent on automated filters? What are the implications for thinking and exposure to perspectives? As we navigate the evolving realm of information, understanding how tools like Discover work becomes vital in making informed choices about consuming content.
This article serves as a starting point to delve into aspects of Discover. Like any technology, it is important to approach it recognizing both its benefits and drawbacks and ultimately making informed decisions regarding our engagement, with the presented information.
In a bid to fortify maritime safety and environmental protection, European Union negotiators have clinched an informal agreement to impose stringent measures to combat pollution from ships in European seas. The deal, encompassing a suite of initiatives to prevent and penalize various forms of pollution, signifies a significant leap towards fostering cleaner and safer maritime environments.
The agreement extends the ban on ship-discharged oil spills to encompass sewage, garbage, and residues from scrubbers. This expansion underscores a holistic approach to tackling pollution sources and underscores the imperative for rigorous regulations to shield marine ecosystems.
To ensure robust monitoring and enforcement, the agreement incorporates provisions for enhanced verification of pollution incidents. EU countries and the Commission will collaborate to bolster communication on pollution incidents, share best practices, and undertake follow-up actions. Notably, the agreement mandates digital verification of high-confidence alerts from the CleanSeaNet satellite system, with a target to verify at least 25% of alerts by national authorities.
A pivotal facet of the agreement is the introduction of effective and deterrent fines for ships found breaching pollution regulations. By instituting penalties commensurate with the gravity of offenses, the agreement aims to dissuade illegal discharges and instill accountability among ship operators. This emphasis on enforcement underscores the commitment to upholding environmental standards and ensuring a sustainable maritime future.
EP rapporteur Marian-Jean Marinescu underscored the significance of robust enforcement measures in safeguarding marine environments. He emphasized the need for advanced technologies, such as satellite monitoring and on-site inspections, to effectively combat illegal discharges. The dedication to cleaner seas, heightened accountability, and a sustainable maritime future underscores the collective endeavor to safeguard marine ecosystems and promote responsible maritime practices.
While the preliminary agreement awaits approval by the Council and Parliament, EU countries are expected to transpose the new rules into national legislation within 30 months. This timeline underscores the commitment to prompt implementation and underscores the urgency of addressing maritime pollution through coordinated regulatory frameworks.
The agreement on the revision of the directive on ship-source pollution forms part of the Maritime safety package introduced by the Commission in June 2023. This comprehensive package seeks to modernize and strengthen EU maritime regulations concerning safety and pollution prevention, reflecting a proactive approach to addressing environmental challenges in the maritime sector.
