14.7 C
Brussels
Thursday, October 31, 2024
Home Blog Page 1505

Saving Islam in France from political and ghettoised Islam

0
Saving Islam in France from political and ghettoised Islam
For purely electoral reasons, in the last municipal ballot, various parties of the right- wing, left-wing and even ecologists had radical Muslim candidates. For the imam of Nimes, vice-president of the French imams this is a danger for France and Europe: in the name of an impoverished local politics, political and combative Islam is valued, which does not seek coexistence, but to Islamize the continent, often with the help of Qatar and Turkey.
Paris (AsiaNews) – Several weeks after the municipal elections (15 March-28 June 2020) the question of Muslim “communitarianism[i]” still occupies minds.

The circumstantial electoral alliance between some republican political forces and representatives of a communitarian Islam that took place during these elections is increasingly disturbing.

By placing these self-styled protagonists, who consider themselves the only true representatives of the Muslims of France, in the forefront, our Republic is committing a grave mistake.

In this way, the Republic sells off its founding values, and risks retreating in the face of an aggressive political Islam which does not recognize itself in these values, and which has never wanted to abandon its socio-religious battle. This battle mixes issues such as unemployment and marginalization with religion, as well as all the delicate questions of the identity of French Muslims and their place in the national community.

The majority of these movements adopt an aggressive and confrontational strategy, and not a democratic and consensual one.

The main victims of these unnatural alliances risk being the indispensable and ineluctable reform movement of French Islam and the advance of the Enlightenment.

Between 2015 and 2019, in an immoral and illegal way, many French reformist imams were excluded from their posts as spiritual guides in certain mosques, from chaplaincies and from various charitable associations. The reason: their clear and strong condemnation of the Islamist terrorist attacks, their republican and humanist positions against hatred, separatism and radicalism.

For the republican imams, Muslim thought is reformable and evolutionary. The spiritual foundations of Islam are constant and immutable. But the Muslim elite must abandon the peremptory medieval fatwas, as well as undemocratic totalitarian methods, which impose conflicting and violent interpretations of Islamic religious texts.

The practice of a peaceful religious experience, more serene, human and above all compatible with modernity and contemporary humanistic values ​​needs a courageous adaptation of Islam with European values ​​and specificities. This will avoid an obligatory conflict, wanted and hoped for by Islamists who do not hide their intentions to Islamize Europe, without realizing that their suicidal strategy will lead to the end of Islam in Europe. European Muslims must in no way accept being held hostage in the hands of political Islam directed and financed by Qatar or Turkey. An independent and non-dominant European Islam may be able to adapt to local culture. Any foreign dependence means that Islam could become the cause of a serious and dangerous conflict that threatens social peace in a tolerant and welcoming continent, which for many decades has given so much to Islam and Muslims.

Unfortunately, republican Islam is set to enter a dark and more difficult period precisely because of that circumstantial Islamic-political alliance that emerged during the elections. Political Islam, strengthened by this opportunist alliance, will not fail to designate the republican Muslims and the leaders of these movements as the first victims, so as to bury any hope of adapting the Islam of France to the values ​​of the republic and to the social and cultural characteristics of our democratic societies, values ​​that have endured for centuries.

The humanist imams wept in communion with all the French people for the innocent souls who fell in the Islamist attacks of the Bataclan, of the Hyper Cacher, in Toulouse, in Brussels, in Nice. Now they risk being totally marginalized and disappearing, themselves victims of this storm.

The medium-term result of these alliances will tomorrow’s society increasingly move towards its radicalization, in which the majority of French Muslims, who reject this drift, will be increasingly isolated from the population.

This isolation, sown with hatred and violence, is the goal that the extremists hope for, the fertile ground in which to extend their project on their co-religionists. Stupidly, they dream in the short term of Islamizing French and Western society in its entirety, without realizing that this dominating and suicidal strategy, will mark the end of a peaceful and integrated Islam in France.

In his work “Territoires conquis de Islamisme [Territories conquered by Islamism]”, Bernard Rougier described what awaits us after these municipal elections, despite the efforts of ministers Castaner, Nunez and Belliubet to fight what, in his speech in Mulhouse, President Emmanuel Macron called “Islamist separatism”.

These municipal elections have made clear everywhere in France, the actions carried out by Islamists to seduce Muslim voters, thanks to the presence of Muslim candidates for some parties, who openly competed as Muslims. They are a part of the right-wing, of the ecologists and even of some of the republican right, all looking for voters who could ensure victory.

Instead of presenting themselves as citizens, French Muslims find themselves again taken hostage by conquering Islamism, which exploits the weakness of politicians, as well as the silence of the majority of Muslims, to present themselves as the only spokesmen for French citizens of Muslim confession.

At the local level, this entry of aggressive Islamism, hidden behind a façade of democratism, and through a pitying and intimidating communitarianism, can completely and irreversibly change the national political map and make it falter towards extremism.

In my opinion, the solution to this separatist drift can only be legalistic and republican.

Only a real, republican, voluntary emergency plan for the development, cultural integration, improvement in the daily and economic life of citizens who live in highly, often disadvantaged, Muslim neighbourhoods will be able to fight these “dream merchants” and limit the harmful influence of the various Islamist currents, which have proselytizing and separatist designs.

