Independent UN Human Rights Council-appointed experts said in a statement that it represents a fundamental attack on women’s rights.
The legislation, which applies to children as young as 12, combines severe criminal penalties with mandatory citizen surveillance and systematic enforcement across all sectors of society, the experts added.
The Law on Protecting the Family through the Promotion of the Culture of Chasity and Hijab, represents what experts describe as “an intensification of State control over women’s bodies in Iran and a further assault on women’s rights and freedoms”.
Existing restrictions
The new legislation expands existing restrictions, targeting women and girls who fail to wear a hijab in both physical and online spaces. While the hijab requirements were already mandatory under Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, this new law introduces dramatically harsher consequences.
Violations can now result in extended prison sentences of up to 15 years and substantially increased fines. Most concerning to human rights experts is the provision allowing judges to impose the death penalty under the charge of “corruption on earth”.
Systematic impact on Iranian society
The law’s reach extends far beyond individual enforcement, embedding mandatory veiling and “culture of chastity” principles deep within Iranian society, the independent experts said.
Educational curricula, training programs and public information campaigns must now incorporate these concepts, effectively creating a State-sanctioned value system that experts warn will severely limit freedom of expression and belief.
“The law constitutes clear violation of fundamental human rights, legal norms and principles, including women’s rights to equality, freedom of expression, religion and belief, bodily autonomy, liberty, security and privacy, “the experts emphasised.
‘Climate of fear’
Additionally, the law’s approach to enforcement transforms ordinary citizens into agents of the State. The legislation requires individuals, families, and businesses to report instances of unveiling while also mandating extensive use of technology for enforcement purposes.
“These requirements will create a climate of fear and distrust among individuals and communities,” the experts warned, noting that severe economic punishments would likely hit vulnerable populations and groups including children, young persons, and social media users.
Long term consequences
The experts said that the enforcement will likely escalate violence against women and girls while further embedding systematic gender-based discrimination.
Harsh penalties along with citizen surveillance and institutional enforcement creates what they describe as a comprehensive system of gender-based persecution.
“We call upon the Government of Iran to immediately repeal the Hijab and Chasity Law and all other discriminatory legislation that perpetuates gender-based persecution,” the experts said, whilst confirming that they are in contact with the Government on this matter.
Special Rapporteurs and other independent rights experts are not UN staff, receive no salary for their work and have no connection to any government. They serve in their individual capacity.
A recently released publication is inviting fresh reflections on marriage and relationships, inspired by Pope Francis’s visit to Belgium earlier in 2024. The Pope’s visit was a moment of significance not only for Catholics but also for anyone who engages with the evolving meaning of partnership in contemporary society. Drawing on Pope Francis’s speeches and the theological insights he shared during his time in Belgium, the publication reflects on the enduring value of marriage and its challenges in the modern world.
The theology of marriage lies at the heart of this discussion, which is deeply rooted in the transformative teachings of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). During Vatican II, marriage was redefined as much more than a legal contract or a social expectation. Instead, it was described as a sacred covenant marked by love, partnership, and mutual respect. Pope Francis revisited this vision during his visit, urging people to reimagine marriage as a journey of equality and shared growth, rather than a rigid institution bound by tradition.
Belgium, like much of Europe, represents a society where traditional understandings of marriage are increasingly being rethought or reshaped. With divorce rates on the rise, growing recognition of same-sex unions, and an ongoing shift in gender roles, relationships today unfold in a far more diverse and complex landscape compared to the world of Vatican II. The newly published reflections on the Pope’s visit emphasize how his message remains relevant to these contemporary dynamics. While the language of the Church may be theological, its core principles—compassion, respect, and dignity in relationships—carry universal resonance.
For non-religious Europeans, the publication provides an opportunity to engage with these principles in a broader sense. It reflects how ideas of partnership go beyond faith, appealing to shared human values. In Pope Francis’s vision, marriage is described not as an obligation but as a commitment where both individuals are equal participants, offering and receiving unconditional support. This concept is particularly striking in a society where the pressures of work, individualism, and changing norms have made long-term partnerships increasingly challenging to sustain.
