The European Union has expressed deep apprehension regarding a draft bill currently under discussion in the Israeli parliament that threatens the operations of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). This legislation, if passed, could have catastrophic implications for Palestine refugees in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza.
In a statement, the EU underscored its support for the UN Secretary General’s call to address the situation, emphasizing that the draft bill would prevent UNRWA from continuing its vital services. “The final adoption of the bill would abrogate the 1967 agreement between Israel and UNRWA, stopping all operations in Israel and East Jerusalem,” a high-ranking EU official stated. “This would destroy UNRWA’s life-saving operations in Gaza and seriously hamper the provision of health, education, and social services in the West Bank.”
The EU has urged Israeli authorities to allow UNRWA to carry out its crucial work in accordance with its mandate adopted by the UN General Assembly. “UNRWA provides essential services to millions of people across the region, including Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan, and is a pillar of regional stability,” the official added. “It plays a fundamental role in ensuring the conditions on the ground for a credible pathway towards the Two-State solution.”
The potential legislation would not only halt UNRWA’s operations but also revoke its diplomatic privileges and immunities, significantly undermining its effectiveness. The EU reiterated its commitment to supporting UNRWA and closely monitoring the implementation of recommendations from the Independent Review Group report. “We are committed to ensuring neutrality, accountability, and strengthening control and oversight over the operations of the Agency,” the EU representative affirmed.
As the situation unfolds, the EU remains a firm supporter of the United Nations and the multilateral, rules-based global governance system, recognizing UNRWA’s critical role in providing humanitarian assistance and fostering stability in a volatile region. The implications of this draft bill extend beyond immediate humanitarian concerns, potentially jeopardizing the fragile peace process and the future of countless refugees reliant on UNRWA’s services.
URI is known as the largest international grassroots interfaith cooperation organization in the world. It brings people of all faiths together in more than 100 countries on all continents. We had the opportunity to interview Eric Roux, its newly elected Chair.
In a world like ours, where conflicts are increasingly covering the face of the earth, and where religions have failed to prevent it, if not contributed to it, why would interfaith matter?
I wouldn’t say that “religions failed” more than “governments failed” or “the UN failed”, “the OSCE failed”, etc. In fact, if you want to put the blame on someone, you should say that we, as humanity, have failed until now to prevent wars and conflicts. None of us can exclude ourselves from the responsibility of our world. But blame does not solve anything. Many people think of interfaith as an activity where some people from two or three mainstream religions meet and come out with a wishy-washy statement calling for world peace. That’s not what it is.
We, at URI, do interfaith cooperation. That means that we bring people together, from different faiths, the more inclusive the better, and we make sure that we work together toward a specific purpose. So let’s say that your interfaith cooperation group is working on environmental issues. Their primary focus will be to be efficient in that field. But one immediate side effect will be that they will have to share the space with their fellows from other religions, to share the same reality of their mission, and to communicate together to accomplish their goals. The result will be that they will understand each other, will become friends, and that itself contribute to a more peaceful world. Of course, it’s all about the scope and size of these activities. It requires a lot, a huge lot of cooperation to have a noticeable effect at global level.
So, how does it work, concretely?
In URI, it’s the grassroots which leads the effort. We have more than 1,200 groups on the ground, all over the world, which we call “cooperation circles”. They are composed of people of different religions or spiritual traditions, who have decided to work together to create a positive impact in specific fields. Some are engaged in the restoration of the environment and the preservation of the Earth from the consequences of the climate change. Some will focus on the prevention of religiously motivated violence and organize healing sessions between communities at odd to create communication between them. Some are focusing on artistic performances that bring together people who otherwise would never learn from each other. Some are working against the proliferation of nuclear weapons, along with the UN. Others will dedicate themselves to protect the rights of indigenous communities when their spiritual traditions are endangered by bigotry and vested interests. As well as dozens of other topics or sub-topics. But at the end of the day they all contribute to the purpose of URI, which is to promote enduring, daily interfaith cooperation, to end religiously motivated violence and to create cultures of peace, justice, and healing for the Earth and all living beings.
At a lunch organized by the Sikh community, Parliament of the World Religions 2023
And how would you describe the difference between URI and other interfaith organizations?
It’s the grassroots component which really makes the difference. Several big interfaith organizations put the stress on religious leaders, mainly from the big religious organizations. While bringing aboard religious leaders is important, we believe that to really create a broad impact, you need to give a chance to everyone to contribute. And you can be surprised by some people of faith or not who don’t hold any title, and are not religious leaders, and can in fact be leaders in their community when it comes to advancing the good. It’s not that we criticize other international interfaith organizations, as we are partners and they do a great and crucial job, but ours is a vital complement to it. Both is necessary: religious leaders, and individuals who want to dedicate their life, or part of their life, to bring about a better world where people of all faiths or none can live together in harmony. I am not saying we are the only ones to do that, but that’s what makes us special, as an large international organization.
