President Metsola opened the 13-14 November plenary session in Brussels with a minute of silence for the victims of the flood tragedy in Spain.
Following the devastating floods that swept through towns in Valencia and other regions in Spain two weeks ago and have taken at least 223 lives, President Metsola led MEPs in a minute’s silence in honour of the victims. She said that Europe was in shock and in mourning, and that the EU was ready to help in any way during the process of recovery and rebuilding, including through more flexibility to get financial assistance moving.
Changes to the agenda
Wednesday
The European Council and Commission statements on Conclusions of the European Council meetings of October and November 2024 are removed from the agenda, due to the absence of the President of the European Council, Charles Michel.
A Commission statement on the devastating floods in Spain, the urgent need to support the victims, to improve preparedness and to fight the climate crisis is added as the first item on Wednesday’s agenda.
The European Council and Commission statements on EU-US relations in light of the outcome of the US presidential elections are changed into a Commission statement.
A Commission statement on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud is added to the agenda, and MEPs voted to wind up the debate with a resolution to be voted at the next part-session.
A Commission statement on Deplorable escalation of violence around the football match in the Netherlands and the unacceptable attacks against Israeli football fans is added as fifth item.
Thursday
Two requests for urgent procedure are added to the voting session, pursuant to Rule 170 (5), for the following legislative files:
Regional Emergency Support: RESTORE,
Specific measures under the EAFRD for Member States affected by natural disasters.
The sitting is extended to 22:00.
Corrigenda
Under Rule 251(4) of the EP Rules of Procedure, two corrigenda will be deemed approved unless a request is made by a political group or Members reaching at least the low threshold for them to put to the vote. You can find the relevant list on the plenary website.
Bergamo, ITALY, KINGNEWSWIRE // On Sunday, November 10, hundreds of Scientologists gathered to celebrate the 35th anniversary of the presence of the Church of Scientology Mission in Bergamo.
In fact, Scientology’s presence in Bergamo began in the early 1980s, when a small group of believers who attended the Church of Scientology in Milan decided to start spreading Scientology principles in their area on a permanent basis.
Since then, the group has grown significantly until the current mission was founded. A mission has the task of making the religion of Scientology known by providing information services that help a person take the first steps on that path of rediscovery and spiritual enlightenment that can be continued in a church such as the one that can be seen in Milan.
Welcoming the Scientologists and their guests who had arrived for the ceremony was Mrs Marta Riva, who has been a valued leader of the Bergamo mission for many years.
Immediately after her welcome, Mrs Nilupa, Warnakulasooriya, originally from Sri Lanka but resident in Italy for over 20 years, took the floor. She is a person who embodies the fundamental values of healthy and conscious growth, including the importance of educating her fellow citizens with moral values that help them face the difficulties of living and working far from home.
The values I have found in The Way to Happiness are universal,’ said Nilupa, ’I believe in the Values contained in The Way to Happiness that Mr. Hubbard has given us: it is an immense gift! I trust that the Programme you are implementing with The Way to Happiness will always be available to Everyone.’
The second guest, Mr. Franco Ravaglioli, vice-president of the Universal Peace Federation Italia, a non-governmental body recognised by the UN, spoke about the inter-religious activities that have been initiated in Bergamo and which involve representatives of different religious faiths, including the Church of Scientology. ‘Religions should cooperate with each other, but also work together with governments and civil society to build the world imagined by their founders,’ Ravaglioli said.
The third speaker was Dr. Daniel Sigua, journalist, TV host, entrepreneur, considered one of the most influential ‘Latino communicators’ in Italy, diplomat and founder of the first Latin American press agency in Italy and Europe. Thanks to his tireless commitment and contagious energy, he is inspiring many people to join the cause for a future where human rights are guaranteed for all.
‘Thanks to the Church of Scientology,’ said Dr Sigua, ’Today we have a community more aware and educated about human rights thanks to your Spanish-language resources and materials dedicated to promoting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.’
Closing the speeches was Mr Gabriele Riva, a Lieutenant of the Alpine troops and very active in his Bergamo community with social and humanitarian initiatives that have generated a greater sense of belonging and solidarity among his fellow citizens. Mr Riva wished to thank the Bergamasque Scientology community for the concrete help it has received on the occasion of the sight of 40 university students forming the choir of the University of the Philippines who also performed in honour of the families tragically affected by Covid during the pandemic.
After the ceremony, those present were able to visit the mission headquarters, which, besides being the place where people begin their journey of spiritual liberation, is also the meeting place for volunteers who have been engaged for years in information activities on the risks of drug use, one of the activities that has been carried out with continuity and effectiveness by the group of volunteers of the Bergamo community of Scientology.
Scientology has been present in Italy for 50 years, its 13 Churches and 20 Missions are caring for the spiritual progress of thousands of people of all ages, social classes and professions.