The publication also highlights how these reflections offer tools not just for couples, but for communities. By fostering relationships rooted in shared responsibility and care, the Pope’s visit to Belgium underscores the importance of viewing marriage—and partnerships in general—as a contribution to the social fabric of society. From the Church’s perspective, strong partnerships don’t just benefit individuals; they build stronger communities and encourage solidarity.
Released by KU Leuven’s Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, the publication reminds readers that while Pope Francis’s message is deeply tied to Catholic tradition, its implications are universal. Love, partnership, and mutual respect are values that transcend religious boundaries. The publication challenges readers to consider how these age-old principles can help us navigate modern dilemmas surrounding relationships, whether we come to marriage with faith or without it.
The Pope’s 2024 visit to Belgium was a bridge between traditional and contemporary understandings of relationships. Now, months later, this follow-up publication continues to carry forward its message—guiding both believers and secular audiences through one of society’s most profound questions: how to build meaningful and enduring connections in an ever-changing world. Whether one views marriage through the lens of theology or as a human institution, these reflections offer rich insights into the ties that bind us together.
In a time when the definition of marriage and partnership is wide open to interpretation, revisiting the Pope’s teachings during his 2024 visit might just offer a grounding perspective for anyone, regardless of belief.
In a significant move for global religious freedom, the UK Government has appointed David Smith MP as its new Special Envoy for Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB). This appointment, announced in early December 2024, signals the government’s commitment to advancing religious liberty across the globe and responds to increasing concerns over the persecution of religious minorities in many parts of the world. Smith, a Conservative MP with a strong track record on human rights issues, takes on a critical role at a time when religious freedoms face unprecedented challenges worldwide.
A Crucial Appointment for Religious Freedom
The new position of Special Envoy for FoRB was created in 2019 as part of the UK’s ongoing commitment to defending freedom of religion or belief for people of all faiths and none. The envoy works with international partners, including governments and civil society, to promote religious freedom, counter religious persecution, and support those who are oppressed because of their faith.
The announcement of Smith’s appointment was welcomed by a wide range of religious and human rights organizations. According to a statement from the UK government, the role will involve championing religious freedom in diplomatic discussions, strengthening the international coalition for religious liberty, and advocating for policies that protect the rights of religious minorities worldwide. Smith’s responsibilities will also include monitoring global trends related to religious freedom and providing guidance on how the UK can support vulnerable communities.
The Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO) emphasized that the appointment of a dedicated envoy underscores the UK’s resolve to ensure that religious freedom remains a central tenet of its foreign policy.
David Smith: A Defender of Religious Liberty
David Smith, a Member of Parliament for over a decade, is known for his advocacy of human rights and his commitment to religious freedom. His appointment to this high-profile position is seen as a logical step, given his background in championing issues related to freedom of conscience, expression, and belief.
Smith has long been involved in supporting religious communities facing persecution, particularly Christians and other minorities in conflict zones like the Middle East. In his parliamentary work, he has regularly spoken out on the importance of religious freedom as a fundamental human right and has pushed for stronger UK and international action against regimes that suppress religious expression. Smith’s extensive experience working on humanitarian issues makes him a powerful advocate for those suffering under oppressive regimes.
As the new Special Envoy, Smith will now be tasked with expanding these efforts on a global scale, leveraging his political influence and relationships to press for meaningful change.
Welcoming the Appointment: Reactions from Religious Organizations
The appointment has been widely lauded by faith-based organizations and advocacy groups across the UK. Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), a charity that focuses on helping persecuted Christians around the world, praised the selection of Smith, calling it a “significant step” towards addressing the growing global crisis of religious persecution. ACN’s UK director, Dr. Neville Kyrke-Smith, expressed hope that Smith’s work would lead to more coordinated international efforts to protect vulnerable religious communities, particularly in regions like the Middle East and Africa where Christians and other religious minorities often face violent oppression.
Similarly, Christian Concern, an organization dedicated to defending religious freedom, commended the UK government’s decision. Andrea Williams, the CEO of Christian Concern, described the appointment as an “important signal” that the UK is serious about protecting religious freedom. Williams emphasized the importance of Smith working with international counterparts to counter the rise of state-sponsored persecution, especially in countries like China and North Korea, where the freedom to practice religion is severely restricted.
