10.1 C
Brussels
Friday, November 1, 2024
Home Blog Page 1506

EU-China relations at the crossroads

0
EU-China relations at the crossroads

EU-China relations have reached a phase of ‘co-opetition’, in which the EU has identified China at the same time as a cooperation and negotiating partner, economic competitor, and systemic rival. The most recent EU-China Summit on 22 June, which took place through video conference, clearly exemplified a more tense relationship, without a joint statement being released.

Without being naive, the EU may not be in a position to linger for too long, given China’s particular economic and geo-political importance. It is key for the EU to make its 27 Member States speak on China with one voice, especially during these challenging post-COVID-19 times. In a dialogue with Istvan Ujhelyi MEP, Vice-Chair of the European Parliament’s Committee on Transport and Tourism, we discuss the future of EU-China Relations.

Challenging times ahead

The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic has had a major influence on our daily life and will surely affect the international community and EU-China relations on the short, middle and long term. This moment is of utmost importance to determine the future direction of EU-China relations. It is far from a great secret that there is no single EU stance, or even a clear and obvious position within the main institutions of the European Union on what its redefined position should be based, or whether repositioning is necessary at all. No single country around the globe is able to manage the new types of challenges we are facing, such as global warming or outbreaks of new pandemics like COVID-19, in which a world order based on cooperation instead of division is to be pursued.

There is a great division in the European Parliament on China and EU-China relations between and within the political groups. However, Europe and China need each other as stable partners in this increasingly unstable global political arena. While both partners’ relations with the US are becoming more tense, China still emerges as a natural partner. The EU and China share the interest to maintain a well-balanced relationship based on cooperation, trust and reciprocity. However, simultaneously there is a growing political need in given EU Member States and political groups to determine how the EU can find a sensitive balance between protecting its strategic economic interests while deepening its cooperation with global partners, especially in harder policy fields such as trade and technology. There is a major debate ongoing within the European Parliament on the question of 5G, artificial intelligence, human rights, and minorities.

Nevertheless, there are numerous areas which could serve as a basis for enhanced inter alia cooperation, such as the fight against global warming and increased action against global terrorism. For instance, the EU’s green ambitions and fight against climate change, manifested in the Green Deal, are engaging the EU and China as neutral partners in a well-established bilateral partnership, also at the multilateral level.

Yet, as the old saying goes, every coin has two sides, as exemplified by the most recent (online) EU-China Summit. The fact that there was no joint statement was neither the best possible outcome, nor political message. However, as President von der Leyen clearly stated afterwards, the summit was only the starting point of a further process requiring greater reciprocity and trust. As this was the von der Leyen-Michel-Borrell trio’s first EU-China Summit, amidst a global health and economic crisis, in an extremely turbulent global political environment, it is fair to say that a great number of areas have been addressed properly. In particular international trade, climate change, international peace and security, in addition to COVID-19 responses.

The relationship with China is multifaceted and greatly depends on the policy area. The same ally can be a “cooperation partner” in addressing climate change, while also being in parallel, a “systemic rival” when it comes to political systems. However, enhanced cooperation is the only way to properly address global challenges. A significant milestone in trade policy could be reached by the end of 2020, if an adequate level of political will is provided by both sides to conclude the negotiations of the EU and China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI).

Can the EU speak on China with one voice?

This being a well-known criticism, the treaties provide the EU with limited competences and room for manoeuvre in the field of foreign policy, besides the challenges provided by the currently applied decision-making process in the Council. This is especially the case when the interests of one given Member State clash with the EU’s position represented by the rest of the Member States, leaving the EU to act too little or too late in the field of foreign affairs. The EU’s (in)capability to speak with one voice is not a China specific issue, but there is an urgent and pressing need for a stronger and more united EU voice. However, it is up to the Member States to realise this and act upon it. China’s relation with any of the EU Member States must be based on transparency and trust across governments and political forces in order to be mutually beneficial in the long term.