The first Church of Scientology was established by a group of believers in 1954, in Los Angeles, and there are now more than 11,000 churches, missions and groups in 167 countries worldwide.
The mystery of why a Russian beluga whale, which appeared years ago off the coast of Norway, was dressed in a harness and called a “spy”, may have finally been solved, the BBC reported.
A marine expert believes that the animal did escape from a Russian military base, but it is unlikely to have been a spy.
The tame beluga first made headlines in 2019 when it approached fishermen off Norway’s northern coast wearing a harness, sparking speculation that it was an escaped Russian “spy whale”.
According to the account of one of the fishermen at the time, the animal began to rub against their boat. He said he had heard of animals in distress that instinctively knew they needed help from humans and thought it was “one smart whale”.
Fishermen help the beluga free from the harness, after which it swims to the nearby port of Hammerfest, where it lives for several months.
Local residents call the animal Hvaldimir – a combination of the Norwegian word for whale – hval – and the Russian name Vladimir, BTA adds.
Seemingly unable to catch live fish to eat, the beluga charmed visitors by poking at their cameras and even in one case returned a cell phone.
Fascinated by the story of the whale, Norway is taking steps to have it watched and fed.
Now Dr. Olga Shpak, an expert on the species, says she believes the whale was indeed owned by the military and escaped from a naval base in the Arctic Circle. However, she does not believe that the beluga was a spy.
Shpak believes that she was trained to guard the base and escaped because she was a “bully”.
Russia has always refused to confirm or deny that the whale was trained by its military.
But Dr Shpak, who worked in Russia researching marine mammals from the 1990s until returning to her native Ukraine in 2022, told BBC News: “For me it’s 100 per cent (certainly )”.
Olga Shpak, whose account is based on conversations with friends and former colleagues in Russia, features in the BBC documentary Secrets of the Spy Whale, which is now on BBC iPlayer and was broadcast on BBC Two.
Dr. Shpak does not want to name her sources in Russia for their own safety, but says she was told that when the beluga surfaced in Norway, the Russian marine mammal community immediately identified it as one of theirs. Then, along the chain of vets and trainers, it was reported about the absence of an animal named Andrukha.
According to Dr. Shpak, Andrukha/Hvaldimir was first captured in 2013 in the Sea of Okhotsk in the Russian Far East. A year later, he was transferred from a facility owned by a dolphinarium in St. Petersburg to the military program in the Russian Arctic, where his trainers and vets kept in touch.
“I think when they started working in open water, trusting this animal (not to swim away), it just gave up on them,” she says.
Shpak learned from her sources that Andrukha was smart, so he was a good choice for training. At the same time, the whale was something of a “hooligan” – an active beluga, so they were not surprised that he refused to follow the boat and went where he wanted.
Satellite images from the Murmansk region in the Russian Arctic show whales that appear to be belugas in enclosures near a naval base.
“The location of the whales very close to submarines and surface ships may suggest that they are actually part of a security system,” said Thomas Nielsen of the Norwegian online newspaper The Barents Observer.
Unfortunately, the amazing story of Hvaldimir/Andruha does not have a happy ending. After learning to feed on its own, it spent several years traveling south along the coast of Norway, and in May 2023 was even spotted off the coast of Sweden.
Then on September 1, 2024, his body was found floating in the sea near the town of Risavika, on the southwest coast of Norway.
Although some activist groups have suggested that the whale was shot, this explanation has been rejected by Norwegian police. She reported that there was nothing to suggest that human activity was the cause of the beluga’s death. The autopsy found that Hvaldimir/Andrukha died after a stick was stuck in his mouth.
Illustrative Photo by Diego F. Parra: https://www.pexels.com/photo/a-beluga-whale-swimming-underwater-24243994/
Acts of the Apostles, chapter 12. 1 – 18. Herod persecutes the Church: the killing of James, the imprisonment of Peter and his miraculous release. 19 – 23. Death of Herod in Caesarea. 24 – 25. The return of Barnabas and Saul to Antioch.
Acts 12:1. At that time king Herod laid his hand on some of the church to do them evil,
“At that time,”–i.e. while Barnabas and Saul carried out the commission of the Antiochians (Acts 11:25, 30).
“King Herod”. This is Herod Agrippa I, son of Aristobulus and Veronica, grandson of Herod (called the Great), who sought to kill the Lord after His birth and killed the Bethlehem infants instead of Him (Matt. 2:1, 13), nephew of Herod Antipas of Galilee, the murderer of John the Baptist (Matt. 14ff.). Such was this family of murderers, who bloodied their hands with the most precious blood for Christians…
King Herod was born around 10 before Christ and grew up in Rome. After the accession of Emperor Caligula to the throne, he received the tetrarchy of his deceased uncle Philip (Matt. 2:22; Luke 3:1) and the tetrarchy of Lysanius (Luke 3:1) with the title of king. Soon he united under his authority the tetrarchy of his other uncle – Herod Antipas. Finally, the emperor Claudius, the successor of Caligula, added Judea to his dominions together with Samaria, so that he, like his grandfather, ruled all Palestine (Josephus, Jewish Antiquities, XVIII, 7, 2; XIX, 5, 1; 6, 1 ; the Jewish War II, 9, 6; 11, 5), in which there was no longer a separate Roman procurator over Palestine. Died in 44 sl. R. A.D., reigning no more than four years, after which Judea was again made a Roman province.
