Connectivity forms an important pillar of India’s Act East Policy, says Secy Riva Das
<p class="post-meta">
<span class="date"><i class="icon-calendar"/> Mar 19, 2021</span>
<span class="meta-user"><i class="icon-user"/> <a href="https://www.buddhisttimes.news/author/shyamal/" title="Posts by Shyamal Sinha" rel="author" rel="nofollow">Shyamal Sinha</a></span>
<span class="meta-cat"><i class="icon-book"/> <a href="https://www.buddhisttimes.news/category/breakingnews/" rel="category tag" rel="nofollow">BREAKING NEWS</a>, <a href="https://www.buddhisttimes.news/category/topnews/" rel="category tag" rel="nofollow">TOP NEWS</a></span>
<span class="meta-comment last-meta"><span>Comments Off<span class="screen-reader-text"> on Connectivity forms an important pillar of India’s Act East Policy, says Secy Riva Das</span></span></span>
</p>
<hr class="none"/>
<figure class="gmail-caas-figure" readability="8">
MEA Secretary (East) addressed a Webinar By — Shyamal Sinha
The ‘Act East Policy’, announced in November 2014, is the upgrade of the “Look East Policy” which was promulgated in 1992. It aims at promoting economic cooperation, cultural ties and develop a strategic relationship with countries in the Indo-Pacific region with a proactive and pragmatic approach and thereby improving the economic development of the North Eastern Region (NER) which is a gateway to the South-East Asia Region.
The policy has been continuously evolving since the early 1990s and involves intensive and continuous engagement with South-East Asian countries in the field of connectivity, trade, culture, defence and people-to-people-contact at bilateral, regional and multilateral levels.
Connectivity forms an important pillar of India’s Act East Policy and its doctrine of Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR), which form the building blocks for India’s Indo-Pacific Vision, said Riva Ganguly Das, Secretary (East), Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).
Secretary Das made the remarks while addressing the inaugural session of a webinar today on “Connectivity Cooperation for a Free, Open and Inclusive Indo-Pacific”.
“At home, India has taken several initiatives to improve physical and digital connectivity. Bharatmala Pariyojana is a new umbrella program for the highways sector that envisages building more than 80,000 kilometres of roads with an investment of around USD 107 billion,” Das said.
Noting the importance of Sagarmala projects, Riva said, “Sagarmala aims at Port Connectivity Enhancement, Port-linked Industrialization, Coastal Community Development and giving impetus to Coastal Shipping. Multi-Modal Logistics Parks shall act as hubs for freight movement enabling freight aggregation, distribution and multi-modal transportation.”
Secretary Das said India has devoted more resources and assigned greater priority to build connectivity in our immediate neighbourhood.
“Since 2005-06, India has extended Lines of Credit worth nearly USD 31 billion to more than 64 countries. Our Act East Policy is at the centre of our connectivity orientation and a fulcrum of our broader approach to the Indo-Pacific. Our efforts are focused on connecting our North-East with the dynamic economies of South East Asia, and enhancing connectivity within the North East itself,” Das said.
“On multilateral/regional front as a member of mechanisms such as the ASEAN, BIMSTEC, Mekong Ganga Cooperation, India is also undertaking various regional connectivity initiatives. We are currently discussing a Coastal Shipping Agreement and Motor Vehicle Agreement in the BIMSTEC format and also in the Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal (BBIN) group,” she added.
Talking about Prime Minister Modi’s IPOI initiative, Das said, “Our efforts to build connectivity can only succeed in synergistic partnership with other countries sharing the same purpose and objectives. And this synergistic partnership was the vision behind Prime Minister Modi’s announcement of the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI) in 2019 as an initiative for the countries in the region and beyond to collaborate for security and growth of the region.”
“Seeking the synergy between India’s “Act East” policy and Japan’s “Partnership for Quality Infrastructure”, the two countries have agreed to develop and strengthen reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructures that augment connectivity within India, and between India and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region.”