For those in power, the protagonists, the social workers, as well as for the imams linked to republican and human values, it is now time to take back these areas of ‘no-law’ in order to free them from the clutches of these extremist activists, to reintegrate them back into the place that is theirs: Within the national community.

(*) Imam of Nîmes – Vice-president of the Conference of Imams of France


[i] We thus translate the term “communautarisme”, which indicates a mentality that emphasizes the unity of a group and at the same time the separation from others in society, in a kind of self-ghettoization (ed).

Kickstarting economies without COVID-19 plan, ‘a recipe for disaster’: Tedros

0
Kickstarting economies without COVID-19 plan, ‘a recipe for disaster’: Tedros

“If countries are serious about opening, they must be serious about suppressing transmission and saving lives”, said WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, briefing reporters from Geneva.  “Opening up without having control, is a recipe for disaster.”

While this may seem an impossible balance, it can be done if countries are in control of transmission, he said.  The more control they have, the more they can open. 

The reality is that coronavirus spreads easily, he said.  It can be fatal for people of all ages and most people remain susceptible.

Prevention, prevention, prevention

To control transmission, he said it is essential to prevent events that lead to outbreaks. COVID-19 spreads efficiently among clusters of people, with explosive outbreaks linked to gatherings at places such as sports stadiums, nightclubs and places of worship. 

At the same time, there are ways to hold gatherings safely, Tedros said.  Decisions about how and when must be made with a risk-based approach, tailored to local conditions. 

Tedros said countries experiencing significant community transmission may need to postpone such events.  Those seeing sporadic cases or small clusters, on the other hand, can find creative ways to hold events while minimizing risk.

He advocated a focus on reducing deaths by protecting the elderly, people with underlying conditions and essential workers.  Countries that do this well may be able to cope with low levels of transmission as they open.

Individuals must play their part by staying at least one metre away from others, cleaning their hands regularly, practicing respiratory etiquette by wearing a mask and avoiding close-contact settings.

For governments, widespread stay-at-home orders can be avoided if they take temporary, geographically targeted interventions. It is important to find, isolate, test and care for COVID-19 cases – and both trace and quarantine contacts. 

WHO guidance for safe reopening

The UN health agency chief said WHO has a range of evidence-based guidance that can be applied in different transmission scenarios, most recently for hotels, cargo ships and fishing vessels.

Meanwhile, the agency is working with its partners through the ACT Accelerator and COVAX Global Vaccines Facility to ensure that a vaccine, once developed, is available equitably to all communities.  He thanked the European Commission, which announced today it would join the COVAX Facility, for its €400 million contribution.

Health systems under pressure

To be sure, all countries are under extreme pressure, he declared.  A WHO survey on the impact of COVID-19 on health systems in 105 countries found that 90 per cent of those surveyed have experienced disruption to their health services, with low- and middle-income countries reporting the greatest difficulties. 

Most nations reported that routine and elective services have been suspended, while critical care – such as cancer screenings and treatment, and HIV therapies – have seen high-risk interruptions in low-income countries.

While many countries are now implementing WHO-recommended strategies to mitigate service disruptions, only 14 per cent have reported the removal of user fees, which WHO recommends, offsetting potential financial difficulties for patients.

He said WHO is also developing the COVID-19 Health Services Learning Hub, a web-based platform that will allow countries to share their experiences.

Aftermath of Beirut explosion

Tedros also touched on WHO’s response to the 4 August blast in Beirut, which injured 6,500 people, left more than 300,000 homeless and severely damaged health infrastructure.

He said the agency is ensuring access to basic health and mental health care for the injured.  It is also expanding COVID-19 testing and treatments, buying medicines and protecting health workers.

To sustain these efforts, Tedros said WHO had launched a $76 million appeal. The WHO Foundation on Monday launched a campaign into which any individual or organization can contribute.

“This virus thrives when we are divided,” he said.  “When we are united, we can defeat it.”

UNHCR updated recommendations to the EU Financial Framework 2021-2027

0

World: UNHCR updated recommendations to the European Union Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 (August 2020)

The European Union (EU) is a key partner when it comes to addressing asylum and forced displacement challenges and assisting forcibly displaced people and their hosts abroad and at home. At the first Global Refugee Forum (2019), the EU strongly committed to further engage in forced displacement and asylum, as a reliable partner for protection and solutions.

With more than 79 million people forced to flee – 1% of the world’s population – continued, increased and predictable EU engagement on their behalf is needed now more than ever. UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, appeals to the EU to translate its commitment to a reliable partnership on forced displacement and asylum into sound instruments and sufficient resources in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF 2021-2027), both within and outside its borders.

In line with its founding Treaty and its Charter on Fundamental Rights, the EU needs to have adequate mechanisms in place as well as appropriate resources at hand to ensure people in need of international protection can access its territory, benefit from asylum in Europe, and contribute to societies through well-funded avenues for integration. Regarding its investments outside of the EU, with more predictable funding in place, the EU can meet growing humanitarian and development needs, save lives, help to ease pressure on large refugee-hosting countries, and provide forcibly displaced people with a future, wherever they are.