“He lifted up his hands… to do evil” – either by imprisonment, or by corporal punishment, or by other cruel measures, including murder, an example of which is given further on.
Acts 12:2. and killed Jacob the brother of John with the sword.
Jacob, the brother of John (Theologian) Zebedee became the second Christian martyr, on whom the Lord’s prediction was exactly fulfilled (Matt. 20:23). Complementing the short notice of the de-writer about his martyrdom, the church tradition tells that the one who accused the apostle was himself converted to Christ by the accused and was martyred together with him (Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History. II, 9). This is how Saint John Chrysostom exclaims: “no longer the Jews and not the Sanhedrin, but the king raises his hands to do evil. This is the highest authority, the most difficult bran, all the more so because it was in favor of the Jews”.
Acts 12:3. And when he saw that this pleased the Jews, he also seized Peter – then were the days of unleavened bread –
“Then were the days of unleavened bread” – the days of unleavened bread began on the day of the Passover and lasted for 7 days. If Herod usually resided in Caesarea, the residence of the Jewish rulers at the time, the mention of the days of unleavened bread makes it clear that Herod took advantage of his stay in Jerusalem for the Passover to persecute the Christians and imprison Peter to satisfy the Jews . The base calculation that guided him was to please as many people as possible with his actions: quite Herodian and worthy of those for whose sake the evil was done.
Acts 12:4. and, seizing him, cast him into prison, and delivered him to four quarters of soldiers to guard him, thinking after the Passover to bring him before the people.
“four quadruple soldiers,” i. four shifts of four people. Such increased security was placed only for particularly important criminals, and in the given case it did not fulfill its duties quite as expected, for “the more careful the guard, the more amazing was the revelation of God’s power…” ( blessed Theophylact of Ohrid).
“thinking after Passover.” On a festival as great as the Passover, no sentence of death or execution was allowed, and so Herod Agrippa wanted to condemn Peter after the festival was over.
“to bring him before the people” – for a solemn public trial, condemnation and capital punishment. A lover of spectacles, brought up by the bloody Roman spectacles, the king wanted to make a public spectacle out of the condemnation and execution of the first supreme apostle.
Acts 12:5. And so Peter was kept in prison; and at that time the church was constantly praying to God for him.
“And at that time the church was constantly praying to God for him.” From the remark it is clear that the miraculous deliverance of the apostle was granted mainly through the prayer of the Church for him. “They (i.e. the believers) were now in the most dangerous position. They were horrified both by the fact that he (Jacob) was killed and by the fact that he (Peter) was thrown into prison… But they did not get angry, did not raise a commotion, but turned to prayer, resorted to this invincible champion…” (Saint John Chrysostom).
Acts 12:6. And when Herod was about to bring him out, that night Peter slept between two soldiers, bound with two chains, and guards at the door guarded the dungeon.
“Through that night,” i. before the day when Herod wanted to try Peter “Peter was sleeping between two soldiers”, chained to them with two chains, as was the rule under a strong guard (Josephus, Jewish Antiquities, XVIII, 6, 7; Pliny, Er. X, 65 ).
Acts 12:7. And behold, an Angel of the Lord stood, and a light shone in the dungeon. The angel, pushing Peter in the side, woke him up and said: get up quickly! And the chains fell from his hands.
“A light shone in the dungeon” – φῶς ἔλαμψεν ἐν τῷ οἰκήματι. In the Slavic translation: “the world shines in xpamine” – perhaps not in the entire dungeon, but in that part of it where Peter slept.
“as he pushed Petra”. Peter’s sleep in those anxious minutes was so deep that only a movement could wake him. “You see,” says St. John Chrysostom, “Peter is asleep, he does not give in to despondency or fear.” That night, when they wanted to lead him to death, he slept, surrendering everything to God.”
Acts 12:8. Then the Angel said to him: gird up your tail and put on your shoes. So he did. Then he says to him: put on your clothes and follow me!
“Shut up and put on your shoes.” “Therefore he ordered him to gird himself and put on his shoes, to show him that he was not an apparition, so that Peter would wake up from his sleep and be convinced that it was true. Therefore at that moment the chains fell from his hands and he was told, “get up quickly.” These are words whose purpose is not to disturb, but to convince not to delay…” (Saint John Chrysostom).
Acts 12:9. Peter went out and followed him, and he did not know that what the Angel was doing was true, but thought he was seeing a vision.