In fact, the board of trustees in URI is made of people who are grassroots interfaith activists, from all regions of the globe. They are elected by the cooperation circles themselves, among themselves. It’s not top-down, it’s bottom-up, and finally circling in a virtuous way. Those who know the difficulties on the ground are those who will help URI defining its strategy to overcome the challenges. They are helped and supported by a staff made of people who are super-dedicated to interfaith and to the purpose of URI. Being a staff in URI, whether you are the Executive Director, a Senior Director, a regional coordinator or any other post, is not a normal job. It’s a mission, a peace-making mission which is led by people who are heart and soul for fostering understanding and collaboration between people of all faiths and spiritual traditions.
Sorry to ask a provocative question, but do you really believe that an organization like URI is able to bring peace on Earth, end religiously motivated violence and bring justice to all living beings?
You know, the bad behaviors behind wars and violence are contagious. But so are positive behaviors. Most of the people are interested in living their life in harmony with others. Very few are those who really love war. When they see examples of good behaviors between people who have different backgrounds, they find hope again.
Few days ago, I received a message from one of our cooperation circles in Sri Lanka, as they had started a project to restore the mangrove ecosystems in a lagoon in Puttalam District. That may sound minor, but it’s not. First of all, when they do that, they bring together members of the surrounding villages who come to participate to the action, and all of them mingle with people who don’t have the same faith than them, sharing a joyful experience of doing something positive for their society. That’s much more powerful than bad behavior, as that will stay in their soul as a sunny truth. Those people will be much more difficult to convert to violence, as they have tasted the good of living together in peace and cooperating toward positive goals. That will not stop the war in the Middle East, you can tell me. Well, I guess not, unless you believe in the butterfly effect. But let’s say that around the lagoon, only 1,000 people noticed it. Their lives are changed by it. You multiply this by 1,200 (the number of cooperation circles) and 365 days in a year, and you start having quite a better number of people touched by positive interfaith cooperation. But even if it was just that 1,000 people in Sri Lanka, it would be worth it. Not to mention the positive effect on the mangrove, which will enable future generations to survive better.
URI volunteers in the mangrove, Sri Lanka
I’m not saying it’s enough. We are very aware of the need to grow and increase the cooperation, everywhere, anytime, if we want to have a chance to counterbalance the chaos created by a few. But we know by experience that this is the way: bringing people together and have them work toward a common positive goal, where all have a chance to help, contribute, and create.
I would add this little thing: yes, the world is not doing well, and yes there are wars and conflicts, religious persecutions, injustice, bigotry, hate speech, terrorism as well as a tremendous environmental challenge nowadays. Nevertheless, we should never forget that beautiful things exist too, and that many things in the world are doing well. A lot of people are working for the good, a lot of initiatives are bringing about a better world, most of the people like each other, miracles of life happen every day, and that is the most important thing in humanity, as well as in the creation as a whole. We, the people, know how to do magic. It’s just a matter of doing more in favor of a better world, and not accepting anymore the bad things as a fatality.
So yes, we believe we can do something, and we also believe we can fulfill our mission to a complete success. Are we dreamers? Certainly, but who says a dream can’t come true?
I hope so. Honestly, in URI, the role of the Chair is to serve. The former Chair, Preeta Bansal, was fantastic and brought URI to new heights in terms of setting its innovative organizational form and bringing a renewed grassroots vision. And behind URI, you have the vision of a giant, its founder Bishop Bill Swing, who dreamed it and made it a reality, bringing the vision of a few to a movement that touches millions in only two decades. So I just see myself as a servant of the 1,200 cooperation circles that do the job every day, of my fellow trustees who have a long experience of serving their communities, and a partner of the Executive Director Jerry White, and the staff who dedicate their time to help cooperation circles to grow and act. I love URI, I love the people in it, I love the people in general, and I believe that it has the true potential of bringing about a better world. So why should I save my energy on it?
It is regrettable that Blast, under the guise of an alleged journalistic investigation by journalist Philippe Engel, has chosen to spread false and defamatory allegations against me and my organization, Bruxelles Média. I wish to set the record straight and expose the true motives behind these attacks.
1. Almouwatin asbl no longer exists: an obvious manipulation
Firstly, it’s essential to point out that Almouwatin was closed for good in 2019, and that Bruxelles Média was founded under a completely new framework. The fact that Blast chooses to mix the two entities demonstrates a blatant lack of professionalism and a deliberate desire to sow confusion. Our offices are located at the Cité des Associations in Brussels, we are in full compliance with our legal obligations, and recognized by the Belgian CSA (Supreme Council of Audiovisual).
2. A transparent and constructive collaboration
Our relationship with Eddy Van Ryne is that of a friendly, professional collaboration. Blast tries to portray our work as suspect, whereas we work together to promote initiatives for inter-religious dialogue and peace. My skills are recognized and my commitment to constructive projects cannot be called into question by malicious insinuations.
3. Proven independence
Bruxelles Média operates without public subsidies and has never sought any. We concentrate on organizing constructive events and debates. Blast’s insinuations are not only unfounded, they are part of a strategy of intimidation typical of media losing credibility.
The allegations of a link with Le Matin.ma are based on a technical misunderstanding. Our webmaster has clarified that this was a simple error, and not a connivance with a Moroccan media outlet. Blast’s continued insistence on this point demonstrates its inability to conduct a rigorous and honest investigation.