UNDP and the European Union enter the largest agreement to improve the economic and social wellbeing in Yemen

0
UNDP and the European Union enter the largest agreement to improve the economic and social wellbeing in Yemen

Yemen – The European Union (EU) and United Nations Development Programme in Yemen (UNDP) have signed a partnership agreement aimed at improving the economic and social wellbeing of Yemenis. With concentrated efforts toward the poorest and most vulnerable populations, the EURO 69.8 million (approximately USD 82.4 million) partnership will be the largest of its kind and will work to strengthen local authorities, bridge lifesaving humanitarian and longer-term development work, and engage the Yemeni private sector to fight poverty.

A three-year initiative, the Strengthening Institutional and Economic Resilience in Yemen (SIERY) intends to rebuild community trust in the Yemeni state and help redefine the central-to-local relations. SIERY will help scale-up support to the Yemeni formal local governance system to help maintain and ensure citizens’ have access to a wide range of basic services, that conflict is minimalized and social cohesion is fostered at the community-level, and that there is a sustainable economic recovery process in place for communities.

Fully aligned with the EU’s Global Strategy to build resilience by supporting good governance, strengthen humanitarian-development nexus and support private sector development, SIERY responds to crucial development challenges.

“In the sixth year of the devastating conflict in Yemen, the European Union continues to stand by the Yemenis, not only to face the most immediate challenges but also to build up their future,” said the Ambassador of the European Union to Yemen, Mr. Hans Grundberg. “This new initiative will put a particular emphasis on critical sectors for vulnerable populations such as health, water, food and education. It will also improve the livelihoods of people by creating jobs and learning opportunities. This will help strengthen the resilience of those already facing difficult situations to better face the multiple challenges linked to the conflict and the coronavirus pandemic.”

UNDP Yemen’s Resident Representative, Mr. Auke Lootsma, indicated that “The protracted conflict has created institutional and economic deficiencies in Yemen that have resulted in dire consequences for citizens. UNDP Yemen is delighted to work with the European Union to continue to improve the lives and situations of Yemenis to maintain, enhance and expand local governance systems.” He added that “Given the crucial role that small and medium sized businesses and Yemeni entrepreneurs play as the economic backbone of the country, SIERY will be instrumental in helping to forge new paths for inclusive and sustainable growth in the future.”

Implemented by UNDP and local partners, SIERY will help ensure basic service delivery such as rehabilitating vitally important community infrastructure like schools, water sanitation and hygiene facilities; address emerging needs such as conflict resolution; help avert disaster by training local authorities and community groups; assist with economic stability by creating plausible, local-level recovery plans; and working with internally displaced people.

UNDP has a longstanding partnership with the EU in Yemen that has impacted hundreds of thousands of Yemenis across the country. Our work together has focused upon enhancing financial security of Yemenis through income-generating activities; improved access to healthcare services; strengthened the ability of local authorities to deliver basic services; and assisted the most vulnerable with access to public services, solar energy and reliable income.

The SIERY project will begin in September 2020 across Yemen and will reflect the responsibility that a responsive and legitimate local governance has in rebuilding peace and stability, as well as cater to the immediate needs of local populations.

Caritas: Amid the virus, cultivate a “pandemic of love and solidarity” – Vatican News

0
Caritas: Amid the virus, cultivate a “pandemic of love and solidarity” - Vatican News

By Robin Gomes

As Christians around the world observe the annual World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation on September 1, Caritas Internationalis is joining Pope Francis in calling on all “to take bold steps in order to safeguard our common home, pray and act for building a community of solidarity and love.”

“As followers of Christ, we share a common role as stewards of God’s creation, our well-being is linked to the well-being of our mother earth,” said the humanitarian and development organisation of the Catholic Church in a statement on Monday. 

Building relationship with the earth

“It is also a moment of renewing our hearts and minds, and in rebuilding our relationship with Mother Earth, we are restoring our relationship with God,” said the global confederation of 165 national Catholic relief and development agencies.

Drawing attention to the ravages borne by the world because of the Covid-19 pandemic, Caritas said, “we became aware of our shared human nature and how interconnected the political, economic, social, spiritual and cultural dimensions are.”  

Covid-19 time to build solidarity

“We realised how unjust systems created the environment for the spread of diseases, how fragile our lives are, and how vulnerable we were before the virus.”  The pandemic also became an “opportunity for us to joins hands to defend lives and ensure that we do not fall victims of the virus”, Caritas said, stressing, “It is also an opportunity for a new form of solidarity to emerge.”

As the globalised world got viral, Caritas said it continued to spread what its president, Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle called the “pandemic of love and solidarity” around the globe.

Caritas said local communities that are victims of the failure to safeguard our common home are asking for “targeted and immediate action, especially concerning food security, access to water and ecosystem preservation.”

The worldwide charity federation thus called on all to protect and nurture life and ensure the sustainability of ecological, economic, social and political systems.  In the post-Covid-19 phase, it said, “the new, just and sustainable ways of living” must be promoted, by making people aware of the interconnected relationship between the respect for the earth and ecological, economic, social and political ways of living.