Acts 12:10. When they had passed the first and second watch, they came to the iron enemy, who were leading into the city, and who opened themselves to them: they went out and crossed a street, and presently the Angel withdrew from him.
Acts 12:11 Then Peter, coming to himself, said: now I truly understood that the Lord sent His Angel and delivered me from the hands of Herod and from everything that the Jewish people expected.
Acts 12:12. And looking around, he went to the house of Mary, the mother of John, called Mark, where many were gathered and praying.
“John, called Mark”, who then accompanied Barnabas and Saul to Antioch (Acts 12:25). There are several different traditions about this John-Mark: according to some, he is the same person as the evangelist Mark and Mark, the nephew of Barnabas (Col. 4:10). Others distinguish it from St. Mark and the nephew of Barnabas. Third, distinguishing it from St. the apostle Mark, consider him a nephew of Barnabas. This disagreement, of course, cannot speak against the historical veracity of this account in the book of Acts.
Acts 12:13. When Peter knocked on the road enemy, a servant girl named Rhoda went to eavesdrop.
Acts 12:14. And, recognizing Peter’s voice, he did not open the door for joy, but ran and called that Peter was standing at the door.
Acts 12:15. And they told her: you are out of your mind! But she claimed it was. And they said: this is his Angel.
“You are out of your mind!” In Greek: μαίνῃ. In the Slavic translation: “are you mad?”, i.e. are you crazy So strange and incredible seemed the reported.
“This is his Angel.” As often happens when a person gets confused, faced with something improbable and inexplicable, he finds an explanation of what is happening that is no less difficult and wonderful, and just as little to explain the possibility of the incredible. The teaching about the guardian angel and the director of the salvation of every person could be based on and confirmed by the teaching of the Lord about the angels of infants. This teaching was also known to the apostle Paul (Hebrews 1:14).
Acts 12:16. At that time, Peter kept knocking. And when they opened it, they saw it and were amazed.
“when they opened” – no longer only the maidservant, but everyone gathered rushes to the newcomer and opens the door for him.
Acts 12:17. And he, making a sign with his hand to be silent, told them how the Lord had brought him out of the dungeon, and said: call Jacob and the brothers about this. And going out, he went to another place.
“call Jacob,” i. to the superior of the Jerusalem church, brother of the Lord “and to the brothers”, i.e. to the rest of the believers – to calm down.
“went to another place”, thereby showing prudent caution, which fully corresponded to the Lord’s instruction (Matt. 10:23). “He did not tempt God and did not put himself in danger, because they did this only when they were commanded…” (Saint John Chrysostom). There is an ancient tradition that Peter was in Rome during the first years of the reign of Claudius (Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History, II, 14–15). If this is so, then the most convenient time for Peter to make such a journey was precisely that. In all probability the journey took place in AD 44, after the Jewish Passover, in the fourth year of Claudius’ reign. After that, the writer does not speak about Peter again until the apostolic council (Acts 15).
During this time (several years) he was quite able to make the supposed journey – both for greater safety and because of his zeal to preach Christ in the very center of the life of the world at that time.
Acts 12:18. As he doubted, there was no small confusion among the soldiers, what had become of Peter.
Acts 12:19. And Herod, looking for him and not finding him, investigated the guards and ordered them to be put to death. After that he went down from Judea to Caesarea, and there he lived.
“He went down to Caesarea.” It was the then usual residence of the Roman governors of Judea. The Passover was over and Herod could leave Jerusalem. Moreover, it was now inconvenient for him to remain in the city, because he was ashamed of that part of the people, headed by the Sanhedrin, to whom he had promised a gratuitous spectacle of the apostle’s execution.
Acts 12:20. Herod was angry with the Tyrians and Sidonians; and they talked together, came to him and, having persuaded the king’s bed-bearer Vlasta to their side, begged for peace, because their country was fed from the king’s territory.
By describing Herod’s death immediately after the story of Peter’s release, the scribe wants to present this death as God’s punishment for Herod because of the persecution against Christ’s church.
“Herod was enraged” – for what reason is unknown.
“the king’s bedspread Power” – τὸν ἐπὶ τοῦ κοῦῶνος τοῦ βασιλέως. This is the chief servant of the king, the guardian of his life and treasures. Such officials very often became high dignitaries of the state, enjoying great influence over the king and state affairs (cf. Acts 8:27).
“begged for peace”. Friendly relations were especially necessary given the danger of starvation (St. John Chrysostom). The Phoenicians obtained most of their grain wheat from Palestine, as they themselves were primarily a trading rather than an agricultural people. Therefore, without war, Herod could do them too much harm, which forced them to beg him for peace.
Acts 12:21. On the appointed day, Herod put on a royal robe, sat on the throne, and spoke to them;
The reception of the envoys took place on a specially designated day of a solemn public audience.
“clothed himself in a royal garment” – according to Josephus’ account “woven of silver”.
