Facial recognition and other high-risk artificial intelligence applications will face strict constraints under new rules unveiled by the European Union that threaten hefty fines for companies that don’t comply.
The European Commission, the bloc’s executive body, proposed measures on Wednesday that would ban certain AI applications in the EU, including those that exploit vulnerable groups, deploy subliminal techniques or score people’s social behavior.
The use of facial recognition and other real-time remote biometric identification systems by law enforcement would also be prohibited, unless used to prevent a terror attack, find missing children or tackle other public security emergencies.
Facial recognition is a particularly controversial form of AI. Civil liberties groups warn of the dangers of discrimination or mistaken identities when law enforcement uses the technology, which sometimes misidentifies women and people with darker skin tones.
Digital rights group EDRI has warned against loopholes for public security exceptions use of the technology.
Other high-risk applications that could endanger people’s safety or legal status—such as self-driving cars, employment or asylum decisions — would have to undergo checks of their systems before deployment and face other strict obligations.
The measures are the latest attempt by the bloc to leverage the power of its vast, developed market to set global standards that companies around the world are forced to follow, much like with its General Data Protection Regulation.
The U. S. and China are home to the biggest commercial AI companies — Google and Microsoft Corp., Beijing-based Baidu, and Shenzhen-based Tencent — but if they want to sell to Europe’s consumers or businesses, they may be forced to overhaul operations.
Key Points:
Fines of 6% of revenue are foreseen for companies that don’t comply with bans or data requirements
Smaller fines are foreseen for companies that don’t comply with other requirements spelled out in the new rules
Legislation applies both to developers and users of high-risk AI systems
Providers of risky AI must subject it to a conformity assessment before deployment
Other obligations for high-risk AI includes use of high quality datasets, ensuring traceability of results, and human oversight to minimize risk
The criteria for ‘high-risk’ applications includes intended purpose, the number of potentially affected people, and the irreversibility of harm
AI applications with minimal risk such as AI-enabled video games or spam filters are not subject to the new rules
National market surveillance authorities will enforce the new rules
EU to establish European board of regulators to ensure harmonized enforcement of regulation across Europe
Rules would still need approval by the European Parliament and the bloc’s member states before becoming law, a process that can take years
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
The European Union’s executive branch on … public places.
The draft EU regulations include rules for other … the U.S. and China. EU Commissioner for Internal Market Thierry … be enacted with EU member governments and the European Parliament before coming into …
Today, the European Commission proposed new rules and actions as part of an effort to turn the European Union into a global hub for Artificial Intelligence (AI).
The “first-ever” legal framework is designed to ensure trust and safety while fostering AI innovation.
In a speech by EC Executive Vice President Margarethe Vestager, five obligations were outlined for AI in Europe:
AI providers are required to feed their systems with high-quality data to make sure the results don’t come out biased or discriminating;
They also need to give detailed documentation about how their AI systems work, for authorities to assess their compliance;
Providers must share substantial information with users to help them understand and properly use AI systems;
they have to ensure an appropriate level of human oversight both in the design and implementation of Artificial Intelligence;
and finally, they must respect the highest standards of cybersecurity and accuracy.
Vestager said that their strategy for Europe’s digital future, is to create, “an ecosystem of trust goes together with an ecosystem of excellence.”
“For Europe to become a global leader in trustworthy AI, we need to give businesses access to the best conditions to build advanced AI systems,” said Vestager. ” This is the idea behind our revised coordinated plan on Artificial Intelligence. It coordinates the investments across Member States to ensure that money from Digital Europe and Horizon Europe programs is spent where we need it the most. For instance in high-performance computing or to create facilities to test and improve AI systems.”
In a statement by the Commission, high-risk AI systems were outlined:
Critical infrastructures (e.g. transport), that could put the life and health of citizens at risk;
Educational or vocational training, that may determine the access to education and professional course of someone’s life (e.g. scoring of exams);
Safety components of products (e.g. AI application in robot-assisted surgery);
Employment, workers management and access to self-employment (e.g. CV-sorting software for recruitment procedures);
Essential private and public services (e.g. credit scoring denying citizens opportunity to obtain a loan);
Law enforcement that may interfere with people’s fundamental rights (e.g. evaluation of the reliability of evidence);
Migration, asylum and border control management (e.g. verification of authenticity of travel documents);
Administration of justice and democratic processes (e.g. applying the law to a concrete set of facts).