Das further informed that Japan has undertaken a number of connectivity initiatives in India.
“The Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail, the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC), the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, the Chennai-Bengaluru Industrial Corridor (CBIC) are all mega projects on the anvil. Japan is also partnering in various connectivity projects in Northeast India including the 20 kilometres long four-lane bridge between Dhubri in Assam and Phulbari in Meghalaya,” she said.
“Given Japan’s expertise in the development of quality infrastructure we believe that Japan’s lead on the Connectivity Pillar of IPOI will give a boost to connectivity in the Region and contribute to unlocking the potential for an equitable, positive and forward-looking change in the region contributing to Security and Growth of the Indo-Pacific.”
The first joint COVID-19 weekly surveillance bulletin was released on 19 March 2021 by WHO/Europe and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
For the first time both surveillance and vaccination data on COVID-19 in all WHO European Region countries and territories are accessible on one platform. The bulletin incorporates visualization of data on COVID-19 cases, deaths and vaccine uptake by age group, and hospitalizations.
The COVID-19 surveillance bulletin will be published on a weekly basis, presenting data reported by country for the week prior to each publication.
Catholic Church and EU Commission: “facing this historic period together”
Participating in the Spring Assembly of EU Bishops held online on 17-18 March 2021, European Commission Vice President Margaritis Schinas acknowledged the Church’s commitment to the promotion of the European project, and conveyed willingness to move the EU-Churches Article 17 TFEU dialoguetowards policy-based exchanges.
Bishops of EU Episcopates held their second online assembly since the beginning of the current pandemic in March 2020. In dialogue with Margaritis Schinas, Vice President of the European Commission, the Bishops exchanged on some of the most pressing topics on the EU agenda, highlighting the need to work together in facing this historic period marked by the ongoing Covid-19 and climate crisis.
Together, they discussed the current status of the recovery process in the EU and its Member States. In this context, the Assembly emphasized the importance of people-centred and value-based EU policies to protect the poor and the most vulnerable, especially in light of worsening socio-economic conditions deriving from the pandemic.
Vice President Schinas – who is also the Commissioner responsible for Article 17 TFEU – acknowledged the commitment of the Catholic Church to promote the European project and conveyed willingness to move the EU-Churches dialogue towards policy-based exchanges.
The participation of the EU Commissioner was also an occasion to exchange on the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, proposed in September 2020 by the European Commission. While recognizing the efforts to set out a new and comprehensive framework aimed to create a fair and predictable migration management mechanism, the EU Bishops urged all negotiating actors to promote a welcoming context as well as a fair and just approach to those in need.
“We have to workto ensure the full respect of the individual right to apply for asylum for anyone reaching the EU territory, without pushbacks at our borders,” the COMECE Assembly stated. Climate change and its ecological impact in third countries are also provoking large influx of migrants to the EU. The EU Green Deal– the Bishops stated – would be beneficial not only for the EU, but also for peoples in third countries who suffer the effects of climate change in their daily lives.”
During the Assembly, Bishops also analysed the current trends on Freedom of Religion across the EU, expressing their concerns for the rise of religious illiteracy, which can often lead to negative perceptions of religion.
In discussing recent restrictions to freedom of religion – e.g., Covid-19 measures, ritual slaughter of animals, religious symbols at the workplace – Bishops also underlined the importance of a dialogical approach to public authorities, while avoiding self-censorship and fostering interreligious initiatives to promote this Fundamental Right.
The dialogue with Commissioner Schinas was held in the framework of Article 17 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which establishes an “open, transparent and regular dialogue” between Churches and EU institutions.
Until Australia becomes a republic, our democracy still embraces archaic religious ideology with institutions that rely on taxpayers to survive, writes Max Wallace.
To explain this perspective, I argue here there are three dimensions to Australia’s Christian, monarchist, soft theocratic form of government: constitutional, symbolic and financial.