Care, a Christian public policy charity, also welcomed Smith’s appointment, underscoring the importance of having a designated official who can actively engage with international partners to address the complex challenges posed by religious intolerance and persecution. “Religious freedom is an essential human right that must be defended wherever it is threatened,” said a Care spokesperson. “We look forward to working with Mr. Smith to ensure that religious liberty is placed at the heart of the UK’s foreign policy.”
The Role of the UK Government in Global Religious Liberty Advocacy
The creation of the Special Envoy for FoRB was part of a broader initiative by the UK government to elevate religious freedom on the global stage. The UK’s involvement in FoRB issues has historically been robust, with the government regularly highlighting the issue at the United Nations and within diplomatic circles. However, the rise of authoritarian regimes and the ongoing persecution of religious minorities have made the role of the Special Envoy increasingly important.
Smith’s predecessor, Fiona Bruce MP, held the position of Special Envoy for FoRB until recently, and during her tenure, she made significant strides in raising awareness of religious persecution worldwide. She met with Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Scientologists, Bahai’s, Latrer Day Saints and everyone who needed to meet with her. Under her leadership, the UK government took steps to support vulnerable religious groups, including the Yazidis in Iraq, Christians in the Middle East, and Uyghur Muslims in China. Smith’s appointment builds upon this legacy, and experts believe that his extensive experience will help to elevate the UK’s influence on this critical issue.
Smith’s work will not only focus on diplomatic efforts but will also involve collaborating with international civil society groups, religious leaders, and grassroots organizations that are directly involved in defending religious freedom. As the UK’s representative, Smith will be expected to engage with a wide range of stakeholders to foster international cooperation in addressing religious persecution.
Challenges Ahead
Despite the broad support for Smith’s appointment, there are significant challenges ahead. Religious persecution continues to rise in various regions of the world, with many countries adopting increasingly restrictive policies on religion and belief. In China, for example, the government continues to impose heavy restrictions on religious practices, particularly targeting Christian and Muslim communities. In countries like Nigeria and Pakistan, religious minorities such as Christians, Yazidis, and Hindus continue to face violence, discrimination, and displacement.
The Special Envoy’s role is not without its difficulties. Advocating for religious freedom in countries with hostile regimes can be politically sensitive, and the envoy must carefully balance diplomatic priorities with the need to confront human rights abuses. Moreover, given the complexity of global geopolitics, there will be times when the UK’s stance on religious freedom may clash with its economic or strategic interests in certain regions.
However, with Smith’s experience and commitment to the cause, the UK government’s approach to FoRB looks poised to continue making meaningful strides in the global fight for religious freedom.
Conclusion: A Beacon for Global Religious Liberty
David Smith’s appointment as the UK’s Special Envoy for Freedom of Religion or Belief represents a significant step forward in the fight to protect religious freedoms across the world. In a time of rising persecution and intolerance, Smith’s work will be essential in shining a spotlight on the plight of religious minorities and advocating for their rights on the global stage.
With the support of religious and human rights organizations, the UK’s commitment to religious freedom is stronger than ever, and Smith’s appointment signals that the country is ready to continue playing a leading role in defending this fundamental human right. As the world’s attention turns increasingly to issues of religious freedom, the role of the Special Envoy will remain crucial in shaping global responses and ensuring that the freedom to practice one’s faith is protected for all.
In a much-awaited speech marking one year since his inauguration, Argentina’s President Javier Milei presented a comprehensive and impassioned address, celebrating what he described as a transformative year for the nation. The speech, titled “The Most Important Announcement,” aimed to highlight the government’s achievements, justify the challenges faced by citizens, and outline a vision for Argentina’s future. While supporters praised his radical reforms, critics remained uncertain about the long-term viability of his policies.
A Year of Sacrifice and Hardship
“Dear Argentines, I want to begin by thanking you all,” Milei opened, expressing gratitude for the perseverance shown by ordinary citizens. Referring to the so-called “model of the caste” that he blamed for decades of mismanagement, he declared: “The sacrifice you’ve made is moving. I assure you, it will not be in vain.”