Global challenges such as terrorism, global warming or the current Covid-19 crisis know no border, culture, religion, race, or ethnicity. Due to the nature of these threats, solutions are to be based on cooperation, multilateralism and solidarity. Understanding each other’s culture and history remains the key to building long-term relationships and developing healthy and balanced societies. People-to-people cooperation should therefore be further strengthened, as partnership in the fields of science, culture, education and tourism (a sector majorly hit by the pandemic) could lead to enhanced mutual understanding, with spill-over effects in more sensitive hard policy issues such as trade or economics. Bridges should also be built on a personal level, both through bottom-up and top-down approaches in order to advance common objectives. Another key sector of cooperation is connectivity. In 2015 the Joint EU-China Connectivity Platform was established to further strong and mutually beneficial relations in the area of transport, and to enhance synergies between for example the EU’s Trans-European Transportation Network and China’s Belt and Road Initiative, while serving as a tool for enhanced transparency, reciprocity and an ensured level playing field in the transport industry, focusing on low-emission transport technologies and solutions, especially in boosting transportation over land.

Every global superpower is eager to increase its regional and global influence by combining different tools and assets. China’s attempts to gain greater influence manifests itself in many forms, including cultural diplomacy, strategic investments and infrastructure development projects (through the Belt and Road Initiative), and stepping up their efforts in establishing English-language media outlets. China and the EU need a balanced relation, based on trust, friendship, and reciprocity, especially in these current turbulent times. EU Member States are growing increasingly wary of Chinese economic influence, while Brussels also needs to protect its own strategic companies, sectors and European manufacturers. China should, however, refrain from trying to play Member States against each other, as despite the challenging times ahead, China and the EU remain natural partners above systemic rivals.


Interview with MEP Istvan UJHELYI

By Lin Goethals, Programme Director at the European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS) in Brussels, in collaboration with the Center for European Studies at the Shanghai Institute of Social Sciences.

Towards a consensus on safe schooling in the WHO European Region during the COVID-19 pandemic

0
Towards a consensus on safe schooling in the WHO European Region during the COVID-19 pandemic

Following a high-level meeting with representatives of Member States hosted by WHO/Europe and the Ministry of Health, Italy, on schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic

Joint statement by  Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge, WHO Regional Director for Europe and Roberto Speranza, Minister of Health of Italy

31 August 2020

Our communities continue to deal with many uncertainties brought by the new COVID-19 reality. Following the initial phase of the pandemic, we have been able to ease lockdown measures and develop a more sophisticated understanding about how we can remain safe.

With caution, we are reopening societies and as we do so, we must explore how to safely reopen schools for our children.

COVID-19 has created the largest disruption of education systems in history, affecting nearly 1.6 billion learners in more than 190 countries, and our region is no exception. Most countries in the Region closed schools to assist with the containment of the virus. While this was vital, as we transition to reopening, we must now determine how to open schools in the Region, safely.

School closures can have a profound effect on the health and well-being of children

Although children can contract and transmit COVID-19, they have largely been spared from the direct health effects of the virus, with most cases of COVID-19 in children being mild or asymptomatic. Despite this, they continue to be negatively impacted by school closures, both in terms of their education and their health – including their mental health, social development and the risk and impact of being in an abusive home environment.

The vulnerable and deprived carry the heaviest burden of school closures

The harmful effects of the pandemic have not been distributed equally. Children living in vulnerable situations continue to be disproportionately affected in relation to their long-term health outcomes and challenges with distance learning, both due to digital poverty and difficulties for parents being able to assist in the learning process.

Challenges in accessing educational support have also been more profound for children with underlying health conditions and children living with disabilities.

Addressing these disparities must be central to any efforts to reopen schools safely.

Today we met to find a way forward

We recognize that many parents, educators and children themselves have several concerns and anxieties about going to school during these times. So, today we met virtually with representatives of Member States to develop a framework to ensure the safety and well-being of children, their families and communities.
We would like to reconfirm that our discussions are guided by the best interests of the child and overall public health considerations, informed by cross-sectoral and context-specific evidence.