There are nine jurisdictions in Australia: Federal, two territories and six states. There are seven Constitutions: one Federal and six State. The British Queen, who is Supreme Governor of the Church of England, in England, is also Queen of Australia, so a religious figure symbolically sits atop the Commonwealth of Australia and atop the State jurisdictions.
The only section that mentions religion in the Federal Constitution is s.116. That section does not say there is a separation of church and state, or government and religion. Given that is so, it was up to the High Court to interpret s.116.
One could glean some subtle inferences that there is a separation from various cases, but there has never been an unequivocal statement to that effect. In fact, in Attorney-General (Vic) (ex Rel Black) v Commonwealth (Defence of Government Schools 1981 case), Sir Ronald Wilson said s.116 “cannot answer the description of a law which guarantees within Australia a separation of church and state”.
Sir Ninian Stephen said s.116 “cannot be viewed as the repository of some broad statement of the principle concerning church and state”. The Chief Justice, Sir Garfield Barwick, concurred.
Nothing has changed in the constitutional monarchy of New Zealand since then.
The point of s.116 could be said to merely deny the Commonwealth the ability to pass laws concerning religion, giving it a veneer of secularism. However, as we saw in the 1996 Andrews Bill concerning the Northern Territory’s Rights of the Terminally Ill Act, and the High Court Williams cases in 2012 and 2014, the Federal Government was able to do constitutional workarounds to quash the Territory law and fund religious-only chaplains in public schools. If there was a constitutional separation of government and religion in Australia, those manoeuvres, I suggest, would not be constitutional.
The Federal restriction on passing laws relating to religion does not apply to the states. There is no section in any State Constitution separating government and religion. The states still pass religious laws to do with churches’ trusts, incorporations and property matters and this has been the case since colonial times. The territories also pass this legislation.
There is a subculture of state legal bureaucracies corresponding with churches and other religious organisations, with specialist advice to governments on church legal matters, involved in this enterprise that goes sight unseen. This legislation is rarely, if ever, debated in parliaments or reported in the media except when a dispute over property between different branches of a church attracts attention.
A useful description of this legal phenomenon is the 2013 ‘Queensland Law Reform Commission Report, A Review of Religious and Certain Other Community Organisations’. This report, to review out-dated Acts, was chaired by a judge, four part-time Commission members including three QCs and one other lawyer. They had a supporting secretariat of seven. They recommended 14 Acts be repealed by the Queensland Government. These included Acts concerning All Saints Church, the Anglican Church, the Ann St Presbyterian Church, the Chinese Temple Society, the Queensland Congregational Union, the Roman Catholic Church and the Wesleyans. The Acts dated from 1830 until 1977.
As noted, much of this legislation concerns property matters. Colonial state governments simply gave parcels of lands to churches and legislated their rights to them.
On page 152 of the above Review, we read:
This was to erect a “temperance hall” that was built in 1869.
These land grants occurred in all states. They set up the churches to become the very wealthy organisations they are today. More recently, in 2008, the NSW Government gifted the Catholic Church an estimated $100 million for the church’s World Youth Day in Sydney. It could not be argued in a NSW court that this use of taxpayers’ money was unconstitutional. Furthermore, the Government would not answer questions in Parliament about the funding and stonewalled the Sydney Morning Herald’s FOI requests.
The Australian flag features the British Union Jack with the three crosses of Christian Saints George, Andrew and Patrick;
the state flags also have religious symbols;
Christian prayers are said before the commencement of business in all jurisdictions except the A.C.T.;
in the Senate, the President is compelled by Standing Order 50 to say a Protestant prayer;
the Great Hall of the federal parliament has been used for prayer breakfasts;
before the commencement of a newly elected government, there is a religious ceremony in a church where the prime minister and leader of the opposition read a lesson, usually a verse from the Bible;
knighthoods, awarded by the Queen upon recommendation, have their origin in a religious ritual;
in the High Court, when the full bench is sitting, the Usher declares “God save the Queen!” before the judges enter and sit;
each year, the Catholic Church sponsors a “Red Mass” where scores of lawyers file into a cathedral to receive God’s blessing for the legal year ahead;
important Christian days such as Christmas and Easter are celebrated as public holidays;
ANZAC Day is to all intents and purposes a religious event with the anthem God Save the Queen often played at the Dawn Service;
Australian postage stamps have Christian images on them every year; and
we carry the image of the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, the Queen, in the loose change in our pockets.