5. Interfaith dialogue: an easy target
My collaboration with religious institutions and actors, be it the Church of Scientology, but also with Sikhs, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Catholics, Protestants and even humanists, is part of a framework of inter-religious dialogue, and not part of any promotion of sectarianism. This willingness to reduce my efforts to accusations of complicity is a reflection of Blast’s ignorance and contempt for the work of those who genuinely seek to promote dialogue and peace.
6. Blast: a corrupt media on the verge of decline
It’s ironic that Blast, which claims to uphold ethical values, is itself at the heart of controversies concerning its independence and dubious practices. Suspected links with investors from the United Arab Emirates raise questions about their objectivity. Indeed, the newspaper “Libération” recently accused Blast of being financed by investors from the United Arab Emirates, raising questions about the transparency of their operations. It is also worth noting that Blast is facing more than 40 complaints for misleading and defamatory investigations, testifying to its inability to produce quality journalism.
Blast is also the newspaper which, on October 7 2024, as the world commemorates the innocent Jewish victims killed by Hamas in Israel, publishes an interview with Michèle Siboni in which she declares that “the Jews who died on October 7, and all those who followed, are the victims of a colonial regime”, and that the Hamas assassins are waging nothing other than a “war of liberation of an oppressed people”. To justify itself, Blast can think of nothing better than to invoke a concern for “rationality and freedom”. Certainly, my work for peace, particularly between Israelis and Palestinians, Jews and Muslims, will not find favor in the eyes of a media suffering from such unabashed anti-Semitism.
Bruxelles Média: Firm response to the defamatory allegations made by Blast 8
Certainly, by publishing their article today, on the eve of the municipal elections, they are hoping to influence the vote, perhaps financed by backers who would prefer not to see actors for peace and dialogue elected. Another ironic position of Blast which states that politics and journalism sometimes don’t mix.
In conclusion, I strongly condemn Blast’s attacks, which have no other aim than to sully my reputation and that of Bruxelles Média. We will continue to work for peace and dialogue, despite the attempts to denigrate by a media that is losing ground.
Dr Krausz has supervised MSCA postdoctoral researchers and coordinated several MSCA projects over the past two decades, including NICOS, ALPINE or ATTOTRON.
Both L’Huillier and Krausz obtained funding and cooperated through the MSCA doctoral training network ATTOFEL, and trained and supervised a number of doctoral researchers.
They also received funding through several projects funded under FP6, the 6th EU’s research and innovation programme.
Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded to former MSCA supervisors Alain Aspect and Anton Zeilinger, alongside John F. Clauser, “for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science”.
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, awarded to former MSCA supervisor Morten Meldal, alongside Carolyn R. Bertozzi and K. Barry Sharpless, “for the development of click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry”.
2021
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, awarded to former MSCA supervisors Benjamin List and David MacMillan for their development of organocatalysis, a new precise tool for molecular construction described as “an ingenious tool for building molecules”.
2020
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, awarded to Emmanuelle Charpentier (Max Planck Unit for the Science of Pathogens), an MSCA alumna and principal investigator involved in the training of young researchers in the field of genomics in the MSCA project ENLIGHT-TEN ITN.
Dr Charpentier received the award alongside Dr Jennifer A. Doudna “for the development of a method for genome editing”, CRISPR/Cas9.
2017
Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded for the work of Rainer Weiss, Barry C. Barish and Kip S. Thorne “for their decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the observation of gravitational waves”.
The MSCA project GraWIToN involved nine MSCA fellows who contributed to the preparation of the data on gravitational waves.
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, to Richard Henderson (Medical Research Council), the coordinator of the MSCA project Membrane Proteases. His work was honoured along with Jacques Dubochet and Joachim Frank “for developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution”.
They received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry along with J. Fraser Stoddart “for the design and synthesis of molecular machines”.
2015
Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded to Takaaki Kajita (University of Tokyo) who was involved in MSCA projects as a participant. He earned the Nobel Prize “for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass”.
The Japanese researcher has participated in several MSCA projects promoting international collaboration, such as ELITES, SKPLUS and InvisiblesPlus.
2014
Stefan W. Hell (Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry in Göttingen, German Cancer Research Centre in Heidelberg) was an MSCA fellow at the University of Turku in 1996-1997. He then coordinated several MSCA Individual Fellowships prior to receiving the Nobel Prize in Chemistry along with Eric Betzig and William E. Moerner “for the development of super-resolved fluorescence microscopy”.
The MSCA fellowship saved my career because it bought me some time to perform a number of important experiments that supported the viability of my ideas and eventually find an institution that would support me in pursuing them.
Dr. Stefan Hell, 2014 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
Edvard I. Moser and May-Britt Moser (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim) are former MSCA project coordinators. The two Norwegians received a Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology alongside John O’Keefe “for their discoveries of cells that constitute a positioning system in the brain”.
Jean Tirole (Toulouse School of Economics) was a supervisor of the MSCA project MASIEGE. He received the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel “for his analysis of market power and regulation”.