Milei acknowledged that his first year in office involved what he described as a “trial by fire,” citing measures that caused short-term pain but aimed at long-term gain. “When I took office, inflation was running at an annualized rate of 17,000%,” he stated, referring to hyperinflationary pressures that had gripped the economy. According to Milei, through aggressive fiscal measures, inflation is now under control, with the wholesale index showing just 1.2% for October.
Economic Overhaul
Central to Milei’s address was a detailed breakdown of his economic reforms. He highlighted the elimination of Argentina’s staggering fiscal deficit, turning it into a sustained surplus for the first time in over a century. “This was achieved through the largest adjustment in the history of humanity,” he said, emphasizing the controversial decision to halt monetary emissions. By cutting public spending and slashing government subsidies, Milei claims to have stabilized the economy and opened the doors to foreign investment.
On international debt, Milei painted a stark contrast between the state of affairs a year ago and today: “The debt with importers, which stood at $42.6 billion, is now cleared. Our trade surplus is growing, and reserves are being rebuilt.”
The Motosierra Plan in Action
A hallmark of Milei’s campaign was his pledge to wield a figurative “chainsaw” (motosierra) against public spending and government bloat. In his speech, he proclaimed significant progress in streamlining the state apparatus. “We’ve reduced ministries from 18 to 8 and eliminated nearly 100 redundant agencies. Public sector employees must now pass competency exams to keep their jobs.”
Milei’s critics argue that his drastic cuts to government services risk creating gaps in vital sectors. Nonetheless, he reiterated his belief that “a smaller state means greater liberty” and promised even more aggressive reforms in the coming year.
Social Policies and Public Order
The President also tackled the hot-button issue of public security. He touted a 63% reduction in homicides in Rosario, the epicenter of Argentina’s drug violence, attributing the success to his “Plan Bandera” and a tough-on-crime approach. “The streets are no longer dominated by fear and lawlessness,” he declared, adding that offenders are now compelled to work to repay their debt to society.
On social welfare, Milei emphasized that direct transfers to citizens, bypassing intermediaries, had restored dignity to the vulnerable. “A year ago, the Universal Child Allowance covered just 60% of the basic food basket. Today, it fully covers 100%,” he claimed.
Towards a Free-Market Future
Milei’s vision for Argentina’s economic future hinges on radical free-market principles. He announced the introduction of a monetary competition system, allowing Argentines to transact in any currency, including U.S. dollars. “We are laying the groundwork to eliminate the Central Bank entirely,” he said, framing this as a solution to Argentina’s chronic inflation.
His administration has also prioritized deregulation. “Over 800 regulations have been scrapped,” Milei boasted, citing industries from pharmaceuticals to e-commerce as beneficiaries. He also called for Argentina to embrace free trade, pushing for a historic agreement with the United States.
An Optimistic Outlook
Milei ended his speech on an optimistic note, promising that 2024 would mark a year of “high growth and low inflation.” He attributed this to structural reforms and the government’s ability to attract significant foreign investment. Highlighting Argentina’s potential to become a global hub for artificial intelligence and clean energy, he asserted, “We have the resources, talent, and freedom to lead in the technologies of tomorrow.”
Despite the ambitious rhetoric, the challenges ahead are immense. Social unrest, unemployment, and the erosion of public trust in institutions remain hurdles. Milei’s speech did not delve into these complexities, focusing instead on the positive outcomes of his administration.
Polarized Reactions
For supporters, Milei’s reforms represent a long-overdue reckoning with a bloated state and a corrupt political class. His aggressive deregulation and fiscal discipline have earned him comparisons to historical reformers.
However, critics argue that the speed and scale of his reforms risk destabilizing the economy and exacerbating inequality. Labor unions and opposition parties accuse him of prioritizing foreign investors over domestic welfare. Some fear that deregulation may erode labor protections and environmental safeguards.