Season of Creation

With the Day of Creation on 1 September, Christians all over the world will begin the month-long Season of Creation.

Ecumenical Patriarch Dimitrios I was the first to proclaim September 1 as a day of prayer for creation for Orthodox Christians in 1989.  In fact, the Orthodox liturgical year begins on that day with a commemoration of how God created the world.

The World Council of Churches (WCC) was instrumental in extending the period from September 1 to October 4 as the Season of Creation. Christians worldwide have embraced this Season as part of their annual calendar.

Pope Francis, who in 2015 released his landmark encyclical, “Laudato Si’, on care of our common home”, that year led the Catholic Church in joining the ecumenical season. 

The Season of Creation ends on October 4, the Feast of St. Francis of Assisi, the patron saint of ecology, who is greatly loved by many Christian denominations.   The WCC has chosen “Jubilee for the Earth” as the theme of this year’s Season of Creation.  Dr. Louk Andrianos, WCC Consultant on the Care for Creation, Sustainability and Climate Justice explained the choice of the theme saying it is “to advocate for life sanctification and give rest to all Creation”.

Hong Kong Cardinal advocates for promoting a culture of life

0
Hong Kong Cardinal advocates for promoting a culture of life - Vatican News

Cardinal John Tong, the Apostolic Administrator of Hong Kong, has invited Christians to “revisit the notion of the culture of life”.

His invitation came in a message ahead of Pro-Life Day 2020,  which this year coincides with the 25th anniversary of the promulgation of Pope St. John Paul II’s 1995 encyclical, Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life).

In the past seven months, noted Cardinal Tong, “the pandemic (Covid-19) has claimed the lives of over 810,000 persons and infected more than 23.5 million persons worldwide. This disaster drives us to reflect on the values and meaning of life and treasure them more.”

The encyclical, The Gospel of Life, is “meant to be a precise and vigorous reaffirmation of the value of human life and its inviolability, and at the same time, a pressing appeal addressed to each and every person, in the name of God: respect, protect, love and serve life, every human life!” said Cardinal Tong, citing Evangelium Vitae.

Cardinal Tong also explained that the fourth Pro-Life Day was postponed to 8 September, the feast of the Nativity of our Lady, because its original day – the feast of the Visitation – fell on 31 May 2020, which was also Pentecost Sunday.

Covid-19 and the culture of death

Cardinal Tong noted that, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, some countries adopted some policies and attitudes that treated the pandemic lightly – like the common flu or by handling it with the approach of “herd immunity.” These attitudes, he said, “devalued our vulnerable brothers and sisters,” caused us to “neglect our responsibility to care for our brothers and sisters properly,” and intensified the impact of “the culture of death.”

Contrasting this with the encyclical Evangelium Vitae, Cardinal Tong said that St. John Paul II invited us to contemplate the meaning of life, its greatness and fantasy, respecting that everyone has a right to life. This reflection should, in turn, lead us to “do good…love and care for others,” as the value of a person is not determined by any categories but “simply because he/she is a person irrespective of any disability or incapability.”

He hailed the sacrifice of many priests who, in spite of infection rates, continued to visit coronavirus patients often at the risk of getting infected themselves. They live our Jesus’s words, he said, “no one has greater love than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends” (John 15: 13).

Promoting a new culture of life

To foster a new culture of life, the Cardinal stressed on the importance of obeying God’s commandment: “Thou shall not kill.” Obedience to this commandment, he further explained, includes not being angry with our brother, preaching the Gospel of life and supporting “all the programmes, organizations and teachings that promote the values of life and serve the gospel of life.”

In this regard, human life is to be respected and treated as “a gift from God, sacred and inviolable” from conception to the time of natural death. Consequently, abortion and euthanasia are “absolutely unacceptable” as the value of life is based on giving and accepting love with the understanding that “the conjugal acts of married couples are oriented to the procreation of life.”

Important also is “the formation of conscience,” noted the Cardinal, especially as “our societies and mass media today are deeply influenced by ‘the culture of death.’” He pointed out more education needs to be done to nourish a “correct conscience” in the face of a culture that causes “confusion between good and evil, precisely in relation to the fundamental right to life.”

The role of family

Cardinal Tong highlighted the important role of family as a “sanctuary of life” and the place “where the couple welcomes a new life – the gift of God.”

The family is also a “place for daily individual and family prayers, to live out the gospel of life and for the special care of the elderly and the sick.” In these capacities, he noted, the family has an “indispensable role in fostering the culture of life.”

Science, technology in service of human life

Cardinal Tong said that science and technology can be used in the “service of human life and its integrity,” insisting that advancements in biotechnology need to be understood in order to be used “for the promotion and protection of life.” 

In this regard, he acknowledged the role of the Bioethics Resource Center of the Holy Spirit Seminary College of Theology and Philosophy, the Diocesan Pastoral Commission for Marriage and Family, and Catholic schools which identify “life” as one of their core educational values. He also recommended the Creighton Model Fertility Care System for couples who are having difficulties in achieving pregnancies and natural family planning services for couples preparing to have children.