Measures to be considered

We agreed that there is a wide array of measures that can be considered for risk reduction in school settings and propose the following considerations:

  • Protective measures relating to hand hygiene, physical distancing, use of masks where appropriate, and staying at home if sick are cornerstones of safe schooling within the COVID-19 reality.
  • Specific policies will need to be in place for at-risk children with special learning needs or health conditions, as well as for educators with health conditions that render them vulnerable to more severe infection.
  • It is realistic to prepare and plan for online learning to be available to complement school-based learning in the coming scholastic year. This will be necessary during temporary closures, can be an alternative for children and educators with health conditions, may be needed during episodic quarantine and may complement school-based learning in circumstances where children alternate school presence to respect physical distancing needs in smaller classrooms.
  • The important link between health and education sectors will continue to grow as we navigate the new post-COVID-19 reality. We are committed to working across sectors to meet the needs of children.

Our commitment

In placing the issue of schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic on the top of our agenda, we are indeed showing that we want to ensure that children and adolescents are not left behind as the world continues to grapple with this pandemic. We commit to:

  • building a coalition across our Member States to inform our actions and move forward jointly to implement the best possible measures on the provision of safe schooling for all, including our children;
  • agreeing to a unified set of data to learn more about the impact of COVID-19 on children, their families and communities to better inform future policy;
  • preserving equity as a core guiding principle to ensure underserved populations are not further disadvantaged.

We also sincerely appreciate the tireless efforts of teachers and parents who have preserved childhood and, despite the obstacles, provided children with access to ongoing learning, and our health workers who continue to keep our communities safe.

Following this meeting, our focus is to deliver to our citizens a feasible and realistic framework for managing the reopening of schools.

We cannot let children become the hidden victims of this pandemic by denying them the opportunities they so fundamentally deserve.

Thank you

Top Turkish diplomat, EU foreign policy chief discuss East Med

0
Top Turkish diplomat, EU foreign policy chief discuss East Med
ISTANBUL- Anadolu Agency

Turkey‘s Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu on Aug. 30 spoke to EU’s foreign policy chief over the phone over latest developments in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Çavuşoğlu and Josep Borrell discussed regional developments amid heightened tensions between Greece and Turkey over energy exploration, according to diplomatic sources.

Greece has disputed Turkey’s current energy exploration in the Eastern Mediterranean, trying to box in Turkish maritime territory based on small islands near the Turkish coast.

Turkey- the country with the longest coastline on the Mediterranean- has sent out drilling ships to explore for energy on its continental shelf, saying that both Turkey and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) have rights in the region.

Beijing Book Fair Makes Virtual Pivot

0
Beijing Book Fair Makes Virtual Pivot

The 27th edition of the Beijing International Book Fair (BIBF), which would have taken place at the China International Exhibition Center from August 26 to August 30, kicked off its virtual version last week.

The first phase of a year-long “Smart BIBF,” programming began August 26 with the launch of Smart Rights Link and the BIBF Global Reading Festival. More than 1,000 exhibitors from 68 countries have registered for Smart Rights Link and uploaded more than 23,000 titles. Some 400,000 titles are expected to be available through the platform, which will remain operational until December 31. Online meetings for rights negotiations can be arranged until October 26. Smart BIBF also offers three business-matchmaking round tables—China-Asia, China-Europe, and China-America—that will take place on September 28, 29, and 30, respectively.

The Global Reading Festival, meanwhile, provides free livestreamed events from more than 100 publishing houses and cultural institutions from around the world, including the British Library on its classic collection.

In recent years, the U.K. has had the biggest overseas contingent at BIBF, and this has not changed with the virtual fair: more than 53 U.K. companies have registered and 1,200 titles uploaded for rights negotiation. The fair also boasts 97 new exhibitors, including 10 publishers from Latin America—including AZ Editora (from Argentina), Amanuense (Uruguay), and Somplemente (China)—as well as those from Armenia and Cape Verde. For these new exhibitors, the savings on airfares and accommodations, in addition to having the convenience of a virtual platform, are the major attractions.