2013
James Rothman (Yale School of Medicine) was a supervisor in the MSCA project BFLDs. He received the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine alongside Randy W. Schekman and Thomas C. Südhof “for their discoveries of machinery regulating vesicle traffic, a major transport system in our cells”.
Serge Haroche (Collège de France and École Normale Supérieure) supervised the MSCA project ONDEQUAM. He received the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics alongside David J. Wineland “for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems”.
2010
Konstantin Novoselov (University of Manchester) has received funding, supervised and coordinated several MSCA projects, including GRAPHENE, MEDICIS-PROMED, 2DMAT4ENERGYand PTMCnano. He received the Nobel Prize in Physics alongside Andre Geim “for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene”.
In a passionate and reflective speech delivered at the European Parliament during the “how to stop the rise of religious intolerance in Europe” debate, Mr. Margaritis Schinas, Vice President of the European Commission, addressed the importance of religious freedom, tolerance, and the European way of life. His speech, rich in both historical context and forward-looking vision, called for a united European response to religious intolerance while affirming the values that define Europe today.
Schinas highlighted both the internal and external challenges facing the European Union and emphasized Europe’s commitment to human rights, freedom of religion, and the protection of democracy. However he failed to mention the lack o action and the amount of state sponsored discriminations within Europe, not just about historical religions, but specially against the new religious movements, often ostracized by the very European Commission.
Mr. Schinas began his address by acknowledging the importance of religious tolerance as central to what Europe stands for today. “It’s a union of freedom. It’s a union of democracy,” he declared, emphasizing the need to preserve these core values within and beyond European borders. Schinas made it clear that addressing religious intolerance in all its forms is an essential part of maintaining Europe’s identity as a beacon of democracy and freedom.
Joint Action Against Religious Intolerance
Religious intolerance remains a significant issue both within Europe and abroad. Schinas stressed the need for a united approach at the EU level, urging for collaboration among European institutions. He called for dialogue and understanding, cautioning against finger-pointing or fostering toxic divisions. “All of us work together at EU level, within the EU institutions, without pointing fingers, without cries of hatred, without toxicity, through dialogue and understanding,” he said, signaling the importance of constructive engagement in tackling this sensitive issue.
The European Commission, according to Schinas, is committed to playing a pivotal role in addressing religious intolerance by providing funding, support, and catalyzing processes that foster togetherness among Europeans.
Promoting Religious Freedom Beyond Europe’s Borders just by word
In addition to tackling issues within Europe, Schinas emphasized Europe’s moral responsibility to defend freedom of religion and belief worldwide. “We have a moral duty to stand for religious freedom,” he asserted. Europe must speak out wherever religions, including Christianity, are under threat, and where individuals are persecuted for their beliefs. To this end, Schinas announced (as if it was almost new) the appointment of Frans van Daele as the EU’s envoy for promoting and protecting religious freedom across the globe (in fact only for outside the European Union), reaffirming Europe’s commitment to championing these freedoms beyond its borders.
He shared details of van Daele’s recent missions to Jerusalem and Pakistan, noting that these efforts are critical in spreading the European message of religious tolerance and freedom across the world. However, Schinas did not mention that the status of the EU Special Envoy is not better than the one of a volunteer, with no salary, no budget and not political weight.
The European Way of Life: A Broken Mirror of Values
Schinas then turned to a theme that has defined much of his tenure as Vice President: the European way of life. Recalling his parliamentary hearing five years ago, where the European way of life was debated, Schinas underscored that this concept is not about exclusion or superiority. “The European way of life is not a bulldozer. It’s a mirror that reflects the richness, the diversity, the might, the values, the principles that unite us,” he explained.
The European way of life, as Schinas described, is a system where democracy flourishes, minorities’ rights are meant to be protected, and human rights are respected (at least by some). It is a union where women play a central role in family, society, and the workplace, where education and health systems are universal and free, and where the elderly are cared for. “We are the world champions of human rights, of data protection, and we don’t have the death penalty,” he affirmed as if no violations of these occur in the EU, noting that while pieces of this might be found elsewhere, the full picture of these values is unique to Europe.
Margaritis Schinas’ speech at the European Parliament attempted to give a powerful reminder of the values that are meant to underpin Europe’s identity: freedom, democracy, tolerance, and unity. By addressing the challenges of religious intolerance and defending religious freedoms, both within Europe and abroad, Schinas reaffirmed the EU’s commitment to upholding its core principles, even if these kind and powerful words need still to be brought to visible and efficient action. His message was clear: the European way of life is not about division or exclusion, but about inclusivity, diversity, and respect for all. This should mean not just for Christians, Jewish, Muslims and Atheists, but also for Baha’is, Hindus, Scientologists, Sikhs, Buddhists, Freemasons, Jehovah Witnesses, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Later Day Saints and even Pagans. As he concluded, “You can find bits and pieces of this elsewhere in the world, but all this together you will only find here, and it’s called the European way of life.“
Now, let’s see what the upcoming executives of the European Commission will have to say, and more importantly, what they will do… Will the European Commission continue to not practice what they preach?