Pointing out that contemporary society is torn between a “culture of life” and a “culture of death”, Cardinal Tong called for critical thinking that is “capable of discerning true values and authentic needs” to build a culture of life.

In conclusion, he urged everyone to “love and respect every human life, walk forward patiently and courageously, to foster ‘the culture of life’ which is the fruit of truth and love.”

ESMA publishes list of thresholds for shareholder identification

0
ESMA publishes list of thresholds for shareholder identification
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities and markets regulator, has today published a document listing the thresholds above which shareholders can be identified in the various Member States of the European Union (EU).

The document contains information provided by national competent authorities setting out:

  • national thresholds for shareholder identification in Member States that have established such a threshold;
  • relevant national legislation and rules; and
  • indication of Member States where the revised Shareholder Rights Directive (SRDII) has not yet been transposed into national law.

ESMA drafted this document to enhance transparency around the regimes adopted across the EU.

The revised SRDII requires Member States to ensure that companies have the right to identify their shareholders. Member States may provide for companies having a registered office on their territory to be only allowed to request the identification of shareholders holding more than a certain percentage of shares or voting rights. Such a percentage shall not exceed 0,5 %.

Next steps

When ESMA receives notifications from Member States that information reflected in the document has changed, the document will be updated and republished on the website. However, there may be a small delay in making such updates. If any discrepancy is identified between the information in the document and legislation or rules published at national level, priority should therefore be given to the latter.

Historic Bristol Bay, Alaska salmon fishery dealing with latest challenge: COVID-19

0
Historic Bristol Bay, Alaska salmon fishery dealing with latest challenge: COVID-19

Northwest summers mean salmon on the grill. While Alaskans fill freezers with their own catch – our freezers are filled with enough salmon to last until next summer – those grilling elsewhere must buy either farm-raised salmon or wild sockeye salmon caught in Bristol Bay, Alaska.

Wild salmon return from the ocean to restart a life cycle that has persisted for millions of years. Wild Alaska sockeye (a favorite species of salmon) is caught over the course of a four- to six-week season, from mid-June through July, when the largest remaining wild salmon population returns to Bristol Bay.

These fish have been harvested by Alaska native peoples for thousands of years. Sockeye have been smoked, filleted, canned and frozen – and given, traded, sold and eaten – for generations.

But the fishermen, seafood processors and communities of Bristol Bay are under threat, and not for the first time. Bristol Bay carries painful memories of the 1918 Great Influenza, which devastated the local indigenous population. Now, the global economy has collapsed in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the market for seafood, often eaten at restaurants, has collapsed along with it.

In response to COVID-19, the state of Alaska imposed restrictions on the industry, including quarantines and social distancing mandates. Salmon processors have also imposed their own rules to keep workers restricted to company grounds.

All of this means the processors of Bristol Bay’s salmon catch face higher costs and lower retail prices. This has resulted in a dramatic 48% fall in prices paid to fishermen for their catch.

Fishermen, who must own or rent expensive permits to participate in harvesting, maintain boats and equipment and pay crew, face being forced out of the fishery.

An evolving business

In the late 19th century, commercial salmon fishing first drew fishermen to Bristol Bay from what Alaskans refer to as “Outside.” The fishing was first done via sailboat.

Seafood companies owned the boats, hired the crews and towed them to the fishing grounds, allowing the industry to restrict who fished and where. This control prevented overfishing and protected profits.

Seafood companies resisted modernization of the fleet until 1951, when the introduction of powerboats led to a new arrangement with fishermen, who at that point shifted to working more independently from the processing companies that handled cleaning, filleting and packaging the fish.

Fishermen have informal relationships with processors, to whom they deliver their product before knowing the price they’ll be paid. They receive bonus payments after the season based on market conditions and practices they can adopt that affect fish quality, including chilling fish as soon as they are caught, bleeding them and handling them carefully to protect the quality of the fish.

Disagreements about fishermen safety, unionization or cooperatives, and conflicts about prices have existed as long as the fishery. Fishermen, suspicious that processors were colluding to hold down prices, sued in the early 2000s. Though the lawsuit was settled, skepticism persisted.

Money for inside Alaska and Outside

Today, Alaskans make up about half the 2,500 fishermen who flock to catch sockeye in a Bristol Bay salmon run. Of the US$250 million of fish that was caught in 2018, fishermen who call the remote Bristol Bay area home took just under 20% of the money paid to fishermen, with the rest of the money going to other Alaskans or fishermen primarily from Washington, Oregon and California.

While fish are caught by a mix of Alaskans and fishermen from Outside, they are handled, cut and processed by a workforce that’s decidedly more geographically diverse, from places as far away as Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. Just a handful of processing jobs are performed by local residents.

Average total individual wages – around $8,000 for the season – for processing workers are higher than the median monthly household income in Bristol Bay but may also include room and board and other compensation in the self-sufficient canneries that spring up in Bristol Bay during the season.

Overall fishing activity provides millions of dollars in tax revenue annually to the Bristol Bay region, which has a total population of only a few thousand people.