Looking Ahead
Milei’s first year has been nothing short of transformative, characterized by bold policies and polarizing rhetoric. While his supporters see the makings of an “Argentine miracle,” skeptics remain unconvinced. As Argentina braces for another electoral year, Milei’s agenda will undoubtedly be a defining factor in the nation’s political and economic future.
Spain’s center-right Popular Party (PP) is intensifying its campaign to pressure Nicolás Maduro’s regime for the release of two Spanish citizens detained in Venezuela. As reported by Spanish newspaper El Mundo, José María Basoa and Andrés Martínez Adasme face unsubstantiated charges of espionage and conspiracy against the Venezuelan president. The PP’s initiative aims to rally European and international support for their immediate and unconditional release, while calling for tougher sanctions on Maduro’s regime.
Diplomatic Push and Broader Sanctions
As Nicolás Maduro seeks to secure a new presidential term, widely considered fraudulent by the international community, the PP is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy to hold the regime accountable. Among the measures proposed are:
Diplomatic Campaign: The PP has submitted a motion to Spain’s Congress demanding that the Sánchez government spearhead a diplomatic offensive, both domestically and internationally, to advocate for the detained Spaniards.
Enhanced Sanctions: The party is urging the Spanish government to push for an expansion of European Union sanctions against top Venezuelan officials. Proposed measures include additional asset freezes, travel bans, and stricter economic restrictions.
International Condemnation:Spain is called upon to lead efforts for a global denunciation of Maduro’s repressive practices, particularly the use of unfounded espionage allegations to target foreign nationals and opposition figures.
Repression Under Maduro’s Rule
It would seem that the arrests of Basoa and Martínez Adasme are not isolated incidents. The PP suggests that these incidents may be indicative of a broader pattern of political persecution by Maduro’s regime, which has been known to employ fabricated charges in an effort to silence dissent. It would seem that Venezuelan human rights groups and international observers have identified a growing reliance on intimidation and arbitrary detentions by the regime as a means of maintaining power.
As the new term of President Maduro approaches, European nations are facing an increasing number of calls to take action. The PP’s campaign is in line with calls from the Venezuelan diaspora and global democracy advocates for more robust measures against a regime that has been accused of undermining democratic principles and violating human rights.
Europe’s Role in the Crisis
The Popular Party believes that Spain has a responsibility to play as a leading European voice on Latin American issues. Spain could play a role in supporting democracy and human rights in Venezuela by using its influence in the EU to push for unified actions against Maduro’s government, from sanctions to political pressure.
It is anticipated that the motion will be discussed in Spain’s Foreign Affairs Committee, while the Senate will consider a resolution encouraging the government to consider a contingency plan (“Plan B”) should Maduro remain in power.
Brussels — The European Parliament has taken the initiative to approve new committees with the intention of addressing key issues facing citizens. In a constructive move, leaders of political groups have announced the establishment of two new standing committees and two special committees, reflecting the European Parliament’s (EP) commitment to addressing pressing citizen concerns. This decision, made during a crucial meeting on Friday, is intended to enhance the EP’s ability to address contemporary challenges in security, health, democracy, and housing.
It is worth noting that the subcommittee on Security and Defence has been upgraded to a full standing committee. In light of the growing number of global security threats and the intensifying debates over defense strategies, this committee will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping Europe‘s strategic responses. Similarly, the transformation of the Public Health subcommittee into a standing committee is a timely move, given the need for robust and ongoing legislative oversight in the face of health crises, such as pandemics and public health emergencies.
Furthermore, the establishment of two special committees demonstrates the EP’s proactive approach to addressing urgent matters. The Special Committee on European Democracy Shield will endeavor to protect democratic values and institutions throughout the EU, a welcome response to mounting concerns over electoral integrity and citizen engagement. Meanwhile, the Special Committee on the Housing Crisis is seeking to address the growing challenges many Europeans face in securing affordable housing, which has become a pressing issue in numerous member states.
The full House is scheduled to vote on these proposals on Wednesday, December 18, at noon, at which time the details regarding the committees’ mandates, membership, and terms of office are expected to be finalized. Following this vote, we will proceed to announce the lists of appointed members in a subsequent plenary session.