Acts 12:22. and the people shouted: this is the voice of God, and not of man.
Acts 12:23. But suddenly an Angel of the Lord smote him, because he did not give glory to God; and he, eaten by worms, died.
The Jewish historian Josephus tells in sufficient detail about the circumstances of Agrippa’s death, with some details and differences (Jewish Antiquities, XIX, 8, 2; cf. Acts 18:6, 7) with a general similarity to the writer. According to Josephus, the king was present in Caesarea at the games in honor of Caesar; on one of these days, the reception of the king’s envoys could have taken place. His magnificent, silver-woven robes shone in the sun with dazzling brilliance; this gave reason also to the flatterers for the most immeasurable praises, in which they called him a god and entrusted themselves to his favor. The king, it seems, was heartened by such flattery, which immediately drew upon him the wrath of God: seeing an owl above him, he fell into a superstitious fear, and at the same time felt such a sharp pain in his stomach that he was immediately carried in his arms into the palace, where after five days of agony he died.
Agrippa’s fear of the owl is explained by the fact that in Rome a soothsayer predicted that he would die when he saw an owl above him for the second time. When this happened, Agrippa fell ill, remembering with horror the prediction. This explanation does not exclude the other, more serious, one of the writer, who says that the cause and beginning of the disease is the invisible defeat of Herod by an angel. The two narrators also do not contradict each other in indicating the duration of Herod’s torments – Josephus directly states five days, and Luke is less definite, saying: “eaten by worms, he died.”
The account of Herod’s death is important because of its chronological date (44), which allows us to determine the time of previous and subsequent events in the life of the church.
Acts 12:24. And the word of God grew and spread.
Acts 12:25. Barnabas and Saul, having fulfilled the commission, returned from Jerusalem (to Antioch), taking with them John, called Mark. Cf. Acts 11:28–30.
Source in Russian: Explanatory Bible, or Commentaries on all the books of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments: In 7 volumes / Ed. prof. A. P. Lopukhin. – Ed. 4th. – Moscow: Dar, 2009, 1232 pp.
Illustration: A rare icon of oil-painted St. Peter on gilt background with intricate tooling and decorated with a border of stippled flowers. Oil and gilt on wood panel. 48.2 x 38.3 cm (19 x 15 1/8 in.). Guilded wooden frame, 19th century.
The latest incident comes amid growing international concern over the use of capital punishment in the country since 2021, when the Taliban swept back into power 20 years on from the allied invasion that ended their rule, in the wake of the 11 September terrorist attacks in the United States.
Since the Taliban takeover of August 2021, the de facto authorities have reintroduced public executions, floggings and other forms of corporal punishment, despite international appeals to uphold human rights standards.
These practices have raised significant concerns among human rights experts and the international community.
The latest execution, which took place in Gardez, Paktya province, represents a “clear violation of human rights” and demonstrates an alarming pattern of public punishments, according to UN independent expert – or Special Rapporteur – who monitors human rights in Afghanistan, Richard Bennett.
“I condemn today’s horrific public execution,” Mr. Bennett said in a statement on social media, describing the incident as a clear human rights violation. “These atrocious punishments are clear violations of human rights and must be immediately halted”.
The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) emphasised that “executions carried out in public are contrary to Afghanistan’s international human rights obligations and must cease.” The Mission called on the de facto authorities to “establish an immediate moratorium on all executions with a view to abolition of the death penalty”.
“We also call for respect for due process and fair trial rights, in particular access to legal representation,” UNAMA stated.
Deteriorating rights situation
The public execution reflects a broader pattern of human rights deterioration in Afghanistan. The Taliban have issued more than 70 edicts, directives and decrees since their 2021 takeover, including limiting girls to primary level education, banning women from most professions and prohibiting them from using parks, gyms and other public places.
UN Women Executive Director Sima Bahous recently told the Security Council that “Afghanistan’s women do not only fear these oppressive laws, but they also fear their capricious application,” noting that “a life lived in such circumstance is truly incomprehensible”.
The UN Special Representative in Afghanistan and head of UNAMA Roza Otunbayeva reported in September that while the de facto authorities have “delivered a period of stability,” they are “exacerbating this crisis by policies that focus insufficiently on the real needs of its people.”
Valencia, November 13, 2024 // In a heartbreaking turn of events, the bodies of Izan and Rubén Matías, two young children swept away during the devastating DANA floods in Torrent, have been found lifeless near Catarroja, several kilometers from where they disappeared. The family, after days of agony, shared a poignant message: “Our little angels are now resting from the heavens.”
The boys, aged 3 and 5, went missing two weeks ago when torrential rains brought by the DANA (Isolated Depression at High Levels) hit their neighborhood in Torrent. It was an unforeseen tragedy—the children were in their home when a container carried by a passing trailer became unhinged, crashing violently into the room they were occupying. The impact sent both Izan and Rubén into the raging floodwaters, setting off a desperate search across the region.