Nine out of ten consumers have been affected by “dark commercial patterns” – manipulative online design tactics such as countdown timers, hidden fees, and subscription traps that influence consumer behaviour and often lead to unintended purchases or privacy compromises. These deceptive practices are widespread on websites and apps, posing significant risks to consumers worldwide.
The findings are part of a new OECD survey conducted with over 35 000 respondents across 20 countries. They were presented during the OECD Consumer Policy Ministerial Meeting on 8-9 October, where Ministers adopted a Declaration committing to further protecting and empowering consumers in the digital and green transitions. The Declaration underscores the need to act against both current and emerging harms consumers face online, encourages businesses to adopt fair practices, and commits governments to protect all consumers. It places emphasis on those who may be particularly vulnerable, such as children, older consumers and infrequent internet users. Additionally, the Declaration calls for an update to the OECD Recommendation on Consumer Protection in E-commerce to better address the evolving risks and harms in the digital transition.
“With consumer spending accounting for about 60% of GDP in OECD countries on average, consumer policies have an important role to play in contributing to well-functioning, open and competitive markets by protecting consumers from deceptive, unfair and fraudulent commercial practices and unsafe products, fostering informed consumer decisions and trust, and ensuring a level playing field for businesses, by ensuring fair competition based on quality, price and innovation,” OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann said. “Today’s Ministerial Meeting has discussed how policymakers can ensure consumer policies help people navigate these new digital and green products, services and options, by adapting to new technology-related risks, by continuing to prioritise consumer safety, and by ensuring consumer policies are well co-ordinated with other relevant areas, such as competition, digital and environmental policies.”
The OECD also announced the launch of the Global Forum on Consumer Policy. This new forum will bring together policy makers, academics, civil society, businesses, and experts in an inclusive network to collaborate on consumer issues, behavioural economics, technological trends, and emerging consumer policy research.
Participants also addressed ways to protect and empower consumers making sustainable consumption decisions and tackle new consumer product safety risks. A part of the discussion was the safe and responsible use of lithium-ion batteries. With a growing number of safety incidents involving these batteries, the OECD and its members are launching an awareness campaign on their safe and responsible use. The global lithium-ion battery market is projected to reach USD 307.8 billion by 2032, up from USD 59.8 billion in 2022, underscoring the urgency of these efforts.
For more information on the outcomes of the OECD Consumer Policy Ministerial Meeting, please visit: https://oe.cd/consumer24.
Working with over 100 countries, the OECD is a global policy forum that promotes policies to preserve individual liberty and improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world.
Frankfurt/Main, More than 160 representatives from a thriving international Non-GMO industry and leading European associations from 23 countries and four continents met on 7th and 8th October 2024 at the ‘International Non-GMO Summit 2024’ in Frankfurt. Operators across the full Non-GMO value chain are united in battling the current challenges posed by the planned deregulation of New Genomic Techniques, as proposed by the EU Commission. The participants at the Summit gave a clear message for freedom of choice and transparency.
“The Non-GMO sector is here to stay!”
On behalf of the organisers, Alexander Hissting, Managing Director of VLOG emphasised: “Non-GMO markets are economically very successful and are thriving with strong support from consumers. We are ready and willing to face current political and market challenges.“ The organisers are convinced that NGTs should be strictly regulated, just like all other GMOs. Hissting’s clear message: “The Non-GMO sector is here to stay!”
High-level political support, advocating freedom of choice
The current Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union and the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) want to work towards a compromise in the revision of the EU‘s GMO legislation that ensures consistent labelling, coexistence and traceability in dealing with new genetic engineering techniques (NGTs). In his welcoming address, Dr. István Nagy, current President of the EU Council for Agriculture and Fisheries, stated: “I am convinced that the precautionary principle should be applied when new technologies are used and organisms produced with such techniques are released into the environment and the food chain. Furthermore, I consider it to be of the utmost importance to provide consumers with adequate information and to guarantee their freedom of choice.”
German State Secretary Silvia Bender criticised the European Commission’s draft regulation on NGTs, doubting that it sufficiently takes into account the interests of consumers, farmers and food processors: “The market for Non-GMO products has been growing for years and we want to preserve this added value. To do this, we need functioning coexistence measures, from seeds to consumer. Our goal is to find a compromise for a socially acceptable way of dealing with the new genetic engineering methods, and we are working on that,” Bender explained. Call to strengthen critical voices in the EU: Keeping Europe GMO-free
Dietmar Vybiral from the Austrian Ministry of Health gave a detailed update on the current standstill with the negotiations around the planned revision of the EU’s GMO legislation. He explained that as Ministers at the EU Council could not yet agree on a “general approach”, trilogue negotiations between the three main EU institutions cannot start. Mr Vybiral called on those at the Summit to: “strengthen the critical voices in their respective governments to vote against a deregulation of NGTs.” He continued: “Austria has always stated that NGTs must be regulated as GMOs. Therefore, all NGTs products must have a proper risk assessment, must be labelled and have traceability assured – only this can ensure consumers’ knowledge and freedom of choice.”