In light of this growing public interest in the workings of the EU and its institutions, it seems appropriate to consider these developments. It would seem that there is a growing need for effective governance that resonates with the electorate. The Conference of Presidents, which made this decision, highlighted the value of aligning the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure with these changes, ensuring that the updated standing committees reflect citizens’ expectations and the EP’s strategic objectives.
As Europe faces a range of complex challenges, from security threats to health emergencies and housing shortages, the establishment of these new committees is an encouraging sign of a commitment to responsive and responsible leadership. The vote on December 18th will be watched with interest, with many hoping that these committees will bring about positive change and renewed hope for European citizens confronting these pressing issues.
Washington, D.C., Dec 13 – Final In-person IRF Roundtable of 2024 Honors IRF Ambassador, Rashad Hussain on Capitol Hill
On December 9, the IRF Roundtable convened in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill for its final in-person IRF Roundtable of the year. Representatives from civil society and the U.S. Government discussed ongoing initiatives and challenges in advancing international religious freedom.
The meeting commenced with co-chairs Greg Mitchell and Nadine Maenza recognizing Ambassador Rashad Hussain’s exemplary service as Ambassador-at-large for International Religious Freedom in the U.S. Department of State. The IRF Roundtable community expressed deep gratitude for Ambassador Hussain’s steadfast participation in discussions and extended best wishes for his future endeavors. In turn, Ambassador Hussain conveyed his appreciation for the collective efforts of the IRF Roundtable participants.
Nominated in July 2021 and confirmed on January 24, 2022, by President Joseph Biden, Ambassador Rashad Hussain “serves as principal advisor to the Secretary and advisor to the President on religious freedom conditions and policy. He leads the Department’s efforts to monitor religious freedom abuses, persecution, and discrimination worldwide. He also oversees policies and programs to address these concerns and works to build diverse and dynamic partnerships with the broadest range of civil society, with equitable and meaningful inclusion of faith actors globally.”
Alongside Ambassador Hussain, other U.S. Government special guest speakers included:
Erin Singshinsuk, Executive Director, United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF)
Amanda Vigneaud, Initiative Lead, Center for Faith-Based & Neighborhood Partnerships, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
Miranda Jolicoeur, Director, Justice, Human Rights, and Security Office, USAID
Jenny Yang, External Relations Officer, United Nations Refugee Agency, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
The IRF Roundtable concluded with civil society representatives addressing critical issues in Turkey, Pakistan, India, Egypt, South Korea, and Burma, alongside global efforts to assist prisoners of conscience. Participants also discussed several active multi-faith letters:
An urgent call for the cessation of legal proceedings against detained university students associated with the Hizmet movement in Turkey.
A letter of collective support for Senator Marco Rubio’s ongoing dedication to promoting international religious freedom.
An additional letter encouraging Senator Rubio’s continued advocacy for prisoners of conscience should he assume the role of Secretary of State.
Before and after the IRF Roundtable meeting, participants gathered together for light holiday refreshments sharing best wishes to their fellow advocates during this time of hope, gratitude, and for many — prayer for peace in the world. The IRF Secretariat extended heartfelt thanks to all participants – both in-person and online – for their unwavering commitment to advancing international religious freedom.
Ambassador Rashad Hussain,
In sincere appreciation for your dedication and impact during your years of service as our Ambassador-at-large for International Religious Freedom. We are grateful for your ongoing collaboration with the IRF Roundtable.
A Personal and Professional Dedication to Agriculture
In a powerful address at one of Europe’s largest agricultural and food policy forums, Commissioner Christophe Hansen shared his personal and professional commitment to shaping the future of European agriculture. Drawing on his roots as a farmer from northern Luxembourg, Hansen highlighted how his upbringing and experiences drive his resolve to create policies that empower farmers, support rural communities, and secure the EU’s food supply for generations to come.
Speaking to a diverse audience of farmers, industry leaders, NGOs, consumers, and policymakers, Hansen emphasized the need for a collaborative, inclusive approach to agricultural policy. “For me,” he said, “there is no better way to start my second week than here with you at the biggest event for agriculture and food in Europe.”