Signs of Book Sales Improvement

As the virtual fair began, industry professionals were also watching results of China’s first major shopping festival of the year. Organized by JD.com, China’s second-largest e-commerce company, the 618 Shopping Festival, which ran from June 1 to June 18 (hence the name “618”), is a significant barometer on consumer spending and confidence.

Compared to the previous festival, sales of children’s books and educational titles for elementary and middle schools went up 43% and 40%, respectively. Sales of translated titles increased 57% while e-books experienced a huge sales boost. The Chinese edition of DK Natural History: The Ultimate Visual Guide to Everything on Earth was the #1 title on the bestseller list, which also saw Rhonda Byrne’s The Secret and a 40-volume Detective Sherlock Holmes illustrated series for primary school student among the top 10. As for e-books, the Harry Potter Complete Series dominated the sales chart.

In the January-June 2020 period, book sales via online channels went up 17.9% while sales at bricks-and-mortar bookstores declined 31.7% compared to the same period in the previous year, according to Centrin Ecloud, a Shanghai-based big-data platform for China’s publishing industry. The report showed indications that bookstore sales were improving, with data for May and June showing that sales at physical bookstores were at 80% (or above) of pre-pandemic levels.

Two categories showed the biggest year-on-year growth during the January–June period: sales of picture books rose 69.4% and sales of children’s encyclopedia/reference titles at 42.95%. The growth in these categories was directly attributed to the closure of kindergartens, parks, and libraries throughout the country, which boosted more parent-child reading activities at home. But with classroom education shifting to online during the Covid-19 outbreak, sales of textbooks and supplementary materials dropped significantly. The postponement of various examinations also affected the sales of test guides and exam preparation materials.

The Centrin report noted that only 42,763 new titles entered the Chinese book market during the first six months of 2020, marking a 27.7% decline compared the the same period last year. This was mostly due to publishers’ delaying new releases in light of the uncertainties caused by the pandemic and the resulting economic slowdown. The next six months, the report stated, will see Chinese publishers accelerating their programs to make up for the time (and revenue) lost.

Despite Assassinating 1,000s, MKO Sheltered by U.S., EU

0
Despite Assassinating 1,000s, MKO Sheltered by U.S., EU

TEHRAN (Dispatches) – Iran has hit out the U.S. and the EU for harboring the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (MKO or MEK) terrorist group, which has murdered thousands of Iranians.

“Aug. 29, the national Day of Fight Against Terrorism, is the time to remember Prz Rajai & PM Bahonar who, 39yrs ago today, were martyred in a bombing by the MEK terrorist group. Despite assassinating 1000s Iranians & fighting alongside Saddam, MEK is sheltered by the US & EU,” Iran’s Foreign Ministry said in a tweet on Saturday, commemorating the national Day of Fight Against Terrorism.

The occasion is named after the 1981 assassination of then president Muhammad Ali Rajaei and prime minister Muhammad Javad Bahonar.
The two and several other officials had convened at the Tehran office of the Iranian prime minister in a meeting of Iran’s Supreme Defense Council when a bomb explosion ripped through the building.

Survivors said an aide, identified as Massoud Kashmiri, had brought a briefcase into the conference room and then left.

Subsequent investigations revealed that Kashmiri was an MKO operative, who had infiltrated the then-prime minister’s office disguised as a state security official.

The MKO has conducted numerous assassinations and bombings against Iranian statesmen and civilians since the 1979 victory of Iran’s Islamic Revolution. Its members fled Iran in 1986 for Iraq, where they enjoyed Saddam’s backing.

Out of the nearly 17,000 Iranians killed in terrorist assaults since the Revolution, about 12,000 have fallen victim to the MKO’s acts of terror.
The anti-Iran cult was on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations until 2012. Major European countries, including France, have also removed it from their blacklists.