Their disappearance mobilized not only local emergency teams, including the Spanish Military Emergency Unit (UME), but also community members and specialized rescue groups from around the world. Among the most notable were “Los Topos Aztecas,” a team of renowned Mexican rescuers, who joined the effort despite the daunting conditions, and who were working and assisted by the Scientology Volunteer Ministers who provided logistical support and aided, with many other citizen groups, in the relentless search operation.
Despite daily searches, hopes of finding the children alive slowly dwindled as the days wore on. The area was combed repeatedly, with experts estimating the possible path of the floodwaters to track down the missing boys. Yesterday, the exhaustive search came to a tragic conclusion when both bodies were located together, several kilometers downstream from the house they had once played in.
The story of Izan and Rubén has captured the hearts of many, highlighting both the fragility of life in the face of natural disasters and the extraordinary lengths that people will go to in times of crisis. Rescue teams worked day and night, enduring the challenges of muddy waters and unpredictable weather conditions, hoping against hope for a miracle that never came.
Among the different organizations that assisted, the role of “Los Topos Aztecas” stood out for their bravery, with the seasoned Mexican team arriving in Spain as soon as news of the disaster spread. Their dedication was matched by the “Scientology Volunteer Ministers,” who provided critical coordination, distributing resources and assisting families and teams on the ground.
Although the outcome has been a tragic one, the collective response to the disappearance of Izan and Rubén is a testament to the humanity that surfaces in times of need. Local residents, professional rescue units, and international teams all worked together tirelessly, exemplifying a community united by love and compassion. While the children could not be saved, the dedication of those involved brought some small measure of closure to the grieving family.
“Our hearts are broken, but we’re forever grateful to those who never stopped looking for our boys,” said a family member through tears. As Valencia mourns the loss of these two young lives, the community’s resilience stands as a reminder that, even amidst devastation, people come together—strangers turned allies in a fight against despair.
The European Commission has proposed a new digital portal that will make it easier for companies to temporarily send workers to other EU countries. This proposal aims to simplify the paperwork involved in moving employees—known as ‘posted workers’—to different member states, reducing the burden on businesses while keeping worker protections strong.
The EU’s Single Market includes around 5 million posted workers. These are employees who are sent by their companies to work in a different EU country for a short period of time. Right now, companies face a lot of paperwork, as each EU country has its own rules and forms that need to be completed. This can be complicated and costly, particularly for small businesses that may not have the resources to deal with the complex bureaucracy.
The new portal aims to create a single digital form that can be used across all EU countries. This means that companies will no longer need to fill out 27 different national forms when posting workers, but instead, they can use one standardized form available in all EU languages. The Commission believes that this will reduce the time needed for these declarations by 73%, cutting down the administrative costs for businesses.
How Will This Benefit Businesses and Workers?
The new digital portal will be part of the Internal Market Information System (IMI), which EU countries already use to share information about labor and services. This proposal is voluntary for member states, meaning each country can decide whether or not to use the new system. However, for those that do opt in, it will significantly reduce the paperwork needed when companies post workers across borders.
For businesses, this means a more streamlined process, saving both time and money. It contributes to the EU’s broader goal of reducing administrative burdens for companies by 25%, as outlined in its “Long-term competitiveness of the EU” strategy.
For workers, the new system will ensure that companies comply with existing worker protection laws. The streamlined process will also make it easier for labor authorities in each country to conduct inspections and enforce worker rights, improving compliance and transparency.
Protecting Workers’ Rights
The EU is committed to making sure that workers’ rights are protected, even when they are working temporarily in another country. By simplifying the process for declaring posted workers, the new system aims to ensure that companies follow all the rules set out in the Posting of Workers Directive. This directive ensures that posted workers receive fair treatment, such as appropriate wages and working conditions, similar to local workers.
With the digital portal, member states can also share information more effectively. Authorities will be better equipped to track postings and conduct targeted inspections, ensuring that companies are not bypassing important worker protections.
A Step Toward Fair Mobility
This proposal is part of a broader EU plan to support labor mobility and tackle worker shortages. It was initially announced in the 2020 New Industrial Strategy and was further emphasized in a 2024 action plan to address labor and skills shortages. By making it easier for companies to post workers, the EU hopes to promote fair mobility—meaning workers can move across borders for jobs without losing their rights or facing complicated paperwork.
Summary
The proposed digital portal is designed to simplify the process for companies to send workers to other EU countries, reducing administrative burdens and improving transparency. This is expected to benefit both businesses, by cutting costs, and workers, by ensuring strong protection of their rights. By making it easier to comply with EU rules, the new system aims to make labor mobility fairer and more efficient, while supporting businesses in a competitive global market.