The Challenges Facing European Agriculture
Commissioner Hansen addressed the myriad challenges confronting the sector:
Aging Farming Demographics: Only 12% of EU farmers are under the age of 40, with an average age of 57. Women account for just 3% of the farming workforce, underscoring the need for targeted initiatives to attract and retain diverse talent in agriculture.
Economic Pressures: Structural challenges, including declining farm numbers, economic disparities, and an administrative burden that overwhelms many, contribute to farming being perceived as a high-risk, stressful occupation.
Geopolitical and Environmental Pressures: Global tensions, climate change, and biodiversity loss are placing unprecedented strain on the sector, while demanding innovation and resilience from farmers.
Despite these obstacles, Hansen expressed deep admiration for the resilience of European farmers, calling for a united effort to capitalize on opportunities while addressing these pressing issues.
Commissioner Hansen’s Vision: A Roadmap for the Future
Hansen presented a forward-looking vision for a competitive, sustainable, and resilient agricultural sector. He outlined several priorities:
Generational Renewal and Demographic Balance Hansen highlighted the urgent need to attract young farmers by ensuring access to critical resources, such as fertile soil, land, capital, and technology. He emphasized improving rural infrastructure—such as broadband internet—and ensuring rural communities have the same opportunities and services as urban areas.“Without creating the right conditions, we risk losing the next generation of farmers,” he warned, adding that fostering family farming and supporting young entrants must be central tenets of EU agricultural policy.
Simplification of Regulations Hansen announced plans to reduce administrative burdens for farmers, emphasizing the importance of practical, actionable measures. He referenced a 2025 simplification package aimed at easing compliance for small-scale farmers, including farms under 10 hectares, as part of broader reforms for 2027.
Fairness and Value in the Food Supply Chain Stressing the importance of fairness, Hansen called for reforms to strengthen farmers’ bargaining positions and ensure equitable compensation. He underscored the need to rectify imbalances in the food chain and promote producer organizations to better position farmers in negotiations with retailers.
Investment in Innovation and Sustainability Hansen identified bridging the sector’s investment gap as a critical step toward driving innovation. He pointed to the need for research and technology that enable sustainable farming practices while addressing climate change and biodiversity goals.
Strengthening Global Competitiveness and Trade
Commissioner Hansen recognized that European agriculture is deeply interconnected with global trade. He highlighted the sector’s 2023 export success, valued at €230 billion, which created a €70 billion trade surplus. However, he emphasized the importance of reciprocity in trade, advocating for regulations that ensure imported goods meet the EU’s high environmental and ethical standards.
Hansen cited the EU’s deforestation regulation and restrictions on pesticide-treated imports as key examples of ensuring fairness while maintaining the EU’s competitive edge.
Climate and Environmental Goals
Acknowledging that farmers are both victims of and vital players in combating climate change, Hansen stressed the importance of incentivizing sustainable practices. “We need to develop tools to adapt and deploy innovation on the ground,” he said, rejecting top-down mandates in favor of tailored solutions.
He praised the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for its contributions to stability and food security over the past 60 years but stressed the need for reforms that balance predictability and flexibility. The CAP, he argued, must continue evolving to meet modern challenges while preserving its foundational strengths.
Collaborative Action for a Sustainable Future
To guide these efforts, Hansen announced the establishment of the European Board on Agriculture and Food, inviting recognized organizations to join this platform for dialogue and collaboration. He expressed his determination to foster constructive exchanges among all stakeholders to shape policies that reflect shared values and aspirations.
Closing his speech, Hansen spoke with heartfelt optimism about the future of European agriculture: “I want to create a better environment for our children and the next generation. This can only be achieved if all actors work together. We want to deliver healthy food, a healthy environment, and a sustainable livelihood for the next generation of farmers.”
As Germany faces significant economic challenges, Chancellor Olaf Scholz has taken the rare step of submitting a vote of confidence to parliament. The decision, marking the first time a German Chancellor has done so in nearly two decades, underscores the gravity of the situation. On Monday, German MPs will vote, determining not only Scholz’s political future but also the direction of Europe’s largest economy.