Out of all this symbolism, the only secular thing is the Australian national anthem, Advance Australia Fair. Even there, it has been reported that private religious schools have added their own religious verses, against protocol but without sanction from the Government.
Financial
Religious organisations are income tax-exempt as they are legally charities that ‘advance religion’. They also usually do not pay land tax, capital gains tax, stamp duty, payroll tax, local government rates and many other smaller taxes. Ministers of religion pay income tax, but they can claim very generous fringe benefits which can have the effect of lowering their due income tax.
In a review paper on these matters, Alec Spencer asks:
This question squares with my 2007 definition of a church in The Purple Economy: a church is ‘an on-shore tax haven, subsidised by taxpayers to pursue the supernatural’.
In the James Cook University Law Review, (Vol. 22, 2016, revised 2019, p.84), Alec Spencer neatly summarised the cost of financial assistance to religion to Australia:
There is so much politics unrelated to the relationships between government and religion that all of the above usually flies under the radar of political discourse in Australia, including in universities. It is, for the most part, sight unseen. Sure, churches have lost ground on issues like gay marriage, decriminalisation of abortion and voluntary euthanasia. But these social issues involve little taxpayers’ money.
To have any chance of changing our historical political-religious complex – our soft theocracy – Australia would have to become a republic with an amendment to the Constitution to separate government and religion. Only then would it be possible to argue, on grounds of separation of government and religion, that religious privileges of one kind or another are unconstitutional.
Until recently, that was the case in the Republic of the United States in respect of the big-ticket item of Federal funding of religious schools. In the 2019 case Espinoza v Montana Department of Revenue, the Trump appointees on the Supreme Court put a legal torpedo into the hitherto bipartisan support of the principle of separation of church and state, a principle on which the United States was partly founded. This demonstrates that even a republic is not safe from the churches who believe they have a right to impose their theocratic beliefs and they will do whatever it takes to get access to taxpayers’ money to promote them.
So, from a strictly secular perspective, Australia is not a secular democracy that favours neither religion nor atheism. It is a soft, Christian theocracy that has subsidised religion into the powerful position it has today where just five per cent or less of very religiously committed voters can frighten the more enlightened members of political parties into silence or sycophancy to continue their financial and other privileges.
Max Wallace, PhD was the tutor in sociology and also occasionally politics at the Centre for Continuing Education at ANU from 1983 to 2003. He is now secretary of the Rationalist Association of NSW.
The country has only one rabbi, Avi Feldman, who initiated the Chabad Lubavitch of Iceland in 2018. Feldman and the community members have worked hard to gain Iceland’s formal approval of their presence.
Iceland has finally recognized Judaism as a religion. The process took over a year and, despite being home to a small Jewish community, Iceland has never before acknowledged the religion. Recognition was finally awarded on March 8.
“For Iceland to formally recognize the world’s oldest religion is in itself very significant,” Feldman explained.
The decision is so significant because it allows Jews to pay taxes towards their own religious institutions. Jewish marriages, baby-naming, and funerals will also be accepted by the civil law.
While once Iceland was mostly isolated, immigration to the country has steadily increased. Some of these immigrant are Jews who escaped northward during and after the Holocaust. According to Jewish community member Julian Burgos, “After World War II Jews began coming here in small numbers, but it was always a small community.”
When Rabbi Feldman first arrived in Iceland, the Jewish community had merely 100 members. However, “We meet local Jews whom we didn’t know previously every single week,” he said. Since then, the rabbi has found at least 300.