Burguera, November 13, 2024 — A severe weather alert has led to intensified mobility restrictions across 20 municipalities in the Comunitat, as authorities respond to the ongoing atmospheric conditions. The restrictions will be in effect from 6 PM today until 6 PM tomorrow, particularly affecting areas impacted by the DANA (Depresión Aislada en Niveles Altos) event that occurred on October 29.
The municipalities under these restrictions include Alaquàs, Albal, Aldaia, Alfafar, Algemesí, Alginet, Benetússer, Beniparrell, Catarroja, Chiva, Guadassuar, L’Alcùdia, Llocnou de la Corona, Massanasa, Paiporta, Picanya, Sedaví, Torrent, Valencia (southern districts), and Xirivella. These areas are primarily located in the regions of l’Horta Sud, Ribera Alta, and Hoya de Buñol.
Authorities have implemented these temporary and exceptional measures to ensure the safety of residents amid the adverse weather conditions, which have prompted a yellow and orange alert in various zones.
Exceptions to the Mobility Restrictions
While the restrictions are stringent, there are exceptions for urgent travel that is adequately justified. These exceptions include:
Medical Assistance: Travel to healthcare centers, services, and establishments.
Return to Residence: Individuals returning to their habitual or family residence.
Care for Vulnerable Individuals: Assistance and care for the elderly, minors, dependents, individuals with disabilities, or other vulnerable persons.
Force Majeure: Travel due to emergencies or situations of necessity.
Other Justified Activities: Any other activities of a similar nature, provided they are properly documented.
As the situation develops, residents are urged to stay informed and adhere to the guidelines set forth by local authorities to ensure their safety and that of others during this challenging weather event.
Today, the Commission has revealed the winners of the 2024-25 European Capital of Innovation Awards (iCapital), celebrating a decade of recognising cities that lead the way in delivering innovative solutions for their citizens. This year’s top prizes, funded under the EU research and innovation programme Horizon Europe, were awarded to the cities of Torino and Braga.
Torino showcases a comprehensive approach to experimentation and innovation, leveraging its rich history and industrial heritage to tackle both present and future urban challenges. Braga has developed a range of innovative solutions, from tech-based clusters to cultural and creative industries, and established a strong innovation ecosystem with a focus on collaboration and inclusivity.
The award ceremony took place on 13 November 2024 in Lisbon at the Web Summit, one of the world’s largest technology events. Commissioner Iliana Ivanova handed the awards to cities that have embedded innovation into daily urban life, advancing sustainable, inclusive, and resilient communities. The ceremony brought together the mayors from winning cities and past iCapital winners.
In addition to the main category winners, the Commission has announced the 1st and 2nd runners-up for each category:
The European Capital of Innovation category winner, Torino, has received a €1 million prize, while the two runners-up have been awarded €100 000 each. The European Rising Innovative City category winner, Braga, has received €500,000, and the two runner-up cities have each been granted €50,000.
Background
Supported by the European Innovation Council (EIC) under Horizon Europe, the European Capital of Innovation Awards – also known as iCapital – celebrate cities with dynamic, inclusive innovation ecosystems. The competition acknowledges those urban centres that successfully connect citizens, academic institutions, businesses, and public authorities to drive transformative change.
This year celebrates the tenth anniversary of the iCapital Awards. The prize first took place in 2014. Past winners include Barcelona (2014), Amsterdam (2016), Paris (2017), Athens (2018), Nantes (2019), Leuven (2020), Dortmund (2021), Aix-Marseille Provence Metropole (2022) and Lisbon (2023) as European Capitals of Innovation. Past winners in the Rising Innovative city category include Vantaa (2021), Haarlem (2022) and Linköping (2023).
iCapital is one of the five EIC Prizes granted under Horizon Europe. The prize is open to cities from all EU member states and countries associated to Horizon Europe and it is managed by the European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency. The winners are chosen following an assessment performed by two high-level juries of independent experts.
What is the place of women in the church and in life in general? After all, the Orthodox view is a special view. And the opinions of different priests can differ greatly from each other (even if we do not take into account the misogynist Tkachev) – someone sees Delilah and Herodias in women, someone – myrrh-bearers.
In the world created by God, a man and a woman are two absolutely equal parts of a single whole: the world simply could not exist if they did not complement each other.
It is this unity that the Apostle Paul emphasizes, speaking about the earthly segment of human history: “the two will become one flesh.”
If we talk about eternity, then in it, according to the words of the same Paul: “there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” And this is the same unity, but in its exclusive fullness (“marriage is only a prophetic image of the future century, of humanity in slalu naturae integrae [in a state of integral nature]” – Pavel Evdokimov).
As for the role of women… There is an interesting moment in the Gospel, which for some reason is traditionally ignored by Orthodox (and perhaps other Christian) preachers.
We know that Christ was born of Mary. She became the focus in which the thousand-year history of the Jewish people converged. All the prophets, patriarchs and kings of the people of Israel lived so that at some point this young girl would agree to become the mother of God and give Him the opportunity to save us all.