Simon Coveney understood to be most likely nominee for EU commissioner role

0
Simon Coveney understood to be most likely nominee for EU commissioner role

The Government has not yet decided if it will nominate two candidates for the post of EU commissioner despite a request from president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen to put forward one man and one woman.

                                                    <p class="no_name">Senior Government sources believe it is increasingly likely the Government will nominate one candidate instead with the current Minister for Foreign Affairs <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Simon+Coveney">Simon Coveney</a> seen as the frontrunner.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name"><a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=Fine+Gael">Fine Gael</a> MEP Mairead McGuinness confirmed on Sunday that she would be interested in succeeding <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Phil+Hogan">Phil Hogan</a> as Ireland’s European Commissioner and suggested it would be “unwise” for the Government not to put forward both male and female candidates for the role.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">A spokeswoman for the Government said that the three party leaders met on Friday to discuss the issue and would meet again on Monday, and there had also been contacts over the weekend.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“It is in everyone’s interest to fill the vacancy as soon as possible but there is a process in <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_location=Brussels">Brussels</a> as well with president and parliament.” </p>
                                                    <h4 class="crosshead">‘Difficult patch’</h4><p class="no_name">Mr Hogan resigned from his position following controversy over his attendance at an Oireachtas golf society dinner and questions around his movements throughout Ireland before and afterwards in apparent breach of Covid-19 guidelines. </p>
                                                                                                        <aside class="related-articles--instream has-3"/><p class="no_name">Speaking on Sunday, Ms McGuinness said she was interested in the role. “My name is in circulation and yes I’m interested in being the commissioner,” she said on the This Week programme on RTÉ Radio 1. </p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“But, as we all know, the decision is a government’s decision. We’ve been through quite a difficult patch over the last couple of days. Our name in <a class="wpil_keyword_link " href="https://europeantimes.news/category/europe/"  title="Europe" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked">Europe</a> is being spoken of in ways we would rather it wasn’t. </p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“The president of the commission was very clear that she wants nominations soon so that we can move on from the place we are in. There are a lot of other names there as well, but my name is among them.</p>

                                                    <p class="no_name">“I think we need to listen very carefully to what the president of the commission Ursula von der Leyen has actually said. She wants the Government to act swiftly, and she wants two names. She wants a woman and a man.” </p>
                                                    <h4 class="crosshead">‘In the mix’</h4><p class="no_name">Ms McGuinness said nobody from Government circles had sounded her out about the position yet, but admitted she been in contact with one senior figure for advice on the matter. </p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“I think because of my position as first vice-president of the parliament that my name was in the mix early on,” she said. “I spoke to one person who is a good friend of mine for advice.”</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">In relation to Ireland’s chances of retaining the key trade portfolio, Ms McGuinness said there was too much emphasis on that aspect of the discussion in Ireland. </p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“This is about someone who is committed to Europe,” she said. “I think we have forgotten that here in Ireland. We have focused on Ireland’s interests as if they are exclusive and different from European. </p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“Whoever gets this position – man or woman – will be a European commissioner, clearly with an Irish background, but not batting only for Ireland.” </p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Ms McGuinness also said Ireland’s reputation had suffered in Europe as a result of the controversy, but not “in the sense that we cannot recover”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“I think it’s very clear that when any member state is at the centre of a difficult crisis or controversy that lasts over a number of days it’s not good news for us and it’s an uncomfortable position,” she said. </p>

Koblenz: civil society groups demand ‘radical’ EU farm policy reform

0
Koblenz: civil society groups demand 'radical' EU farm policy reform

European civil society groups angered by decades of mass industrialized agriculture converged Sunday on Koblenz, where 12 EU farm and fisheries ministers began two days of informal talks hosted by Germany’s Agriculture Minister Julia Klöckner.