While most of the Jews live in the country’s largest city, Reykjavík, the rabbi said he has discovered scattered populations in the smaller cities of Akureyri and West Fjord. There are even Jews living in some of the fishing villages in the country’s outskirts.
With the growth of the Jewish community, Feldman has fought to support its culture and community in Iceland. The country’s first Holocaust memorial service was held in January 2020. Soon after that, the community danced through the street with their first Torah scroll. A menorah was erected on Hanukkah in the city’s center.
This official approval of Judaism “Will help Jewish life here grow and become even more active,” Feldman exclaimed.
His wife, Mushky added, “The Jewish people of Iceland have waited a long time for this to happen. The determination of the people in the community to get this done is really impressive…There’s a bright future for Jews under the Northern Lights.”
The EU’s drugs regulator said on Thursday that it had found the AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine was “safe and effective” and was not linked to an increased risk of blood clots.
Around a dozen countries had suspended the use of the vaccine and were awaiting the outcome of an investigation by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) safety committee.
“The committee has come to a clear scientific conclusion: this is a safe and effective vaccine,” Emer Cooke, the head of the Amsterdam-based EMA, told a press conference.
“Its benefits in protecting people from Covid-19 with the associated risks of death and hospitalisation outweigh the possible risks,” she said.
“The committee also concluded that the vaccine is not associated with an increase in the overall risk of thromboembolic events or blood clots.”
Cooke added: “If it was me I would be vaccinated tomorrow.”
The EMA said however that it “could not rule out definitively” a connection to a particularly rare type of clotting disorder and would update the vaccine’s product information.
“During the investigation and review we began to see a small number of cases of rare and unusual but very serious clotting disorder and this then triggered a more focused review,” she said.
“Based on the evidence available, and after days of in depth analysis of lab results, clinical reports, autopsy reports and further information from the clinical trials, we still cannot rule out definitively a link between these cases and the vaccine.”
The new warning in the vaccine information would draw attention to the “possible rare conditions” to help patients and healthcare professionals “stop and mitigate any possible side effects.”
The EMA was launching a further probe into the rare cases, she added.
Iceland has finally recognized Judaism as a religion. The process took over a year and, despite being home to a small Jewish community, Iceland has never before acknowledged the religion. Recognition was finally awarded on March 8.
The country has only one rabbi, Avi Feldman, who initiated the Chabad Lubavitch of Iceland in 2018. Feldman and the community members have worked hard to gain Iceland’s formal approval of their presence.
“For Iceland to formally recognize the world’s oldest religion is in itself very significant,” Feldman explained.
The decision is so significant because it allows Jews to pay taxes towards their own religious institutions. Jewish marriages, baby-naming, and funerals will also be accepted by the civil law.
While once Iceland was mostly isolated, immigration to the country has steadily increased. Some of these immigrant are Jews who escaped northward during and after the Holocaust. According to Jewish community member Julian Burgos, “After World War II Jews began coming here in small numbers, but it was always a small community.”
When Rabbi Feldman first arrived in Iceland, the Jewish community had merely 100 members. However, “We meet local Jews whom we didn’t know previously every single week,” he said. Since then, the rabbi has found at least 300.
While most of the Jews live in the country’s largest city, Reykjavík, the rabbi said he has discovered scattered populations in the smaller cities of Akureyri and West Fjord. There are even Jews living in some of the fishing villages in the country’s outskirts.
With the growth of the Jewish community, Feldman has fought to support its culture and community in Iceland. The country’s first Holocaust memorial service was held in January 2020. Soon after that, the community danced through the street with their first Torah scroll. A menorah was erected on Hanukkah in the city’s center.
This official approval of Judaism “Will help Jewish life here grow and become even more active,” Feldman exclaimed.
His wife, Mushky added, “The Jewish people of Iceland have waited a long time for this to happen. The determination of the people in the community to get this done is really impressive…There’s a bright future for Jews under the Northern Lights.”