High-risk AI systems will be subject to strict obligations before they can be put on the market:
Adequate risk assessment and mitigation systems;
High quality of the datasets feeding the system to minimise risks and discriminatory outcomes;
Logging of activity to ensure traceability of results;
Detailed documentation providing all information necessary on the system and its purpose for authorities to assess its compliance;
Clear and adequate information to the user;
Appropriate human oversight measures to minimise risk;
High level of robustness, security and accuracy.
Overall, the goal is to create “enabling conditions for AI to grow and develop. Next steps in the policy initiative include having European Parliament and the Member States adopting the Commission’s proposals on the approach for AI, as well as Machinery Products, in the legislative procedure. Once adopted, the Regulations will be directly applicable across the EU.
Of course, AI is already fairly prolific within various industries – financial services being a key benefactor from the technology.
The EU plans to dedicate €1 billion per year in AI while attracting over €20 billion in overall investment in AI – each year.
Only time will tell if this structured approach will drive greater innovation and adoption or if a more laissez-faire policy may be superior.
For more sustainability on a global level, EU legislation should be changed to allow the use of gene editing in organic farming. This is what an international research team involving the Universities of Bayreuth and Göttingen demands in a paper published in the journal Trends in Plant Science.
In May 2020, the EU Commission presented its ‘Farm-to-Fork’ strategy, which is part of the European Green Deal. The aim is to make European agriculture and its food system more sustainable. In particular, the proportion of organic farming in the EU’s total agricultural land is to be increased to 25 percent by 2030. However, if current EU legislation remains in place, this increase will by no means guarantee more sustainability, as the current study by scientists from Bayreuth, Göttingen, Düsseldorf, Heidelberg, Wageningen, Alnarp, and Berkeley shows.
Numerous applications derived from new biotechnological processes are severely restricted or even banned by current EU law. This is especially true for gene editing, a new precision tool used in plant breeding. “Expanding organic farming further under the current legal restrictions on biotechnology could easily lead to less sustainability instead of more. Yet gene editing in particular offers great potential for sustainable agriculture,” says Kai Purnhagen, lead author of the study and Professor of German & European Food Law at the University of Bayreuth.
Organic farming focuses on greater farming diversity and prohibits the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Therefore, it can have a beneficial effect on environmental protection and biodiversity at the local level. However, compared to conventional farming, organic farming also delivers lower yields. Consequently, more land is needed to produce the same amount of high-quality food. “As global demand for high-quality food increases, more organic farming in the EU would lead to an expansion of agricultural land elsewhere in the world. This could easily result in environmental costs that exceed any local environmental benefits in the EU, as the conversion of natural land into agricultural land is one of the biggest drivers of global climate change and biodiversity loss,” says co-author Matin Qaim, Professor of Agricultural Economics at the University of Göttingen.
The combination of organic farming and modern biotechnology could be a way to resolve this dilemma. “Gene editing offers unique opportunities to make food production more sustainable and to further improve the quality, but also the safety, of food. With the help of these new molecular tools, more robust plants can be developed that deliver high yields for high-quality nutrition, even with less fertilizer,” says co-author Stephan Clemens, Professor of Plant Physiology at the University of Bayreuth and founding Dean of the new Faculty of Life Sciences: Food, Nutrition & Health on the Kulmbach campus. In addition, gene editing is used to breed fungus-resistant plants that thrive under organic farming without copper-containing pesticides. Copper is particularly toxic to soil and aquatic organisms, but its use to control fungi is nevertheless permitted in organic farming because of the lack of non-chemical alternatives to date. “Organic farming and gene editing could therefore complement each other very well and, combined, could contribute to more local and global sustainability,” says Qaim.
However, the use of genetic engineering in organic farming requires legal changes at the EU level. “There is certainly no political majority for this at present, because genetic engineering is viewed very critically by many. Yet perhaps improved communication could gradually lead to greater societal openness, at least towards gene editing, because this form of genetic engineering enables very targeted breeding without having to introduce foreign genes into the plants. Highlighting this point could dispel many of the widespread fears of genetic engineering,” says Purnhagen.