The coordinator of the European DARWIN project, Odd-Gunnar Wikmark from the Norwegian research instituteNORCE, reported on future-oriented research into reliable detection methods for NGTs. “It will be possible to develop detection methods for known varieties of NGTs. And we are confident that in time also untargeted detection methods will be developed.”
Hans-Peter Dejakum, representative of the premium wafers and chocolate producer Loacker from South Tyrol, believes in the high value of excluding GMOs from the company’s supply chains: “We are tracking consumer wishes in around 70 countries and we know that our customers truly want our Non-GMO products. In the last decade we have substantially invested to build up a credible Non-GMO value chain and we definitely want to continue this way.” Loacker exports its product with Non-GMO label to more than 100 countries worldwide.
Good availability of soy, rapeseed and corn – but even more potential
International experts in the field of raw material production and agricultural trade agreed that the most important regions for non-GMO commodities (especially soy, corn, rapeseed) currently have good market coverage – in Latin America (especially Brazil) as well as in Europe (especially Ukraine). There are also sufficient growth opportunities to further increase the availability of GMO-free feed and thus keep pace with rising demand. The supply of GMO-free goods is secured for this year and the next, explained Bertalan Kruppa, Donau Soja, Maxime Montserrat, Bunge and Daniele Marcomin,Agribusiness di Covolato in their presentations on the current situation on the international markets.
“Keep calm and carry on!”
Heike Moldenhauer, Secretary General of ENGA, concluded the Summit on behalf of the organisers, with a clear call to the Non-GMO industry present “to keep calm and carry on”. The battle for the right to continue to produce without GMOs is far from over, Moldenhauer stated: Currently there are hardly any New GMOs on the global markets – none in the EU, just a handful in countries where New GMOs have a non-regulated status. Therefore, markets will not be flooded with New GMOs in the coming years – as a glance at the companies’ development pipelines shows.
In addition, the exploration of audit strategies and research on detection methods and improvements in traceability have picked up speed. Moldenhauer is confident that significant progress will be reached to exclude New GMOs from Non-GMO value chains
London, U.K. 8 October 2024: UK-based, nonprofit The Chancery Lane Project (TCLP) has launched six new foreign-language climate clauses — three German and three Japanese. These clauses help organisations integrate net zero commitments into their contracts, making it easier to meet climate targets with accountability and impact.
The Chancery Lane Project (TCLP) is a pioneering nonprofit that equips organisations with free, cutting-edge legal tools (guides, clauses, and glossary terms) designed to reduce emissions and drive real climate action. Large companies like Telstra, Salesforce, Vodafone, NatWest, and Cambridge University Press are leveraging TCLP’s climate clauses to embed sustainability into their operations.
The release of these six country clauses marks the first time the organisation has published climate clauses in a foreign language. The Japanese clauses are the nonprofit’s first set published specifically for an Asian jurisdiction.
These Japanese and German clauses solve a range of different climate issues for organisations:
Riku’s Clause provides climate change clauses for Heads of Terms, making climate a key consideration for any deal team.
Sakura and Sora’s DDQ is a due diligence questionnaire for corporate mergers and acquisitions.
Sumire’s Clause (transposed from Agatha’s Clause) gives customers a right to switch suppliers if their existing supplier cannot match a ‘greener’ offer made by an alternative supplier.
Fenjas-Klausel is an ESG-oriented remuneration and compensation clause for executives.
Pauls-Policy guides companies towards greater social responsibility through ESG-aligned corporate governance.
Uwes-Klausel is an employment contract clause tied to ESG.
Natasha Morgan, Head of Legal Content at The Chancery Lane Project commented:
“With the rise of climate regulations worldwide, such as the CSDDD and the German Due Diligence Supply Chain Act, legal frameworks are becoming critical tools for real climate action. Our new Japanese and German climate clauses empower organisations to take meaningful steps toward net zero, embedding sustainability into the heart of their contracts. This is more than just legal compliance—it’s about driving change from within.”
The Chancery Lane Project is committed to supporting companies globally to decarbonise contracts. Today’s announcement follows the recent publication of new English language international clauses in the US, Germany, Australia and Italy.
The Faith and Freedom Summit IV, held on September 24-25 at the Latin American Parliament in Panama City, brought together a diverse coalition of voices advocating for religious freedom and peaceful coexistence. With more than 40 international speakers representing a wide array of beliefs—including Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Scientologists, Indigenous Mayans, Sikhs, Hindus, and non-believers—the summit served as a vital platform for dialogue and collaboration. Among the keynote speakers was UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Dr. Nazila Ghanea.
In a significant address delivered digitally at the Faith and Freedom Summit held at the Latin American Parliament in Panama, Dr. Nazila Ghanea, highlighted the critical role of ensuring that no one suffers discrimination or violations of human rights due to their religion or belief. Despite her inability to attend in person, Dr. Ghanea’s speech touched on various pertinent themes that are central to the global efforts to safeguard this fundamental freedom.