Why a Vote of Confidence Now?
The vote comes amid mounting economic instability. Germany, once the powerhouse of the European Union, is grappling with a range of crises in key industries such as automotive, iron, and steel. Economic growth projections remain dismal, lagging behind other nations. Against this backdrop, Scholz’s leadership faces increasing scrutiny.
Political analyst Dr. Hajo Funke points out that the stakes are high, not only for Scholz and his Social Democratic Party (SPD) but also for the broader coalition government. According to Dr. Funke, the SPD and the Greens aim to collaborate with the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) on pressing economic and social reforms. However, political maneuvering complicates the situation.
“The Union is tactically a bit in the trap,” says Dr. Funke. “If it doesn’t [cooperate], then it shows that it is socially and economically disinterested… On the other hand, it wants to tell voters that it is doing everything better.”
This delicate balance will likely lead to compromises between the governing parties and the CDU. These compromises are essential to maintaining voter trust ahead of the upcoming elections.
Germany’s Economic Turmoil
Germany’s economic instability cannot be overstated. Dr. Funke highlights the dramatic crises engulfing several sectors, including:
Automotive Industry: Once a global leader, the industry faces declining competitiveness and challenges in transitioning to electric vehicles.
Iron and Steel Production: These industries are struggling under the weight of high energy costs and global competition.
Suppliers: Economic pressures on suppliers ripple throughout the economy, deepening the crisis.
With economic growth prospects dim, Germany’s political leadership is under pressure to address key issues. These include implementing policies to reduce cold progression (a form of tax bracket creep), tackling rental price inflation, continuing financial support for Ukraine, and adhering to environmental and infrastructure commitments such as the Taurus decision.
The Political Fallout: What Happens Next?
The vote of confidence, scheduled for Monday, will test Scholz’s ability to lead through adversity. If Scholz loses the vote, German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier would have three weeks to dissolve parliament. This move could set the stage for snap elections as early as February 23, 2024.
According to recent polls, the CDU currently leads, but political campaigns and voter sentiment can shift rapidly. As Dr. Funke notes, the months leading up to the election will likely see intense debates and negotiations over Germany’s economic and social policies.
The Road Ahead
Germany stands at a crossroads. The outcome of the vote of confidence will determine whether Scholz’s government continues to address the country’s challenges or whether the public will opt for new leadership in early 2024. For now, all eyes are on Berlin, where Monday’s parliamentary vote may mark a turning point in Germany’s political and economic trajectory.
The EU has issued an updated list of airlines considered unsafe and banned from flying in the EU. The latest update adds Air Tanzania to the list due to safety concerns identified by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, while suspensions previously imposed on Pakistan International Airlines were lifted.
100 airlines certified in 15 countries, due to inadequate safety oversight by their national aviation authorities
22 airlines certified in Russia, as well as 7 airlines from other countries, based on serious safety deficiencies
EU’s commitment to safe flying
Flying is one of the safest ways to travel, thanks to the EU air safety policies. These policies ensure the highest levels of safety for passengers and promote cost-efficient rules that facilitate the free movement of products, services and people. The EU aviation safety system is overseen by the European Commission, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency and National Aviation Authorities. Its rules apply in all EU countries and cover all key areas of aviation including airworthiness, aircrew, aerodromes, air operations and the provision of air navigation services.
The implementation of the single aviation market has significantly increased air traffic and the number of airlines operating in Europe. To keep pace, the EU has prioritised work on effective aviation safety standards. The EU Air Safety List bans or restricts unsafe third-country air carriers that fail to meet international safety standards from flying in European skies and informs passengers of any such carriers.
The EU’s approach to safety management in aviation is based on occurrence reporting where safety-related events in civil aviation are tracked,analysed and followed up. Common rules on accident investigations are also designed to prevent the reoccurrence of dangerous incidents.
Aviation safety is a global concern, making international cooperation essential. The EU works closely with the International Civil Aviation Organization, provides technical assistance to and cooperates with third countries, and negotiates bilateral aviation safety agreements with key international partners to help ensure safe skies around the world.