</p><hr/>
<div class="article-main__explore my-4 d-print-none">
<div class="d-flex align-items-center">
<svg>
<use href="https://phys.b-cdn.net/tmpl/v6/img/svg/sprite.svg#plus" x="0" y="0"/>
</svg>
<p class="text-bold mb-0 ml-2">Explore further
</div>
<a class="text-medium text-info mt-2 d-inline-block" href="https://phys.org/news/2020-04-agricultural-economist-results-food.html" rel="nofollow">Agricultural economist evaluates research results on food security</a>
</div>
<hr class="mb-4"/>
<div class="article-main__more p-4" readability="27.028776978417">
<strong>More information:</strong>
Kai P. Purnhagen et al. Europe's Farm to Fork Strategy and Its Commitment to Biotechnology and Organic Farming: Conflicting or Complementary Goals?, <i>Trends in Plant Science</i> (2021). <a data-doi="1" href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.012" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.012</a>
</div>
<div class="d-inline-block text-medium my-4">
Provided by
<a href="https://phys.org/partners/university-of-bayreuth/" rel="nofollow">University of Bayreuth</a>
<a class="icon_open" href="https://www.uni-bayreuth.de/en/index.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">
<svg>
<use href="https://phys.b-cdn.net/tmpl/v6/img/svg/sprite.svg#icon_open" x="0" y="0"/>
</svg>
</a>
</div>
<!-- print only -->
<div class="d-none d-print-block" readability="15">
<strong>Citation</strong>:
International research team argues for combination of organic farming and genetic engineering (2021, April 21)
retrieved 21 April 2021
from https://phys.org/news/2021-04-international-team-combination-farming-genetic.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
</div>
IRVING, Texas, April 21, 2021 /Standard Newswire/ — The mission of Word on Fire is to utilize the tools of new media to proclaim Christ in the culture and draw people into—or back to—the Catholic faith. A Reddit “Ask Me Anything” (AMA) thread—a real-time, crowdsourced question-and-answer session—is a perfect opportunity to do precisely that. Bishop Robert Barron will be hosting his third AMA on the site, taking place Wednesday (4/21) at 2:00 p.m. ET (1:00 p.m. CT / 11:00 a.m. PT).
Reddit is an enormously popular and influential cultural platform that has drawn in celebrities, bestselling authors, and even American Presidents for AMAs. But more importantly, Reddit’s audience also tends to be young, intellectually curious, and largely nonreligious. This is a great opportunity to introduce countless “nones” to Christ and his Church.
In 2018, Bishop Barron became the first Catholic bishop to ever host a Reddit AMA. With over 11,000 comments, it became the third-most-commented-on Reddit AMA of 2018 (behind only Jordan Peterson and Bill Gates). In 2019, he returned for a second AMA, and this one was even more popular. It attracted nearly 15,000 comments and, once again, was the third-most-commented-on Reddit AMA of 2019 (behind only Beto O’Rourke and Bill Gates).
To support this third discussion, users can “upvote” Bishop Barron’s AMA and their favorite questions and answers. Further, they can share a link to the AMA with friends and family to let them know about this evangelistic opportunity. For more details, visit wordonfire.org/reddit.
Word on Fire Catholic Ministries (wordonfire.org) exists to support the evangelization efforts of Bishop Robert Barron by drawing people into the Body of Christ, which is the Church, and thereby giving them access to all the gifts that Jesus wants his people to enjoy. To be most effective in this mission, Word on Fire places an emphasis and urgency on the use of contemporary forms of media and innovative communication technologies.
SOURCE Word on Fire Catholic Ministries
CONTACT: William Sipling, Communications Director, 866-928-1237, [email protected]
Support for the Eastern Partnership states is a key pillar for the European Council, President of the European Council Charles Michel said, Trend reports citing the press office of the European Council.
Michel made the statement after his meeting with President of Georgia Salome Zourabichvili in Tbilisi, Georgia.
Eastern Partnership (EaP) is a joint policy initiative which aims to deepen and strengthen relations between the European Union (EU), its Member States and its six Eastern neighbors: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and Armenia.