Salmon troller fishing boats were used in the early 1900s.
Jean-Erick Pasquier/Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images

Emerging competition

Bristol Bay has always faced challenges based on the uncertain size of runs and external market competition. However, the structure of the market started to change significantly with the start of salmon aquaculture in Norway, with fish not caught by independent fishermen but raised by farmers in pens.

Through selective breeding and domestication, by the early 2000s, farmed salmon had grown to surpass wild salmon in volume of harvest, and today farmed salmon are grown at 2.5 times the rate wild salmon are caught. This has been a part of the shift in volume to farmed salmon in the market.

The volume of farmed salmon is not limited by nature, but rather by regulatory regimes and the ability of farmers to find fertile ocean. Conversely, Bristol Bay is not a factory, and wild production is influenced by myriad natural factors, including climate change. The fishery is managed for sustainability, and therefore cannot respond to a growth in demand for fish by increasing production.

The growing market share of farmed salmon has put pressure on Bristol Bay producers and fishermen, so the fishermen are now working together to protect the value and reputation of their product. Producers aim to maintain the catch’s value by marketing the fact that Bristol Bay sockeye are sustainably managed and not just organic but one of the last true wild food sources.

Recent years have been good for the fishery as it has seen record runs and harvests. At the same time, wholesale prices remained high for much of the last several seasons as processors shifted away from canning and toward higher-quality products like fillets. Fishermen have also captured more value from their catch through various quality bonuses for bleeding and better handling of their catch.

Yet the average size of fish caught has been trending downwards, forcing producers to adjust the types of products that can be produced. Larger fish are generally more valuable, as they can be turned into more, and higher-quality, fillets.

Is it worth it?

Fishing for Bristol Bay salmon has always been tough, not least because making your living on these cold northern waters is risky and sometimes deadly. The development of farmed salmon added to the challenge, but the wild industry was adapting, as fishermen tend to do.

And then the pandemic arrived.

This year, communities are trying to protect public health and their economies in the face of the coronavirus. Fishers traveling from outside the state must test and quarantine, and processors have implemented comprehensive testing for their workers traveling in from out of state. Fishermen and processing-plant workers have not been uniformly compliant with health mandates from state and local governments for social distancing and mask wearing.

[Get our best science, health and technology stories. Sign up for The Conversation’s science newsletter.]

As the run came to an end in mid-August, there have been 87 non-Alaska resident and 16 Alaska resident cases of COVID-19 in the Bristol Bay region. This is in the context of calls from some members of the community to shut down the fishery in response to COVID-19. It is unclear if these were detected because of more stringent controls by the industry, or the result of the fishery opening.

Fishermen wonder if the all the trouble is even worth their time. The reduction in demand has resulted in a dramatic fall in prices, making fishermen question whether they will break even.

And this happens at a time when farmed salmon is an ever-growing part of the industry. It is an open question what the long-run impact of this season will be, but in 2020 the average sockeye fillet on the grill in the lower 48 comes with a long history of conflict, cooperation and courage.

An International Viewpoint On The Willamette Valley Wines Of Oregon

0
An International Viewpoint On The Willamette Valley Wines Of Oregon
Vineyards in autumn in Willamette Valley Oregon under clouds
 Changing vineyard leaves in fall, Willamette Valley, Oregon

getty

Jarad Hadi was born in Clackamas, Oregon—southeast of the city of Portland. While growing up, his family spent time living in Paris, and he traveled throughout Europe and portions of the Middle East. His father introduced him to wine, which sparked a lifelong interest.

“When I turned 21, I decided that instead of buying it, I should try to make it. A neighbor had grape vines—I wouldn’t be able to tell you what sort—but I made my first wine in the basement from trial and error and reading books. I also had a job taking me to different countries, and was trying different wines.”

His life as a professional winemaker, however, was partially launched through poetry.

“A small publisher in Buenos Aires, Argentina, was going to publish a translation of my poetry book. Probably the most exciting point in my life.”

Recommended For You

Because Hadi was finishing studies and lacked funds, he needed money for his stay in South America. An Argentinian winery named Bodega Calle agreed to provide employment.

“That’s how I made my way down to this poetry book release—working for empanadas and a small stipend. It was great because they let me make wine on the side. That was important—I felt that hands-on learning was really big. You can work at a winery, but to understand the full picture, it’s interesting to make your own product. From that experience, my winemaking blossomed every year, every vintage.”

Back in the U.S., Hadi met Victoria Coleman of Lobo Wines of Napa Valley, California, as well as Michael Silacci of Opus One Winery. Both had had experiences in Bordeaux in France, and both encouraged Hadi to study there. He did so—graduating with a master degree in vineyard and winery management. He followed that with a stint of working with Chateau Pichon Longueville Comtesse in the Médoc region of Bordeaux.

Hadi then returned to North Plains, Oregon. He brought his new wife Giulia Schiavon—an Italian from Padova, located west of Venice (Giulia’s grandfather was a winemaker). He now manages a five-acre [2 hectare] parcel of his own vines (Grape Ink Wines) and produces 500 cases annually. He also consults for neighboring winemakers who own 45 acres [18 hectares] in northern Willamette Valley—including Mason Hill Vineyards, Eagles Nest Winery, Mason Ridge Farms, Lindas Vineyard and Highgrove Estate. When we recently spoke, Hadi explained the unique attractions of the region.