Police said 350 protesters, some on tractors and in animal costumes, headed towards the venue, a riverside palace, while a cross-European alliance, including bio farmers, environmentalists and slow-food advocates, put its turnout at 1,300 persons.

Koblenz lies at the junction of the (larger) Rhine and Moselle rivers in Germany’s state of Rhineland-Palatinate.

Read more: Europe’s hedgehogs endangered by farming practices

The alliance of 400 European civil society groups, calling itself in Germany “We are fed up with the Agra industry” (Wir haben Agraindustrie satt!) and “Good Food, Good Farming, Europe, urged ministers to make “radical” changes to the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

Better distribution of EU‘s farm budget urged

At €55 billion ($65 billion) a year — roughly a third of the bloc’s budget — CAP’s allocation of flat-rate subsidies for land areas farmed was clearly out-of-date and should be oriented instead toward the new European Commission’s Green Deal plan, said the alliance.

“The Green Deal sets the course that the post-CAP must follow,” it said, and ministers must “ensure” sustainable food sovereignty for future generations and rebuild ecosystems, soils and resilience in rural livelihoods.

Current EU policy of fetching cheap, unsustainable imports also degraded land in developing countries, said the alliance, echoing a German finding in June that Germany’s “footprint” through imported foodstuffs was three times heavier abroad than on its own soil. 

‘Immense’ responsibility

Germany, which currently holds the EU’s rotating presidency, had an “immense” responsibility to bring a CAP reform into line with climate and biodiversity goals, the alliance insisted, directing its remarks at German Minister Klöckner, who hails from Rhineland-Palatinate.

Klöckner, who has floated a European animal welfare label and an EU “farm-to-fork” campaign to reduce usage of herbicides, fertilizers and antibiotics, drew a caution Sunday from Joachim Rukwied. 

The farming federation president — for German growers,  and Europe‘s association Copa — said extra costs should not be imposed on farmers, who instead should get supplements to their incomes for environment protection and animal welfare tasks.

‘Massive’ concentration

The alliance of civil society groups said EU policy of recent decades of rewarding large landowners had “fueled” a massive concentration in farm and land ownership.

Across the EU, between 2005 and 2016, more than four million farms — often family-run livelihoods — had been forced to shut down due to economic pressures. 

“The remaining operations run increasingly large areas,” said the alliance.

ipj/sri (dpa, AFP)

Coming up: EU long-term budget, human rights | News | European Parliament

0
Coming up: EU long-term budget, human rights  | News | European Parliament

, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/eu-affairs/20200827STO85801/

The EU needs to fully designate Hezbollah as a terrorist group

0
The EU needs to fully designate Hezbollah as a terrorist group

The two explosions that tore through Beirut on Aug. 4 marked the latest catastrophe for Lebanon, a country beleaguered by a massive financial crisis and the coronavirus pandemic. The explosions killed at least 160 people, injured thousands and left many homeless. Lebanese officials blamed the disaster on a cache of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate, which had been kept improperly for years in a warehouse at the city’s port.

This chemical long has been favored by Hezbollah for attacks, though the Iranian proxy has denied stockpiling it at the port, which it controls. While it is currently unclear who owned the ammonium nitrate behind the explosions, Hezbollah has stored and used the same material abroad, including in Europe — all while evading a full terrorist designation by the European Union (EU).

In 2012, for instance, a bus carrying young Israeli tourists was bombed in Burgas, Bulgaria, killing six people and wounding dozens. Bulgarian, American and Israeli authorities all linked the attack to Hezbollah, and law enforcement determined that “ammonium nitrate was an active ingredient in the explosives,” according to a US Justice Department complaint.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Burgas bombing was not an isolated incident. Eighteen years prior, a suicide bomber drove a van packed with ammonium nitrate and fuel oil into a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, murdering 85 people and wounding hundreds. Argentine prosecutors have accused Hezbollah of carrying out the massacre under Iran’s direction.