Dr. Ghanea began her remarks by emphasizing the collective responsibility that each one of us shares in upholding freedom of religion or belief. She stated, “We have gathered…in recognition of the responsibilities we shoulder in ensuring that nobody is discriminated [against] on grounds of their religion or belief, and that each and every one of us is able to enjoy freedom of religion or belief.” The summit brought together participants from across the globe, both in-person and digitally, to reaffirm the importance of advancing these rights for all.
Diplomacy and Freedom of Religion or Belief:
One of the key themes Dr. Ghanea highlighted was the intersection of diplomacy and the protection of religious freedoms. She referred to the report AHRC 5238, presented to the UN Human Rights Council in March 2023, which focused on the global landscape of freedom of religion or belief. The report draws attention to the increasing number of actors involved in this diplomacy and calls on them to uphold the universality and indivisibility of human rights. Despite the growing engagement, Dr. Ghanea warned that “the challenge before us remains great,” urging for sustained efforts in this area.
Regional and International Cooperation:
Dr. Ghanea underlined the significance of collaboration between regional and international systems for protecting religious freedoms. She noted the productive engagement between her mandate and regional bodies like the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court. “It’s critical that we are informed, we are open, and we leave the option for collaboration,” she stressed. Such cooperation is essential to sharing best practices, lending support, and even taking joint actions where possible.
Grassroots and Civil Society Involvement:
Another crucial theme in Dr. Ghanea’s speech was the role of national systems, civil society, and grassroots movements in promoting freedom of religion or belief. She referenced her October 2023 report (A78207) to the UN General Assembly, which examined this right from a grassroots perspective. “If we don’t consider it from the viewpoint of the beneficiary, that is everyone, then what is the point of freedom of religion or belief?” she asked rhetorically. Dr. Ghanea emphasized that state actors have a legal obligation, while non-state actors carry the responsibility to ensure this right is fully realized.
At the national level, she stressed that the state’s obligation extends to various authorities, from federal to municipal levels, and that these actors must be aware, trained, and held accountable. Non-state actors, particularly civil society, play a vital role in strengthening national policies and holding governments accountable to their international human rights obligations.
Media’s Role in Promoting Religious Freedom:
Dr. Ghanea also touched upon the media’s impact on promoting or hindering freedom of religion or belief. She referred to the report AHRC 5547, presented in March 2024, which discussed the role of media and civil society in countering advocacy of hatred based on religion or belief. She emphasized that media responses, alongside state and civil society actions, can be transformative in promoting religious tolerance and understanding.
Religions and Beliefs as Instruments of Peace:
Towards the conclusion of her speech, Dr. Ghanea referred to her upcoming report (A79182) on peace and freedom of religion or belief, to be presented in October 2024. The report explores how religious freedom can foster peacebuilding and conflict prevention. “Freedom of religion or belief creates the conditions, motivations, rationales, and movements for peace to emerge,” she stated, highlighting the potential of this fundamental right to not only ensure personal freedoms but also to serve as a cornerstone for global peace and stability.
Conclusion: A Call for Continued Collaboration and Vigilance:
Dr. Ghanea’s speech ended on a note of optimism and a call for continued vigilance and collaboration in securing freedom of religion or belief. Congratulating the summit organizers for curating such a relevant and impactful program, she reaffirmed the critical importance of drawing attention to both state and non-state actors’ responsibilities in securing this right. She also expressed hope that the summit would sharpen collaboration between political leaders, religious figures, human rights advocates, academics, and others in achieving greater effectiveness in safeguarding freedom of religion or belief for all.
Dr. Ghanea extended her best wishes for the success of the summit and expressed her eagerness to hear about its findings. Her message underscored the shared commitment to upholding one of humanity’s most fundamental freedoms, ensuring that every person, regardless of their faith or belief, can live without fear of discrimination or oppression.
“So to sum up, I congratulate the organisers for sketching out such a pertinent programme of work for the summit and join all of you in prioritising and recognising the critical obligations of state authorities in securing this right for everyone and drawing attention to the significant responsibilities of the rest of us towards the same objective.” concluded Ghanea.
The Faith and Freedom Summit IV was organised by a coalition of NGOs dedicated to the promotion of religious freedom and peaceful coexistence, and was attended by numerous personalities such as the OAS Representative in Panama H.E. Mr Rubén Farje, Reverend Giselle Lima (Co-Coordinator of the Panama Roundtable on Religious Freedom in Panama, Mr. Iván Arjona-Pelado (recently appointed Chair of the NGO Committee on FoRB for the United Nations in Geneva and who presented the web www.whatisfreedomofreligion.org from the Church of Scientology), Ms. Maureen Ferguson who is one of the USCIRF Commissioners, Jan Figel (former EU Special Envoy on FoRB) and it was opened and closed by the Minister In Charge of Interior and Minister In Charge of Foreign Affairs of the Government of Panama, plus ambassadors from different countries.
On a day that marked significant reflection and determination, Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, addressed the European Parliament, focusing on key issues impacting Hungary, Ukraine, and the wider European Union. With a tone of solidarity and unity, she emphasized the importance of collective action in tackling the pressing challenges of our time: from climate change and migration to competitiveness and the ongoing war in Ukraine.