Vines in the Willamette Valley, Oregon

 

Jarad Hadi in vines in the Willamette Valley, Oregon

Grape Ink Wines

“Oregon and the Willamette Valley are in a cold climate region that can create wines of elegance: acid driven wines. But this also leaves you with creativity—there are still pioneering areas to look at within a region that has been established. We don’t have many families here beyond second generation wine growers.

“I found the Willamette one of few places that had attention for creating quality wines, but at the same time had space for new ideas. Although they found their voice producing great Pinot Noirs and more recently extraordinary Chardonnays rivaling those of Burgundy, the region is beginning to find its own identity after years of following Eurocentric tendencies. Producers are beginning to understand terroir not only as influence from soil, topography and climate but also their cultural interactions with the landscape. That’s led many to examine their own practices in vineyards and led the industry toward a sustainable revolution in adoption of organic, biodynamic and natural farming methods. The combination of these and other forces have been spicing up the diversity and quality of wines coming out of the valley. It’s exciting to dive into this together.

“Challenges here? You’re in the middle of nature. Mendoza, Argentina, was pretty barren. They planted most of their trees. Same in France—certain little areas are forests, and very controlled. Here—forests are everywhere. You wake up and there might be 50 elk in a pasture where you were going to plant a vineyard. The other day Giulia and I were trying to chase a deer out of a vineyard.

“Another challenge is climate. To make a quality wine you have to ride the line of being able to just ripen grapes each year. We have relatively dry summers, but if rains come at the wrong time, that’s difficult. You are always in this balancing act.

Vines in Tualatin Hills AVA, Oregon

 

Vines in Tualatin Hills AVA, Oregon

Grape Ink Wines

“Another challenge is carving out something in the market place. A lot of customers were used to wines from Napa Valley—rich and opulent. Those styles were initially pushed in Oregon: big business Pinot Noirs and Chardonnays. Now people are looking to create more authentic wines in a cold climate area—wines to age with acidity, and with brighter styles—more vibrant, mineral driven. We’re trying to introduce people to a different style of palate. I want to taste where it’s from, feel the wind in the bottle, taste the struggles, difficulty or successes. Or else wine becomes a science experiment, and less an expression of terroir. But that niche market is still only a sliver, for those ready to understand that sort of wine.”

Hadi told of lessons from Bordeaux and Mendoza that apply to the Willamette Valley.

“In Mendoza what was important was learning traditional, rustic styles of winemaking techniques. To work with different sorts of materials in the cellar—using different vessels for fermentation. That’s something we’re now implementing a lot in Willamette—not just traditional stainless-steel tanks, but also concrete, amphorae, large wooden vats—and finding what that does to wine.

“In France, one important thing was finding more of an intuitive style of winemaking. The most important aspect of winemaking is not only looking at the ongoing project and analyzing it, but also designing wine while in the vineyard–thinking about the forthcoming wine while you are picking grapes, while you are considering the harvest date. This approach is confident about what sort of wine you are going to make from the vineyard—instead of what sort you are going to make in the cellar. Completely European mentality. It helps extraordinarily. In California and Oregon people are asking me about numbers, science, juice panels, brix and malic acid. Those can be your backup plan to help understand the health of grapes, but they can’t be your decision maker. Your palate has to be your guiding tool.”

Hadi chose to settle in the northernmost region of the Willamette Valley to find a wide variety of expressions for Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and a few mountain varieties. It has allowed him to ‘push varietal expression’ by farming well, picking at optimal times and allowing wines to age.

En Plein Air from Grape Ink summer catalog

 

En Plein Air from Grape Ink summer catalog

Grape Ink Wine

“A huge focus of mine is to create wines that can last 100 years. Because, dinners in France at Academie des vins Ancienne in Paris—with bottles at least 50 to 100 years old—really sparked an interest in trying to create wines that could last forever.

“We’re looking at different varieties to experiment with for future climate change, and planting parcels strategically. One wine is Pinot Noir, Monduese from the Savoie [in France] and Trousseau from Jura. We’re looking at those outliers because they’re planted at high elevations in warmer areas. The blend is unique. Hasn’t been done here or anywhere else. Younger winemakers realize the Willamette Valley is a diverse landscape—not so singular that every site is going to produce world class Pinot Noir. That has to be removed from the vernacular because it’s not true; it’s too diverse of a landscape—different soil types and elevations and mode esprit, different winemakers who have different skill sets.”

Hadi also works with his wife Giulia to merge wine and art.

“She’s a painter and sculptor and I’m focused on wine. Trying to link it up was the idea of Grape Ink. I’ll create a wine, she’ll try it, and then create a painting. Or I’ll look at a painting and then try to create a wine based on what sort of emotions that paining brings out. This would be linked to textures of her paintings. A lot would be for summer releases because she paints bright and vibrant colors. The idea was to have that same sort of vibrancy come out through wines. Having characteristics that would bring out all three— white, rosé and red wines—and be able to evoke feelings of all three expressions—say Pinot Noir and Pinot Gris—in one bottle.”