Indeed, Iran has an extensive record of directing its Hezbollah proxy to conduct attacks on foreign soil. In the same year as the Burgas atrocity, Iran was accused of plotting against American, Israeli and Western targets in Azerbaijan; and orchestrating bombings against Israeli diplomats in India and Georgia. Plots were also uncovered in Thailand, Kenya and Cyprus, where a Hezbollah operative was arrested over his role in a bid to attack Israeli tourists. “I was just collecting information about the Jews,” the operative reportedly told police. “This is what my organization is doing, everywhere in the world.”

In 2013, the EU finally designated Hezbollah’s military wing as a terrorist organization. This paved the way for member states to freeze funds linked to Hezbollah’s military wing and for greater law enforcement cooperation. Yet the ban did not apply to the Iranian proxy’s political wing, effectively enabling it to continue operating in the EU and undermining the designation’s impact. Unfortunately, qualifying the terrorist designation between two wings is illogical, because all Hezbollah operations are coordinated and directed by its political elites. Indeed, even Hezbollah leadership has refuted and mocked this distinction.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah and its Iranian patrons have continued plotting terrorist attacks in Europe. In 2015, Hezbollah-linked operatives were caught stockpiling more than three tons of ammonium nitrate in the U.K., and 8.5 tons of the chemical in Cyprus. In 2018, France accused Iran of seeking to bomb an opposition group rally in Paris. In June, a Danish court sentenced a man over an Iranian plot to murder an Iranian opposition activist in Denmark. In July, reports emerged that Israel thwarted Iranian attacks on its diplomatic missions in Europe.

Hezbollah sustains its reach largely through Tehran’s support, which according to 2018 U.S. estimates amounts to $700 million annually. Yet it also maintains an independent fundraising apparatus, engaging in money laundering, drug trafficking, and other criminal operations across Europe, and exploiting businesses and charity front groups to funnel resources to its terrorist operations.

ADVERTISEMENT

This April, Germany unilaterally banned Hezbollah in full, reportedly after being tipped off about a stash of ammonium nitrate in the country’s south. Lithuania designated Hezbollah as a terrorist group this month. Such positions align with those adopted by the U.S., U.K., Canada, Israel, Argentina and the Arab League, among others. Yet most EU nations continue to rely on the bloc’s insufficient designation, which grants Hezbollah’s fundraising activities valuable breathing room.

As Europol, the EU’s law enforcement agency, noted in a recent report, investigations into Hezbollah “face the difficulty of demonstrating that the funds collected are channeled to the military wing of the organization.” Aligning Hezbollah’s terrorist designation with the reality of its operations would empower European law enforcement authorities to comprehensively target the group and its resources within the EU.

A full designation also would help further delegitimize Hezbollah at a time when the Lebanese government has resigned, and furious citizens demonstrate against the ruling elite. Indeed, it is notable that some of these protesters are directing their ire at Hezbollah, and even hanging Hezbollah leaders in effigy. The Lebanese are justifiably outraged over the governing malfeasance that set the conditions for this tragedy after running the Lebanese economy into the ground. But there is also evidence that they are fed up with Hezbollah’s parasitic exploitation of their country. Ramping up this terror group’s delegitimization is more urgent than ever to support a Lebanese movement to free their country from Iran and Hezbollah.

Deep reforms are needed if Lebanon has any hope of restoring governing normalcy. Unfortunately, Hezbollah, which exploits Lebanon’s weak political system to operate with no transparency or accountability, presents a major barrier to such reform and the hopes of the Lebanese people. By comprehensively blacklisting Tehran’s top proxy, the EU would decisively signal that Hezbollah is not a legitimate actor, directly threatens stability in and beyond Lebanon, and must be countered if Beirut is to have a hope of a true recovery.

Mark P. Fitzgerald, a retired U.S. Navy admiral, is a former commander of U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa and of Allied Joint Force Command, Naples. He is on the board of advisers for the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA).