God did not use her as a “walking incubator” (which is what Orthodox pastors seriously see as the purpose of women), did not deceive her, as Zeus did with Alcmene, Leda or Danae, He chose her as the mother of His Son and gave her the right to freely respond with consent or refusal.
All this is common knowledge. But few people pay attention to the fact that there is no place for a man in this story.
There is God and a woman who save the world. There is Christ, who, dying on the cross, conquers death and redeems humanity with his blood. And there is Mary, standing at the cross of her Divine Son, whose “weapon pierces the soul.”
And all the men are somewhere out there – feasting in palaces, judging, making sacrifices, betraying, shaking with hatred or fear, preaching, fighting, teaching.
They have their own role in this “divine tragedy”, but at this culmination of human history, the main role is played by two – God and Woman.
And true Christianity by no means reduced the entire role of a woman to the birth of children and household chores.
For example, St. Paula, a highly educated woman, helped Blessed Jerome in his work on translating the Bible.
The monasteries of England and Ireland in the 6th and 7th centuries became centers for the training of erudite women who were knowledgeable in theology, canon law, and wrote Latin poetry. St. Gertrude translated the Holy Scriptures from Greek. Female monastic orders in Catholicism carried out a wide variety of social services.
From an Orthodox perspective on the matter, a useful synthesis is provided by a document from the year 2000 – “Fundamentals of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church”, approved by the Holy Synod of Bishops, in the year of the Great Jubilee, at the border between the millennia.
The foundations of the social concept of the Russian Orthodox Church are intended to serve as a guide for synodal institutions, dioceses, monasteries, parishes and other canonical church institutions in their relations with state power, with various secular organizations, with non-church mass media. On the basis of this document, the ecclesiastical Hierarchy adopts decisions on various issues, the relevance of which is limited within the boundaries of individual countries or to some short period of time, as well as when the subject of consideration is sufficiently private. The document is included in the educational process of the spiritual schools of the Moscow Patriarchate. In accordance with the changes in state and social life, the emergence of new problems in this area, which are important for the Church, the foundations of its social concept can be developed and improved. The results of this process are confirmed by the Holy Synod, by Local or Bishops’ Councils:
X. 5. In the pre-Christian world there existed the idea of woman as an inferior being compared to man. The Church of Christ revealed the dignity and vocation of women in all their fullness by giving them a deep religious justification, which found its peak in the veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary. According to Orthodox teaching, the blessed Mary, blessed among women (Luke 1:28), manifested in herself that highest degree of moral purity, spiritual perfection and holiness to which man can rise and which surpasses in dignity the ranks of angels. In her person, motherhood is sanctified and the importance of the feminine is affirmed. The mystery of the Incarnation takes place with the participation of the Mother of God, as she participates in the work of salvation and rebirth of man. The Church deeply honors the evangelical myrrh-bearing women, as well as the numerous Christian figures glorified by the feats of martyrdom, confession and righteousness. From the very beginning of the existence of the ecclesiastical community, women actively participated in its organization, liturgical life, missionary work, preaching, education and charity.
Valuing highly the social role of women and welcoming their political, cultural and social equality with men, at the same time the Church opposes tendencies to belittle the role of women as wife and mother. The fundamental equality of dignity of the sexes does not eliminate their natural differences and does not mean the identification of their vocation both in the family and in society. In particular, the Church cannot misinterpret the words of St. app. Paul about the special responsibility of the man who is called to be “head of the woman” and to love her as Christ loves His Church or about the call of the woman to submit to the man as the Church submits to Christ (Eph. 5 :22-33; Col. 3:18). Here, of course, we are not talking about the despotism of the man or the fortification of the woman, but about the primacy of responsibility, care and love; it should also not be forgotten that all Christians are called to obey “one another in the fear of God” (Eph. 5:21). Therefore, “neither a man without a woman, nor a woman without a man, is in the Lord.” For as the woman is from the man, so the man is through the woman, and everything is from God” (I Cor. 11:11-12).
Representatives of some social currents tend to downplay, and sometimes even deny the importance of marriage and the institution of the family, paying attention mainly to the social importance of women, including activities that are slightly compatible or even incompatible with female nature (such as for example work involving heavy physical labor). The frequent calls for an artificial equalization of the participation of men and women in all spheres of human activity. The Church sees the purpose of woman not simply in imitating man or competing with him, but in developing her God-given abilities, which are inherent only in her nature. By not emphasizing only the system of distribution of social functions, Christian anthropology places women in a much higher place than modern non-religious ideas. The desire to destroy or minimize natural division in the public sphere is not inherent in ecclesiastical reason. Gender differences, as well as social and ethical ones, do not hinder access to the salvation that Christ has brought to all people: “There is no longer Jew, nor Greek; there is no longer slave, nor free; neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28). At the same time, this sotiological statement does not imply the artificial unification of human diversity and should not be mechanically applied to all public relations.