The Aftermath of Extreme Weather in Central Europe
The speech opened with von der Leyen expressing solidarity with Hungary and Central Europe after devastating floods, which delayed the meeting by three weeks. She described the extreme weather as a consequence of climate change, highlighting that “five months’ worth of rain fell on Central Europe in just four days.” The magnitude of the floods was unprecedented, causing destruction to landmarks, crops, and industries across the region, particularly in Budapest.
However, amidst this devastation, von der Leyen applauded the resilience of the Hungarian people: “In these three weeks, we have seen the people of Hungary rolling up their sleeves and helping one another.” She emphasized that Europe would stand by Hungary, stating, “The European Union is there for the people of Hungary in this emergency and beyond.” The European Commission had already mobilized its Copernicus satellites to aid in the rescue efforts, and Hungary was encouraged to access the EU’s Solidarity Fund to rebuild.
Supporting Ukraine Through Its Hardest Winter
Von der Leyen shifted the focus to Ukraine, a country heading into its third winter of war with Russia. The situation has worsened as Russia continues its assaults, launching over 1,300 drones on Ukrainian cities in the past month alone, targeting essential energy infrastructure and causing widespread destruction. In a powerful rebuke to those who downplay Russia’s aggression, von der Leyen asked, “Would they ever blame the Hungarians for the Soviet invasion in 1956? Would they ever blame the Czechs or Slovaks for the Soviet repression of 1968?” She emphasized that the Ukrainian people are freedom fighters, much like the heroes who liberated Central and Eastern Europe from Soviet rule.
Europe’s response to the war is unwavering. Von der Leyen announced that the EU, alongside the G7, had pledged €50 billion to Ukraine, of which €35 billion would come in the form of loans to support the country’s national budget. Critically, these loans would be repaid using the windfall profits from immobilized Russian assets. “We are making Russia pay for the damage it caused,” she asserted, emphasizing Europe’s continued support for Ukraine “through this winter and for as long as it takes.”
Enhancing European Competitiveness
The next priority in von der Leyen’s speech centered on improving European competitiveness. She referred to the Draghi report, which provided a roadmap for strengthening the EU’s economic future. The primary concern raised was the “innovation gap” between Europe and other major economies, particularly in the digital space. “Too many of our innovative companies have to look at the United States or Asia to finance their expansion,” she noted, pointing out that while European households have €300 billion in savings, much of it is invested outside the continent.
Von der Leyen proposed a solution: the creation of a savings and investment union, aimed at eliminating barriers that prevent companies from scaling up across European borders. To boost competitiveness, she suggested a reduction in regulatory burdens, especially in sectors like finance and digital technologies.
However, the president took a firm stance against Hungary’s current policies, criticizing the Hungarian government for its discriminatory practices towards European businesses. She questioned how Hungary could hope to attract investments when it imposes arbitrary export restrictions, discriminatory taxes, and allows corruption to flourish in public contracts. “This creates uncertainty and undermines investors’ trust,” she warned, pointing out that Hungary’s GDP per capita had fallen behind its Central European neighbors.
Decarbonization and Energy Security
Von der Leyen also tackled the issue of decarbonization, a critical part of Europe’s path towards sustainability. In light of the ongoing war, she reminded the parliament of the pledge made by all 27 EU leaders at Versailles to diversify away from Russian fossil fuels. “One thousand days later, Europe has indeed diversified,” she declared, with half of Europe’s electricity generation now coming from renewable energy sources. However, she condemned Member States that still relied on Russian fossil fuels, stating unequivocally that “Russia has proven time and again it is simply not a reliable supplier.”
Her message was clear: energy security is synonymous with European security. Europe must continue its transition to clean, homegrown energy, creating jobs within the EU rather than sending money to Russia.
Migration: A Challenge for Europe
Migration remained a key topic in von der Leyen’s speech. Acknowledging it as a “European challenge that requires a European answer,” she emphasized the importance of implementing the newly adopted Pact on Migration and Asylum. The EU is already working with Member States at its external borders, but von der Leyen expressed concern over Hungary’s approach to the migration issue. She pointed out that Hungarian authorities had released convicted smugglers and traffickers from prison before they had completed their sentences, undermining European efforts to combat illegal migration. “This is not fighting illegal migration in Europe. This is not protecting our Union,” she criticized.
Additionally, von der Leyen highlighted the security risks posed by Hungary’s visa scheme, which allowed Russian nationals to enter the EU without proper security checks. She also questioned the Hungarian government’s decision to allow Chinese police to operate within its borders, describing these actions as threats to European sovereignty.
A Call for European Unity
Von der Leyen concluded her speech with a powerful call for European unity, recalling Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s words from 2011 when Hungary first held the Presidency of the Council of the EU: “We will follow in the footsteps of the revolutionaries of 1956. We intend to serve the cause of European unity.” Reaffirming that “Europe must stand united,” she addressed the Hungarian people directly, saying, “Your story is our story. Your future is our future. 10 million Hungarians are 10 million good reasons to keep shaping our future together.”
In this critical moment for Europe, von der Leyen’s speech served as both a warning and a reminder of the values that bind the European Union together—solidarity, unity, and a shared commitment to freedom and democracy.