Geoffrey S. Corn, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and former military attorney and intelligence officer, is the Vinson & Elkins Professor of Law at South Texas College of Law, Houston, and a distinguished fellow at JINSA’s Gemunder Center for Defense & Strategy.

Jordan signs 4 financing agreements with EU, Germany

0
Jordan signs 4 financing agreements with EU, Germany

AMMAN — Minister of Planning and International Cooperation Wissam Rabadi has signed four financing agreements in the water and education sectors in the presence of Sawsan Aruri, deputy director of the German Development Bank (KfW).

The first agreement is an additional European Union (EU) grant funding for a programme in the education sector amounting to 6 million euros, according to a Planning Ministry statement.

Three additional grant financing agreements for feasibility studies and a training component have also been signed in the water sector for  “Environmental and climate friendly sewage sludge disposal”, “Climate Protection Water Sector V” and “Energy Efficiency in the Water Sector II” amounting to a total of 2.2 million euros, the statement said.

The European Union will grant an additional 6 million euros for the implementation of an ongoing school construction programme in Jordan that was signed in 2018 with a total amount of 33 million euros. 

The objective of the school construction programme financed by the European Union is to assist the government of Jordan in responding to the needs of children and youth impacted by the Syrian crisis. 

This includes increased access to inclusive and child-friendly quality primary and secondary education for both, refugee and host community children. 

The EU-financed school construction programme, primarily channelled through the EU’s Regional Trust Fund in response to the Syrian Crisis, the Madad Fund, will be implemented in parallel to a bilateral school construction programme financed by the German government amounting to 34 million euros that was signed last month.

The German government has made funds available for feasibility studies for the preparation of new projects in the water sector. 

The first agreement is signed for a study of “Environmental and climate friendly sewage sludge disposal” amounting to 700,000 euros. 

The study aims to identify and elaborate concepts for the safe, environmentally sound and climate-friendly final disposal of sewage sludge originating from the wastewater treatment plants — mainly in northern Jordan — including domestic faecal sludge delivered by tankers, the statement said.

The second agreement that is also financed by the government of Germany shall finance a study for a project under “Climate Protection in the Water Sector V” and amounts to 795,000 euros. 

The envisaged project to be studied aims at mitigating climate change risks related to water in the Jordan Valley. 

In particular, the study shall analyse the potential for water loss reduction at the King Abdullah Canal (KAC) with the aim to identify and compare suitable alternatives to reduce the water losses in the KAC by means of a multicriteria analysis in the most sustainable and efficient manner. With support of the potential project a substantial amount of fresh water shall be saved for the use of drinking purposes, read the statement.

The third agreement financed by the German government through KfW German Development Bank amounts to 700,000 euros and shall complement the project “Energy Efficiency in the Water Sector II — with training measures to support operational staff in the water sector in the field of energy efficiency and sustainable operations.  

The school construction programme will be implemented by the Ministry of Education and Ministry of Public Works and Housing and is financed by the European Union.

The water sector programmes will be implemented by the Ministry of Water and Irrigation and is financed by the Federal Republic of Germany through KfW Development Bank. 

KfW finances investments and advisory services on behalf of the German government. In Jordan the ongoing and envisaged projects with a main focus on education, employment promotion as well as water and sanitation amount to about 1.3 billion euros, the statement said.

Since its establishment in December 2014, an increasing share of the EU’s non-humanitarian aid for Syrian refugees and their host countries is provided through the EU Regional Trust Fund in Response to the Syrian Crisis, the Madad Fund. With contributions and pledges from 22 EU member states and Turkey, the fund has reached a total volume of 1.5 billion euros to date.

Large programmes focusing on education, livelihoods, health, socio-economic support, water and wastewater infrastructure — benefitting both refugees and their host communities — have already been approved by the fund’s board, for a total of more than 1.4 billion euros. 

Of this, about 1 billion euros have been contracted in over 50 projects to the Trust Fund’s implementing partners on the ground, now reaching more than 2 million beneficiaries, concluded the statement.