Giulia Hadi of Grape Ink Wines

 

Giulia Hadi of Grape Ink Wines works on art imagery for wine labels

Grape Ink Wines

Hadi actively promotes the recently created Tualatin Hills American Viticultural Area (AVA) appellation in the northernmost region of the valley—abutting the Colombia gorge.

“A lot of people tell me just to focus on my property. But I think it’s important to focus on everyone around also and help them out—because we’re going to need to do this together. I don’t think one producer can change a region. But if we group together, we have a good chance to show what we think is special.”

What advice would he give winemakers interested in moving to the region?

“The Willamette Valley is still very collaborative, so expect good friendships. Unique to the area? We are not looking at everyone as competitors, but as collaborators. Important to people coming here—or to any region—is not to work off anecdotal knowledge, not just listen to what the neighbors tell you—but to pay attention to what you feel, what you know, what you can specialize in. And for anyone coming to a new region, it will be nice to see them bring something innovative and new.”

Jarad and Giulia will soon be parents—grounding their union and marrying their lives even closer to Willamette Valley. As their own parents and grandparents sparked their mutual interests in wine, no doubt they will one day do alike—but also adding lessons learned from working in a different hemisphere, as well as from living on other continents.

Grape Ink Rosé from the Willamette Valley, Oregon

 

Grape Ink Rosé from the Willamette Valley, Oregon

Grape Ink Wines

Buddhist Times News – China’s military made moves near disputed border

0
Buddhist Times News – China’s military made moves near disputed border

By  — Shyamal Sinha

On 5 August 2019, the Government of India revoked the special status, or limited autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state which consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of dispute among India, Pakistan, and China since 1947.

Local military commanders from the two countries were meeting along the disputed frontier on Monday to resolve the issues, India’s defense ministry said. It said India was committed to dialogue “but is also equally determined to protect its territorial integrity.”

The statement said China’s People’s Liberation Army on Saturday night “carried out provocative military movements to change the status quo” and “violated the previous consensus arrived at during military and diplomatic engagements” to settle the standoff in the cold-desert region.

In Beijing, foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said border forces were communicating over recent matters but gave no details.

“Chinese border troops always act in strict compliance with the Line of Actual Control, and have never crossed the line for any activities,” Zhao told reporters at a daily briefing.

India’s defense ministry issued its statement after a gap of a day and did not give details of the nature of the new incident.

The statement said Indian troops “undertook measures to strengthen our positions and thwart Chinese intentions to unilaterally change facts on ground.”

It said the activity took place on the southern bank of Pangong Lake, a glacial lake divided by the de facto frontier between the rivals and where the India-China face off began in early May on the lake’s northern flank.

Indian military experts said the latest incident occurred in Chushul sector, where the two sides were generally respecting each other’s positions.

“We never had any problem in this place and we hold it pretty strongly,” said Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda, who served as the Indian military’s northern commander. “After relative calm, China has suddenly opened a fresh, brand new front. It’s a huge provocation.”

India unilaterally declared Ladakh a federal territory and separated it from disputed Kashmir in August 2019, ending its semi-autonomous status and straining the already prickly relationship between New Delhi and Beijing. China was among the countries to strongly condemn the move, raising it at international forums including the U.N. Security Council.

According to some Indian and Chinese strategic experts, India’s move exacerbated existing tensions with China, leading to the deadly June border clash.

The disputed and undemarcated 3,500-kilometer (2,175-mile) border between India and China, referred to as the Line of Actual Control, stretches from the Ladakh region in the north to the Indian state of Sikkim. The two Asia giants fought a border war in 1962 that also spilled into Ladakh and ended in an uneasy truce. The two countries have been trying to settle their border dispute since the early 1990s, without success.

The ongoing standoff high in the Karakoram mountains is over disputed portions of a pristine landscape that boasts the world’s highest landing strip, a glacier that feeds one of the largest irrigation systems in the world, and a critical link to China’s massive “Belt and Road” infrastructure project.

The face off began at three places. Soldiers at Pangong Lake ignored repeated verbal warnings, triggering a yelling match, stone-throwing and even fistfights. By June it escalated and spread north in Depsang and Galwan Valley, where India has built an all-weather military road along the disputed frontier.

On June 15, the troops engaged in a nighttime clash in Galwan that was the deadliest conflict in 45 years between the nuclear-armed rivals.

According to Indian officials, Chinese troops atop a ridge at the mouth of the narrow valley threw stones, punched and pushed Indian soldiers down the ridge at around 4,500 meters (15,000 feet), leaving 20 Indians dead, including a colonel. China did not report any casualties.

Accusing each other of instigating the violence, both sides pledged to safeguard their territory but also to try to end the standoff that dramatically changed the India-China relationship.

Several rounds of military and diplomatic talks on ending the crisis have been unsuccessful.

In Ladakh, the Buddhist organizations celebrated the removal of Article 370 provisions and making the Ladakh region a separate Union Territory. The people in Leh and Matho celebrated 15 August as a day of “independence from Kashmir” and welcomed their Union Territory status.